eyepatchdreams said:
I could see HVG being used and readily available.... But, Blu-ray is still in its infantile stage at this point in its life.
Why? Why would anyone need one item with one fixed data-set of6 terabytes? SIX THOUSAND GIGABYTES!!!?!
That's several orders of magnitude more than any High definition movie. It would be worthless to have a compilation of movies as you couldn't watch one while another is lent to someone else, or they want to watch in another room. It's a nightmare to sort and what about cost?!? instead of slowly building a film collection with each decision being a few dollars they'd have to spend HUNDREDS of dollars up front for a compilation where very likely a large proportion of films they simply won't care about.
It's worthless trying to put films of higher definition on discs, as Blu-Ray already has more detail than we can actually resolve - that is, the way we actually view films. I mean the average person is NOT going to have a 75-inch HDTV in every room, and it would NEED to be that big for all the pixels that are on there too be large enough to actually be resolved.
The alternative is to sit closer to the screen and I mean REALLY close. I mean within 4 feet of a 30 inch screen, so much that if fills you vision quite completely.
Holographic discs. Pah, like Laser buggy whips. An advanced technique for and obsolete mode of technology.
Blu-ray is going to be the absolute pinnacle of home video until somehow people are convinced to buy MASSIVE televisions, OR internet inevitably catches up. I think the latter will happen first as ridiculously gigantic TVs have to pass the wife test and they don't want massive cinema screen in their living room.
I doubt you could sell to many a technology suite offering detail so fine that the human eye cannot perceive it.