Blatantly interrupt them by saying 'you go to bed'Sexual Harassment Panda said:I cringe when I hear "at the end of the day", it's incredibly overused...by people like Jeremy Kyle.
Him: 'At the end of the day w-'
Me: 'You go to bed'
Blatantly interrupt them by saying 'you go to bed'Sexual Harassment Panda said:I cringe when I hear "at the end of the day", it's incredibly overused...by people like Jeremy Kyle.
People have a right to be silly. I don't see why people get angry over it.Estocavio said:I actually agree with you - What im referring to isnt ones right to hold an opinion, its people who chauvinistically cling on to opinions which are undeniably wrong by claiming that they have a right to it.Flames66 said:tricky_tree said:'To each his own.' Nope, just accept that your method is wrong, and mine is correctNow this is just my opinion, but I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If I disagree with you, I'm not going to change my opinion to suit you unless you fully convince me that yours is correct. This is not possible with anything accept tangible facts, and even those are open to interpretation.Estocavio said:"Its Just My Opinion, To Each Their Own" - There are many reasons this is incorrect.
Everything I have said is my opinion on the matter and I don't claim it to be fact. If you disagree then to each his own.
I can tell you if someone kicked me in the nuts, Kicking them back would certainly make me alot happier.zehydra said:The point of that saying is to try to teach people not to seek revenge, because revenge is NEVER productive, and is usually unnecessary for one's happiness.Jiraiya72 said:Are there any sayings that just make you rage? Whenever I speak of revenge on my mortal foes, it infuriates me when someone says "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind!" Yeah, well, that may be so, but If I'm going to be half blind, I'm sure as hell going to take one of their eyes with me. So, what sayings have you raging when heard?
Basically it's the fact that an exception that is stated serves to establish the existence of a rule that applies to cases not covered by the exception. If you look at wikipedia, of course taking it with a grain of salt, it dates back to Cicero.manythings said:I don't get that from a language point of view, I see what you mean but those words don't work like that. It's not actually proving anything, it's just a rule that you shouldn't in one out of seven occasions so really the rule is the exception.
Yes but in most cases these phrases are used (to me atleast) when the other person knows they are in the wrong but will not admit so. Whenever I encouter it, it is always used a get out of jail free card.Flames66 said:tricky_tree said:'To each his own.' Nope, just accept that your method is wrong, and mine is correctNow this is just my opinion, but I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If I disagree with you, I'm not going to change my opinion to suit you unless you fully convince me that yours is correct. This is not possible with anything accept tangible facts, and even those are open to interpretation.Estocavio said:"Its Just My Opinion, To Each Their Own" - There are many reasons this is incorrect.
Everything I have said is my opinion on the matter and I don't claim it to be fact. If you disagree then to each his own.
Yeah but what are you gonna do with that eye, he still has another eye. Yeah Ik it sounds like I'm taking this quote literally. Think about this if you fight back someone is gonna lose both eyes. Now there is an exception to this quote, as for people like terrorist, there just gonna take both eyes no matter what so it makes sense to fight back and at least survive with one eye.Jiraiya72 said:Are there any sayings that just make you rage? Whenever I speak of revenge on my mortal foes, it infuriates me when someone says "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind!" Yeah, well, that may be so, but If I'm going to be half blind, I'm sure as hell going to take one of their eyes with me. So, what sayings have you raging when heard?
Plus, Mirriam-Webster, though accepting that it is a word, actually encourages people to "just use regardless".Crystal Cuckoo said:Yet Oxford and Encarta agree.Johnnyallstar said:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardlessbue519 said:Irregardless.
ITS NOT A REAL WORD.
Webster disagrees.
It's tautology at its finest; "irregardless" and "regardless" mean exactly the same thing. The former seems to be a combination of "irrespective" and "regardless" creating a whole new word that creates a double-negative.
Specifically, to "proof" something is to "test" something, as one would traditionally "proof" fresh iron and steel to see if it is up to engineering standards.Stickem said:I'm aware. I was trying to be a jerkass. I'm still counting this as a success.manythings said:It's a scientific phrase. A scientific proof is a document compiling all the information on a given experimental procedure. The hypothesis, the test, the materials needed, the method, the kind of results and how the interpret the data. The proof would be presented to other scientists who would then try and break the experiment any way they can. If they find something that shows the experiment isn't consistent enough of many tests then it is rejected, if they can't it becomes an accepted theorem.Stickem said:Pardon me, but what?manythings said:"The exception that proves the rule."
I hate this saying because people who say clearly don't understand that it means the exact opposite of what they think. It should be;
"The exception that proofs the rule."
Later on with new information, technology and techniques old information is revisited and a new crop of scientists try to break the experiment again. If these new circumstances showed that the experiment is unsound it would be declared "The exception that proofs the rule" and it would be rejected and the whole idea rethought. In essence the rule is wrong so we need to remake it, not the rule is always right except for that one thing.
People who use that saying should be shipped off to the Gulags/Aushwitz in a metal box.FargoDog said:'Same difference'.
It makes.
No.
Sense.
I've tried saying this multiple times, but most people say "no youre wrong! If it gets used wrong enough, it is correct!" No. No it's not.Carlston said:others you can't force something wrong to be right by saying it over and over.
It's still religious, but people usually don't think of it that way because that's the way most people were raised.Ftaghn To You Too said:StonkThis said:It just annoys me. Maybe I don't want their god to bless me. It's hard to explain why I hate it so much.Jiraiya72 said:Dude, calm down. I'm not even religious and I say that. Why would you even get offended regardless, they are wanting their god to bless you. Even not being religious, it wouldn't hurt.StonkThis said:"God bless you"
When people say that when I sneeze, I want to punch them. Not everyone is religious or of that religion...
It's not even religious anymore. It's just good manners.
Why the term popular usage pisses me off.Jiraiya72 said:I've tried saying this multiple times, but most people say "no youre wrong! If it gets used wrong enough, it is correct!" No. No it's not.Carlston said:others you can't force something wrong to be right by saying it over and over.