I'm more concerned that no one has brought up how this might affect the local leopard seals. Won't anyone think about the leopard seals? Merciless killing-machines need love too D:RJ 17 said:Who do you think pushed the iceberg there in the first place?mtarzaim02 said:I wonder what the fishes in that area would think of this situation...
You talk as if 'natural outcome' is supposed to be some kind of sacred thing.Vendor-Lazarus said:Such is nature..
The Penguins can't be relocated by external choice but the iceberg can..until the next one appears.
Should we even intervene?
Climate change is happening and part of nature, but even if you believe that mankind is at fault should we throw another spanner into the natural outcome of any event and go further down the road of unnatural selection?
Sacred would be using the entirely wrong word and imply attributes and connotations that doesn't belong.Secondhand Revenant said:You talk as if 'natural outcome' is supposed to be some kind of sacred thing.Vendor-Lazarus said:Such is nature..
The Penguins can't be relocated by external choice but the iceberg can..until the next one appears.
Should we even intervene?
Climate change is happening and part of nature, but even if you believe that mankind is at fault should we throw another spanner into the natural outcome of any event and go further down the road of unnatural selection?
Well the connotations seem to be that it is somehow apart from us and should be left alone. Not only that but talking about the rules of the universe adds to the effect, given the only actual rules are of physics.Vendor-Lazarus said:Sacred would be using the entirely wrong word and imply attributes and connotations that doesn't belong.Secondhand Revenant said:You talk as if 'natural outcome' is supposed to be some kind of sacred thing.Vendor-Lazarus said:Such is nature..
The Penguins can't be relocated by external choice but the iceberg can..until the next one appears.
Should we even intervene?
Climate change is happening and part of nature, but even if you believe that mankind is at fault should we throw another spanner into the natural outcome of any event and go further down the road of unnatural selection?
We live in a universe with rules and those rules make it so that anything that can happen will happen and that which works will and that which doesn't won't.
In a way, it is apart from us. Yet not. Because we are aware of it happening, even to us, we can change it for ourselves and other things (including living things and non-living things).Secondhand Revenant said:Well the connotations seem to be that it is somehow apart from us and should be left alone. Not only that but talking about the rules of the universe adds to the effect, given the only actual rules are of physics.Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-Secondhand Revenant said:-snip-Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-
Our decisions to change it or not would just be a part of it. We aren't some sort of independent variable.Vendor-Lazarus said:In a way, it is apart from us. Yet not. Because we are aware of it happening, even to us, we can change it for ourselves and other things (including living things and non-living things).Secondhand Revenant said:Well the connotations seem to be that it is somehow apart from us and should be left alone. Not only that but talking about the rules of the universe adds to the effect, given the only actual rules are of physics.Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-Secondhand Revenant said:-snip-Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-
I don't know if it should be left alone, really.
If we intervene we do take on a sort of responsibility for it and take it out of a continuous natural state of evolution.
Granted, if we decided to abandon it again, nature would take up it's mantle again but probably in a much harsher way.
Evolution and macro-evolution would seem to be the best words to describe the phenomena.
Unless there is another term I'm not aware of.
I'd argue that we were entirely in it's thrall until we gained more and more sapience and the ability to radically alter our world and it's ecosystem at a whim.Secondhand Revenant said:Our decisions to change it or not would just be a part of it. We aren't some sort of independent variable.Vendor-Lazarus said:In a way, it is apart from us. Yet not. Because we are aware of it happening, even to us, we can change it for ourselves and other things (including living things and non-living things).Secondhand Revenant said:Well the connotations seem to be that it is somehow apart from us and should be left alone. Not only that but talking about the rules of the universe adds to the effect, given the only actual rules are of physics.Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-Secondhand Revenant said:-snip-Vendor-Lazarus said:-snip-
I don't know if it should be left alone, really.
If we intervene we do take on a sort of responsibility for it and take it out of a continuous natural state of evolution.
Granted, if we decided to abandon it again, nature would take up it's mantle again but probably in a much harsher way.
Evolution and macro-evolution would seem to be the best words to describe the phenomena.
Unless there is another term I'm not aware of.
We are part of it's 'continuous natural state of evolution' just as much as a predator or any other species they interact with is part of it. Evolution doesn't demand that the penguins die or something. It's something that happens regardless.