SecretNegative said:
I thought trolling was being needlessly provocative to provoke a reaction, rather than being slightly hostile in the expression of ones opinion. But I guess definitions change, yes?
"Needlessly hostile" was how I interpreted your original posts, actually. Perhaps I was too quick to judge, and so I apologise.
SecretNegative said:
You seem to be a little touched about someone expressing their dislike on something you like, go your way to like or dislike anything you want, all the power to you, but don't try to argue against someone else's opinions, since obviously we all like different things.
It is not the fact that you dislike it that bothered me, it was the way you expressed that dislike. Like I said above, I mistook it for trolling, but apparently I was wrong and you were just expressing dislike in a slightly aggressive fashion.
SecretNegative said:
And we also seem to have a different opinion on what one could call "quality", I couldn't care less about what the X-men fandom says, since they themselves are rather biased about an X-Men cartoon. From what I've seen of it, it seems like a normal kids show, which pretty much equals bad in my eyes (there's a few great kids movies though, don't get me wrong).
Surely the X-Men fandom would be the best indicator as to the quality of the show
as it compares to other media representations of the franchise? Someone who has never seen any of the movies can't say they think the TV show was a good interpretation, because what are they comparing it to?
I also disagree that kids show = bad. Given the high number of television shows ostensibly aimed at children but which find an audience amongst adults, it seems being animated or aimed at younger people is no barrier to featuring good writing, characters or acting (voice or physical). Just because there are many programmes created on the basis of "kids are idiots who'll watch any old crap" doesn't mean
all of them are created with that in mind.
;
