Didn't realize this was sarcasm to be honest. To give you some credit, it SHOULD have been obvious, except there's 20 million of these every other week that are dead serious... so it makes a bit hard to tell when people are being serious or sarcastic.TheRealCJ said:Of course I'm upset, I set up a perfectly good "think up of some silly words to call ourselves" thread, and people think I'm being serious.
I'm not entirely sure whether you're being sarcastic or not anymore, because, again, this is something not unlike what I've read as absolutely straight faced before, but if you ARE serious: All of those can be changed. And even if you don't want to change them, I'm guessing you're smart enough to realize these aren't "genre limitations".RAKtheUndead said:Unfortunately, that's exactly what I am. Grotesquely ugly, absolutely incapable of the slightest semblance of social interaction, incredibly single-minded about the acquisition of knowledge. So, I fall by default into that category.
Ahem... that there is a pretty man. And I'm into women.TimeLord said:I agree but at the same time, appalled by your stereotype of geeks. The description you make is how geeks are shown in any Hollywood movie you care to mention. Not how [most] geeks are today.TheRealCJ said:It used to be that the few of us who were known as nerds or geeks were fashionably unconscious, smart, and social outcasts. And we didn't care
I am not a social outcast. I am smart, yes (more than anybody else in my social circle at least).
But fashionably unconscious?
![]()
Never!
Well myself dressed as David Tennant seems to have that effect on this site it would seem.TheWwwizard said:snip
Born March 29, 1991TheRealCJ said:I
(/angry old man rant)
I assume you have a name, no? Oh, and look at that, you have an escapist profile! with a picture and everything!Sexual Harassment Panda said:I have no idea what you're talking about, but good luck with needing to label yourself...
Thank you sir, I enjoyed that rantCaliostro said:So, to you, "geeks" are socially inept functionally retarded uglier than sin virgins with all the tact and charm of down's syndrome? And this was the group you chose to associate yourself with? My god, that's a group I'd RUN from. Even if I was the ugliest person on this planet.TheRealCJ said:It used to be that the few of us who were known as nerds or geeks were fashionably unconscious, smart, and social outcasts. And we didn't care.
But now it seems the term "geek" has been hijacked by hipsters wanting to break away from the old archetypes. Everywhere now I see "ironic" retro gaming t-shirts, jewelry made from video game cartridges,store bought steampunk gear and worse, being worn by the kind of people I spent my childhood years playing videogames to get AWAY from. You know, the fucking Beautiful People.
So I propose a new word for the socially malnourished outcasts I associate with. Let's have some suggestions!
(/angry old man rant)
First and foremost let me front the idea that social labels are always a negative point to your character (or, more specifically, lack there of). You identify yourself with a certain "label" ("geeks", "jocks", "goths", "metalheads", whatever) because you're either too simple, or too incompetent, or too scared, to simple accept yourself as whatever you are. It IS easier to follow. It is easier to simply look at a set of predetermined standards and just blindly follow those than be who you are. First because no matter how shitty things get with everyone else, you have bought yourself a support group through your subservience. "You join us, we'll back you up!" is the unspoken contract of these things. Second because you just don't have to think... Thinking is such a tiresome thing. You have to decide what you stand up for, what you like, what you dislike, what you want, what you feel... Every bloody minute of every day... Over everything... Isn't that tiresome? So much easier if someone else just does it for you, and you just subscribe to their newsletter.
Why? Why must we bear this crux of penance, this sword of damocles, that if we happen to enjoy something we must immediately adhere to whatever other tastes the loudest group of fanatics happen to advocate? Can't I not enjoy a game without being a socially maladjusted 300 lb piece of ugly who instantly ejaculates the moments he comes within 5 ft of a female? Am I forced to lobotomise myself, say "bro" five times per sentence, and become incapable of tackling any situation that isn't solved by punching if I enjoy playing sports?
Can't you be healthy, socially adjusted AND enjoy gaming? Are we so pathetically shallow that we can't enjoy the things we enjoy? That we need to constantly evaluate whom else shares tastes with us, so we can better fit this ridiculous notion we created for ourselves based on a pre-determined model?
If you enjoy games, enjoy your fucking game. Why does it matter who else enjoys it? If you suddenly discovered the worst person in the world enjoyed your favourite activity, would you stop?
/rant.
Thank you sir, I enjoyed that rantCaliostro said:So, to you, "geeks" are socially inept functionally retarded uglier than sin virgins with all the tact and charm of down's syndrome? And this was the group you chose to associate yourself with? My god, that's a group I'd RUN from. Even if I was the ugliest person on this planet.TheRealCJ said:It used to be that the few of us who were known as nerds or geeks were fashionably unconscious, smart, and social outcasts. And we didn't care.
But now it seems the term "geek" has been hijacked by hipsters wanting to break away from the old archetypes. Everywhere now I see "ironic" retro gaming t-shirts, jewelry made from video game cartridges,store bought steampunk gear and worse, being worn by the kind of people I spent my childhood years playing videogames to get AWAY from. You know, the fucking Beautiful People.
So I propose a new word for the socially malnourished outcasts I associate with. Let's have some suggestions!
(/angry old man rant)
First and foremost let me front the idea that social labels are always a negative point to your character (or, more specifically, lack there of). You identify yourself with a certain "label" ("geeks", "jocks", "goths", "metalheads", whatever) because you're either too simple, or too incompetent, or too scared, to simple accept yourself as whatever you are. It IS easier to follow. It is easier to simply look at a set of predetermined standards and just blindly follow those than be who you are. First because no matter how shitty things get with everyone else, you have bought yourself a support group through your subservience. "You join us, we'll back you up!" is the unspoken contract of these things. Second because you just don't have to think... Thinking is such a tiresome thing. You have to decide what you stand up for, what you like, what you dislike, what you want, what you feel... Every bloody minute of every day... Over everything... Isn't that tiresome? So much easier if someone else just does it for you, and you just subscribe to their newsletter.
Why? Why must we bear this crux of penance, this sword of damocles, that if we happen to enjoy something we must immediately adhere to whatever other tastes the loudest group of fanatics happen to advocate? Can't I not enjoy a game without being a socially maladjusted 300 lb piece of ugly who instantly ejaculates the moments he comes within 5 ft of a female? Am I forced to lobotomise myself, say "bro" five times per sentence, and become incapable of tackling any situation that isn't solved by punching if I enjoy playing sports?
Can't you be healthy, socially adjusted AND enjoy gaming? Are we so pathetically shallow that we can't enjoy the things we enjoy? That we need to constantly evaluate whom else shares tastes with us, so we can better fit this ridiculous notion we created for ourselves based on a pre-determined model?
If you enjoy games, enjoy your fucking game. Why does it matter who else enjoys it? If you suddenly discovered the worst person in the world enjoyed your favourite activity, would you stop?
/rant.
Nice suit manTimeLord said:I agree but at the same time, appalled by your stereotype of geeks. The description you make is how geeks are shown in any Hollywood movie you care to mention. Not how [most] geeks are today.TheRealCJ said:It used to be that the few of us who were known as nerds or geeks were fashionably unconscious, smart, and social outcasts. And we didn't care
I am not a social outcast. I am smart, yes (more than anybody else in my social circle at least).
But fashionably unconscious?
![]()
Never!
I have no idea what you're talking about either, so I'll just assume I should be offended.Lullabye said:I assume you have a name, no? Oh, and look at that, you have an escapist profile! with a picture and everything!Sexual Harassment Panda said:I have no idea what you're talking about, but good luck with needing to label yourself...
OT: fuck the hipsters(no matter how bad I want to be one), we geeks rule the ironic and unordinary!
Wow, those clothes are awesome. But why those shoes? Use black or brown ones <_<.TimeLord said:I agree but at the same time, appalled by your stereotype of geeks. The description you make is how geeks are shown in any Hollywood movie you care to mention. Not how [most] geeks are today.
I am not a social outcast. I am smart, yes (more than anybody else in my social circle at least).
But fashionably unconscious?
![]()
Never!
I didn't have black or brown ones at the timeOscar Bjorklund said:Wow, those clothes are awesome. But why those shoes? Use black or brown ones <_<.
Good ^^TimeLord said:I didn't have black or brown ones at the time![]()
I do now. And I hope it will snow this year so I can get a better picture![]()