I have figured it out!!!

Recommended Videos

Kevon Huggins

New member
Jan 27, 2011
289
0
0
I've figured it out!
Valve has discovered the magical powers of the number "2". When Valve creates a game with "2" in the title, it's automatically better than its predecessor. Sequels suck? No, Valve can apply the number "2" to make a game infinitely better.

Half-Life came, then Half-Life 2 came. Half-Life 2 is much more critically acclaimed.

Team Fortress the Quake mod came, then Team Fortress Classic, then when they added "2" to the title in the form of Team Fortress 2, which despite the hat surplus and tie-in promotion apocalypse, is still an extremely successful game.

Left 4 Dead came, then Left 4 Dead 2 came. This one may be cheating, as it pretty much copy-pasted the original game, replaced all the character/zombie models and voices, added in a few new SI, new campaigns, new items, and called it a day, but it's still much more popular than Left 4 Dead 1. In fact, it's so much more popular that virtually all of the maps, weapons, and survivors from the original game are also included in the sequel, with the exception of one lighthouse survival map.

And of course, Portal came, then Portal 2 came. Portal was an amazing game in the first place, very hard to top. Well, add a ton of new features including multiplayer, quadruple the game's length, expand the plot, triple the amount of utterly and completely hilarious characters (Glados/Wheatley/Cave), and somehow manage to create another new meme ("SPAAAACE"). You have... Portal 2.

If you want to tell me "Well you see, Tooie, you bumbling idiot, it's just because Valve knows how to greatly improve a game without changing anything drastic, which is why their sequels just work." Nope. The number "2" has mystical superpowers. It's the only explanation.

No wonder Valve is afraid of the number "3". It's probably tainted with dark magic to counteract the excellency of the number "2".
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
there are 2 rules of sequels. Rule 1, the first and third media(games, books, or films, TV series aren't really affected as far as I can tell) are good, and the middle one is terrible because it serves to tie in no 1 and no 3 together, and thus has a weak plot. Rule number 2, the first game is pretty good, the 2nd doesn't need to fill you in on everything and is bloody awesome, and then the third is terrible. Valve goes for Rule 2, but stops at game number 2, allowing consistant awesomeness.
 

ruben6f

New member
Mar 8, 2011
336
0
0
I liked Half-life 1 more than 2, I liked portal 1 more than 2, and since L4D2 is a copy paste with a few extra things it's better than 1.

Just my opinion but yes Valve titles with a 2 are very good.
 

ddq5

I wonder what the character limi
Jun 18, 2009
415
0
0
Well that's just like, your opinion man. Of those, I only thought HL2 and TF2 were the better successors; I preferred both the original Portal and Left 4 Dead. While they may be afraid of the number three (Trisaphobia), I don't think the evidence suggests a particular preference of the number two to one.
 

Hagi

New member
Apr 10, 2011
2,739
0
0
Couldn't they Make half-life 2 2 then? As in the second half-life 2. That's two 2s.

It's *mystical supernumber* times *mystical supernumber*. If your theory is correct then it will be the most amazingly awesome game ever.

Will it be the gaming singularity?