Queen Michael said:
"It doesn't rain much there, does it?"
"Three of four times a year."
"Wow, what must that have been like?" he wondered.
"Sunny," I told him.
The parts I've italicized (is that a real word?) are completely unnecessary. Removing them would have improved the text flow. So it's not just once.
Furthermore, you claim that if any other writer did this nobody would care. Actually, they would care very much. This is one of the most common complaints in writing; unnecessary words which were included for no reason.
Actually, when writing, you are supposed to say who is talking all the time, so the times Meyer
didn't say who was talking is the bad part. Read any book, and at the end of every line of dialogue is a said. An example, I'm going to pull out aa random book, and a random page: Chronicles of Narnia :
"Trumpkin.' said the Dwarf. 'Bringing the High King of Narnia out of the far past.'
The badgers nosed at the boys' hands. "At last," they said. "At last."
"Give us a light, friends," said Trumpkin
Further on, they all have 'saids' next to them. Are they breaking the flow of writing? When I wrote like that, my English teacher said that EVERY line of dialogue must be like that. Want another example? This time The Saga of Darren Shan (about vampires, how convenient.)
"You couldn't keep up." I protested. "We move too fast."
"Through dark tunnels, with the threat of the vampaneze ever present?" She smiled. "I doubt it."
"OK", I agreed, "you could probably match us for pace, but not endurance. We go all day, hour after hour, without pause. You'd tire and fall behind."
"Steve keeps up'" she noted
"Steve's trained himself to track them. Besides," I added, "Steve doesn't have t report to school every day."
Both are great books, and the 'flow breaking' bits telling you who's talking is necessary for today's literature.