If Apple were to put out a game system,would you buy it?

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,403
4,193
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
they, pretty much, have already done that, Im not talking about the pipen, Im talking about the ipad, its a very over priced flash game player that doesnt play that well

and no I would not pay for one but I would gladly win one for free
 

Timi Pungracic

New member
Feb 3, 2011
34
0
0
Simalacrum said:
Timi Pungracic said:
Simalacrum said:
Ok, to correct a few people here:

The Pippin was a joint venture with Bandai. They didn't have full control over the product. Furthermore Apple is a very different company to what it was back then.
Whats this about 'every few months'? It may be a joke, but cmon, thats a bit unfair. Besides isn't incremental updates something that is happening already? PS2/3 Slim, 360 Slim, Wii without Wifi to make it cheaper, goodness knows how many PSP/DS iterations...
Sure, a lot of Apple products are expensive, but look at the iPad; competitors are really struggling to meet that match point. Apple can do affordable products; they're just affordable based on their quality, similar to the PS3 which crams a lot more stuff into a slightly more expensive package.

I would make such a decision depending on what the finished product looked like. I certainly don't make a judgement based on rumours and assumptions, Apple is no exception. However, considering I'm an Apple head, and they generally make very good quality products, I'd say yeah sure, I'd probably jump in the bandwagon. Of course, they'd have to cater to the more 'mature' *cough* market before I'd be willing to get one... good games make or break a console, after all.
1. there is a difference beetwen a free update/new better verson of something that doesnt make the version before obsolete, and a new console every few months

2.they are expensive because they are apple products, no other reason

3.competitors struggle to match the iPad? Only on the commercial level, i have seen better tablets that were for half the price and even had extras

4. affordable based on their quality? Daaaaaamn.. then my computer should cost 20.000$

5. I have almost never seen a mature apple fanboy
1. Apple does annual updates. And besides, most other companies in the computer industry bring out some new version of something every year too. Doesn't mean you have to get them.

2. They're expensive because they're well made. Furthermore, Apple also innovates and changes markets; MP3 players, tablets and phones were all dramatically changed by Apple. I'd rather pay a little bit more money to a company that tries something new, than pay less to a company that does the same-old year after year.

3. You've seen tablets half the price with extras. Have you actually tried using one of them? Pretty much all the Android tablets I've laid my hands on so far have felt clunky, slow, and complicated, despite their fancy attachments and big numbers. Besides the newest iPad is by far the most portable tablet of them all, which is incredibly important for a, well, portable device. You're not really going to be messing around with a USB stick on-the-move, in real life scenarios, so such features are kinda useless (as are cameras). And all these tablets either matched or exceeded the base model iPad in price wait a minute, I meant the opposite! A lot of them exceeded the top-range iPad models, sorry about that :p. Anything cheaper generally sacrificed significant features, like screen size.

4. Quality as in build quality, looks, feel, etc. Which, I always argue, is far more important than people give credit for; do people say that the looks and feel of a car don't matter? No, the looks of a car are a very important feature. So why should a computer be made of ugly black/grey plastic and be judged only on speed and practicalities? Macs are expensive because they feel nice to use, with their back-lit keyboards and aluminium finish, as well as their easy-to-use, fancy OS.

5. I hope I've made an impression as a 'mature' Apple fanboy. However, I wasn't referring to 'mature' on that level; I was referring to the type of games 'mature' gamers play, aka. 'hardcore' games (I hate that term so I avoid using it whenever possible). I wouldn't buy a Mac console if all it had was Farmville :p
this is getting so long xD

1. does annual updates that you MUST get and renders anything before obsolete, not with oher companies

2. I'd rather buy from someone who does something old but make it good, than something new and innovative that's utter shit(not saying that apple products are shit)

3. yes i tried using them, they were better actually, and some extras turned them actually into a laptop(the extras were usually free)

4. looks are important.. for some things. I dn't care however how pretty my computer is, and i sure as hell won't pay 80% of the price for the preetines

5. And most hardcore game playing people I see are teenagers, that shout in their mic for every single thing that happens

sorry for all my punctuation mistakes and so on
 

Professor James

Elite Member
Aug 5, 2010
1,698
0
41
I might buy it after a few months maybe a year but only if

- it doesn't cost too much

-has a good lineup of games

- won't have a new edition announced by the time i'm about to buy it.
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,253
0
0
They already have a system with the iOS devices.

If they released a home console, however... my dad would probably buy it anyway. He's a bit of a fanboy. Though I wouldn't mind, as long as it works well and has good games.
 

Pharsalus

New member
Jun 16, 2011
330
0
0
Not a chance. It would almost certainly be an overpriced, underpowered piece of modern art, hyped up with all the arrogance of the Apple pr machine. If it were the last console on the planet I'd go back to reading books more often.
 

Sinclair Solutions

New member
Jul 22, 2010
1,611
0
0
Unless they actually have good games that gives me a good reason to buy it, I will most likely pass. I love Apple products, but I have an XBox 360 and I am quite content with it. I still am on the fence about buying a PS3. inFamous and Uncharted and God of War look nice, but are they enough of a reason to spend hundred of dollars on another console? Still not sold.
 

Tommeh Brownleh

New member
May 26, 2011
278
0
0
It would be a shiny white console, only be able to use downloaded games, and the controller would only have one button. No thank you. Also it would be outdated within a month of it's release knowing apple.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Jacco said:
Say they announced the iConsole tomorrow and had 2 or 3 good games to launch it with like Microsoft did when they released the Xbox. Would you spend the money to buy it?

For extra features, I think it would be cool if it could sync with iTunes and had features like the Apple TV where you could download shows and iOS apps and games and stuff.


Also what do you think they would call it? iConsole sounds kinda boring.

Edit: I did not know about the Pippin. My bad.
I already own an iPod and a Mac, and a console with a solid line-up of games, so why would I need to spend more money?
 

Gitty101

New member
Jan 22, 2010
960
0
0
No. It would be overpriced, have very few games that matter (if any) and would be rendered obsolete by a new model frequently.
 

pspman45

New member
Sep 1, 2010
703
0
0
No, they would release the new model in 3 months and charge me full price
And they would keep asking me if I want to buy Angry Birds

NO I DO NOT WANT TO BUY ANGRY BIRDS, NOW STOP RECOMMENDING IT!
 

Gudrests

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,204
0
0
kidd25 said:
Vhite said:
No because I don't have any children to sacrafice.
i hear they take souls as payment.
I think you need 4+ souls to equal 1 child. Children can work in sweatshops....souls cant.

OP: HELL NO.....PC gamer mean anything....or just...broke :)
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
Timi Pungracic said:
Simalacrum said:
Timi Pungracic said:
Simalacrum said:
Ok, to correct a few people here:

The Pippin was a joint venture with Bandai. They didn't have full control over the product. Furthermore Apple is a very different company to what it was back then.
Whats this about 'every few months'? It may be a joke, but cmon, thats a bit unfair. Besides isn't incremental updates something that is happening already? PS2/3 Slim, 360 Slim, Wii without Wifi to make it cheaper, goodness knows how many PSP/DS iterations...
Sure, a lot of Apple products are expensive, but look at the iPad; competitors are really struggling to meet that match point. Apple can do affordable products; they're just affordable based on their quality, similar to the PS3 which crams a lot more stuff into a slightly more expensive package.

I would make such a decision depending on what the finished product looked like. I certainly don't make a judgement based on rumours and assumptions, Apple is no exception. However, considering I'm an Apple head, and they generally make very good quality products, I'd say yeah sure, I'd probably jump in the bandwagon. Of course, they'd have to cater to the more 'mature' *cough* market before I'd be willing to get one... good games make or break a console, after all.
1. there is a difference beetwen a free update/new better verson of something that doesnt make the version before obsolete, and a new console every few months

2.they are expensive because they are apple products, no other reason

3.competitors struggle to match the iPad? Only on the commercial level, i have seen better tablets that were for half the price and even had extras

4. affordable based on their quality? Daaaaaamn.. then my computer should cost 20.000$

5. I have almost never seen a mature apple fanboy
1. Apple does annual updates. And besides, most other companies in the computer industry bring out some new version of something every year too. Doesn't mean you have to get them.

2. They're expensive because they're well made. Furthermore, Apple also innovates and changes markets; MP3 players, tablets and phones were all dramatically changed by Apple. I'd rather pay a little bit more money to a company that tries something new, than pay less to a company that does the same-old year after year.

3. You've seen tablets half the price with extras. Have you actually tried using one of them? Pretty much all the Android tablets I've laid my hands on so far have felt clunky, slow, and complicated, despite their fancy attachments and big numbers. Besides the newest iPad is by far the most portable tablet of them all, which is incredibly important for a, well, portable device. You're not really going to be messing around with a USB stick on-the-move, in real life scenarios, so such features are kinda useless (as are cameras). And all these tablets either matched or exceeded the base model iPad in price wait a minute, I meant the opposite! A lot of them exceeded the top-range iPad models, sorry about that :p. Anything cheaper generally sacrificed significant features, like screen size.

4. Quality as in build quality, looks, feel, etc. Which, I always argue, is far more important than people give credit for; do people say that the looks and feel of a car don't matter? No, the looks of a car are a very important feature. So why should a computer be made of ugly black/grey plastic and be judged only on speed and practicalities? Macs are expensive because they feel nice to use, with their back-lit keyboards and aluminium finish, as well as their easy-to-use, fancy OS.

5. I hope I've made an impression as a 'mature' Apple fanboy. However, I wasn't referring to 'mature' on that level; I was referring to the type of games 'mature' gamers play, aka. 'hardcore' games (I hate that term so I avoid using it whenever possible). I wouldn't buy a Mac console if all it had was Farmville :p
this is getting so long xD

1. does annual updates that you MUST get and renders anything before obsolete, not with oher companies

2. I'd rather buy from someone who does something old but make it good, than something new and innovative that's utter shit(not saying that apple products are shit)

3. yes i tried using them, they were better actually, and some extras turned them actually into a laptop(the extras were usually free)

4. looks are important.. for some things. I dn't care however how pretty my computer is, and i sure as hell won't pay 80% of the price for the preetines

5. And most hardcore game playing people I see are teenagers, that shout in their mic for every single thing that happens

sorry for all my punctuation mistakes and so on
It is getting long, but I can keep on going! >:D

1. Annual updates does not mean the old version being obsolete. My MacBook Pro isn't as snappy as the newest version, not does it have Thunderbolt, but it still runs the latest software. Apple still sells the last-gen iPhone as cheaper alternatives too, and they work perfectly fine. "Obsolete" is something like the Touchpad, which won't be receiving any more support at all.

2. Apple products aren't shit is the thing, but still new and innovative ;)

3. My personal experience with Android tablets has been that of frustration. Classic example: I was using a Motorola Xoom, and I couldn't even work out how to type a the web address on the browser. Furthermore, point about tablets is that their not meant to be laptops; laptops are too heavy and big to be practical for portability. In essence, their the next-gen desktops nowadays. Having extras is pointless if they're not useful in day-to-day use. Using the camera on any tablet makes you look like a bit stupid, and stuff like USB drives are, well, actually closing in on being obsolete now with cloud storage and whatnot. Why add features you never use, even if they are free? Its pointless.

4. I sense you're over-exaggerating the price... on average a Mac might be about 30% more expensive than an equivalent product (well, for computers at least). Style and looks are only part of the equation; I also prefer the Mac for its software.

5. Which is why I said 'mature' games with the ' ' marks, to suggest sarcasm :p nevertheless its those kind of games that I play more. You know, the Fallouts, Call of Duties and Grand Theft Auto's of the gaming world.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
No because they're a over controlling over-charging company who'd only restrict what I and others do with their devices.

After the bs I've gone through with their shitty ipod touch and the crap I've gone through helping my friend with his awful Mac I've no intention of buying anything from them ever.
 

DirgeNovak

I'm anticipating DmC. Flame me.
Jul 23, 2008
1,645
0
0
I'd have to see specs, and more importantly, price.
neonsword13-ops said:
No, because Apple would introduce a new model every three months, rendering the last model Obsolete.
Also this. They seriously need to stop pulling this shit if they want to earn my trust and patronage.
 

uzo

New member
Jul 5, 2011
710
0
0
No, because Apple (the company) represents everything I despise about tech companies rolled into one attractively packaged, seductively curved, evil-inspired gestalt entity.

Pretentious fucks.

I have an iPhone though ... but that's mainly because I need rapid multi-lingual access and it was the one my wife wanted (happy wife, happy life).
 

Timi Pungracic

New member
Feb 3, 2011
34
0
0
Simalacrum said:
Timi Pungracic said:
Simalacrum said:
Timi Pungracic said:
Simalacrum said:
Ok, to correct a few people here:

The Pippin was a joint venture with Bandai. They didn't have full control over the product. Furthermore Apple is a very different company to what it was back then.
Whats this about 'every few months'? It may be a joke, but cmon, thats a bit unfair. Besides isn't incremental updates something that is happening already? PS2/3 Slim, 360 Slim, Wii without Wifi to make it cheaper, goodness knows how many PSP/DS iterations...
Sure, a lot of Apple products are expensive, but look at the iPad; competitors are really struggling to meet that match point. Apple can do affordable products; they're just affordable based on their quality, similar to the PS3 which crams a lot more stuff into a slightly more expensive package.

I would make such a decision depending on what the finished product looked like. I certainly don't make a judgement based on rumours and assumptions, Apple is no exception. However, considering I'm an Apple head, and they generally make very good quality products, I'd say yeah sure, I'd probably jump in the bandwagon. Of course, they'd have to cater to the more 'mature' *cough* market before I'd be willing to get one... good games make or break a console, after all.
1. there is a difference beetwen a free update/new better verson of something that doesnt make the version before obsolete, and a new console every few months

2.they are expensive because they are apple products, no other reason

3.competitors struggle to match the iPad? Only on the commercial level, i have seen better tablets that were for half the price and even had extras

4. affordable based on their quality? Daaaaaamn.. then my computer should cost 20.000$

5. I have almost never seen a mature apple fanboy
1. Apple does annual updates. And besides, most other companies in the computer industry bring out some new version of something every year too. Doesn't mean you have to get them.

2. They're expensive because they're well made. Furthermore, Apple also innovates and changes markets; MP3 players, tablets and phones were all dramatically changed by Apple. I'd rather pay a little bit more money to a company that tries something new, than pay less to a company that does the same-old year after year.

3. You've seen tablets half the price with extras. Have you actually tried using one of them? Pretty much all the Android tablets I've laid my hands on so far have felt clunky, slow, and complicated, despite their fancy attachments and big numbers. Besides the newest iPad is by far the most portable tablet of them all, which is incredibly important for a, well, portable device. You're not really going to be messing around with a USB stick on-the-move, in real life scenarios, so such features are kinda useless (as are cameras). And all these tablets either matched or exceeded the base model iPad in price wait a minute, I meant the opposite! A lot of them exceeded the top-range iPad models, sorry about that :p. Anything cheaper generally sacrificed significant features, like screen size.

4. Quality as in build quality, looks, feel, etc. Which, I always argue, is far more important than people give credit for; do people say that the looks and feel of a car don't matter? No, the looks of a car are a very important feature. So why should a computer be made of ugly black/grey plastic and be judged only on speed and practicalities? Macs are expensive because they feel nice to use, with their back-lit keyboards and aluminium finish, as well as their easy-to-use, fancy OS.

5. I hope I've made an impression as a 'mature' Apple fanboy. However, I wasn't referring to 'mature' on that level; I was referring to the type of games 'mature' gamers play, aka. 'hardcore' games (I hate that term so I avoid using it whenever possible). I wouldn't buy a Mac console if all it had was Farmville :p
this is getting so long xD

1. does annual updates that you MUST get and renders anything before obsolete, not with oher companies

2. I'd rather buy from someone who does something old but make it good, than something new and innovative that's utter shit(not saying that apple products are shit)

3. yes i tried using them, they were better actually, and some extras turned them actually into a laptop(the extras were usually free)

4. looks are important.. for some things. I dn't care however how pretty my computer is, and i sure as hell won't pay 80% of the price for the preetines

5. And most hardcore game playing people I see are teenagers, that shout in their mic for every single thing that happens

sorry for all my punctuation mistakes and so on
It is getting long, but I can keep on going! >:D

1. Annual updates does not mean the old version being obsolete. My MacBook Pro isn't as snappy as the newest version, not does it have Thunderbolt, but it still runs the latest software. Apple still sells the last-gen iPhone as cheaper alternatives too, and they work perfectly fine. "Obsolete" is something like the Touchpad, which won't be receiving any more support at all.

2. Apple products aren't shit is the thing, but still new and innovative ;)

3. My personal experience with Android tablets has been that of frustration. Classic example: I was using a Motorola Xoom, and I couldn't even work out how to type a the web address on the browser. Furthermore, point about tablets is that their not meant to be laptops; laptops are too heavy and big to be practical for portability. In essence, their the next-gen desktops nowadays. Having extras is pointless if they're not useful in day-to-day use. Using the camera on any tablet makes you look like a bit stupid, and stuff like USB drives are, well, actually closing in on being obsolete now with cloud storage and whatnot. Why add features you never use, even if they are free? Its pointless.

4. I sense you're over-exaggerating the price... on average a Mac might be about 30% more expensive than an equivalent product (well, for computers at least). Style and looks are only part of the equation; I also prefer the Mac for its software.

5. Which is why I said 'mature' games with the ' ' marks, to suggest sarcasm :p nevertheless its those kind of games that I play more. You know, the Fallouts, Call of Duties and Grand Theft Auto's of the gaming world.
it's more that other people cant keep up xD

1. actually with the macs it DOES mean it's obsolete, new software not compatible with 3 year old macs... shit my pc is old 7 years i think

2. new, of yourse, innovative not really

3. why must i have such a bad memory, used one tablet, i don't think it was android based even, forgot the god damn name, it was surely not a big name developer

4. not really, my computer costed no more than 800? i think, but it can run new games and software at a pretty good rate(got a solid 60 fps out of crysis 2 with most settings high)

5. only hardcore game in there was call of duty, other games are already a bit more sophisticated and dont hold the players hand throughout the game in fear he might get lost(yes i'm calling gta a sophisticated game)
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
No, because it would be even more controlling and unmoddable than the 360. And if it broke, it would probably be unfixable. I'll stick with my lovely PC, thank you very much.