So this is kind of killing me. I'm not stupid, but I'm not well-read either (unfortunately). It would be great if an idiom-expert could explain to me the meaning of the phrase: "bow out".
And here is the context. There was a user on another forum that I had problems with. We started to exchange comebacks with each other when a certain intelligent-user (I more or less know his background) responded: "Best to bow-out, Antipunt".
The problem is I don't fully understand the meaning here. It could mean two things:
a) Mean-intention
'He's sharper than you...you might want to consider an embarrassing retreat before you are owned further...'
or
b) Kind/neutral-intention
'This isn't going to end well...you should make a -graceful- retreat while you still can from this mess'
Someone who is well-read could probably tell me the answer right away. Help would be appreciated, thanks. I basically need to know if I was dissed or 'aided'.
And here is the context. There was a user on another forum that I had problems with. We started to exchange comebacks with each other when a certain intelligent-user (I more or less know his background) responded: "Best to bow-out, Antipunt".
The problem is I don't fully understand the meaning here. It could mean two things:
a) Mean-intention
'He's sharper than you...you might want to consider an embarrassing retreat before you are owned further...'
or
b) Kind/neutral-intention
'This isn't going to end well...you should make a -graceful- retreat while you still can from this mess'
Someone who is well-read could probably tell me the answer right away. Help would be appreciated, thanks. I basically need to know if I was dissed or 'aided'.
EDIT: -Again thanks for the responses thus far-
The funny thing is that I'm getting two different opinions representing the two opposing sides as the moment. They are:
1) 'Quit while you're ahead / to leave with dignity'
and
2) To quit gracefully to avoid getting owned even further.
The problem is that the two interpretations deviate heavily with how I am supposed to receive it. Some users say it's an indirect dick move: 'better quit while you can buddy'. Other users say there is 'no evidence at all for trying to debase me'.
Thx for the help again; I was hoping for a definitive finish, though I can understand that people are confused because of the vague context. I'm not sure what I can add. Pretty much, it's just that he understates things all the time (talks with minimal emotion, even when he's sarcastic). The other thing to mention is that the nature of our 'arguments' weren't very 'mature'. It was basically indirect poop-slinging.
Thx. Sorry if this isn't enough info...