Your absolutely right. The PC and it's availability of 2 decades of backwards compatibility utterly destroys consoles. Honestly, doing a cost/value analysis on a single game is retarded.
I know I am right, and retarded is not being able to work out that
a). Batman AA was being used as a benchmark, a factor that is common amongst the things being compared as it is available for all formats and is a fairly new game. I mean I could compare Crysis on PC to Drakes Deception on PS3 but given that they are format exclusive it would be a tad f*cking pointless.
b). That for the price of the PC listed as a recommended spec to play Batman AA you could buy a 60Gig PS3, which will give you access to a decade and a half of games spread over two of the most successful home consoles in history, and you would still have enough cash left over to buy an XBox 360 and a Wii.
Of course I am sure you have a point somewhere that you are trying to make, but let me repeat the statement I made.
YOU CANNOT BUILD A GAMING PC FOR LESS THEN THE COST OF A GAMING CONSOLE AND HAVE IT DELIVER A GAMING EXPERIENCE OF A SIMILAR QUALITY. FACT!
oh and two decades of backwards compatibility is not an argument, it is a weak ineffective stab at retort which fails at the first step as anyone who has tried to run a 1997 game on a Win 7 PC will be able to tell you.