Actually War of The Worlds did. Spielberg even deliberately used 9/11 imagery such as the ash on people's faces and clothes, and the board with the missing people's names on it. This, combined with the panic of being under constant attack by a devastating enemy, gave that film a terrifying, yet grounded, atmosphere. I know most people don't like it, but I find it pretty underrated.deeper into the dark side of post-9/11 anxieties in a manner that no mainstream genre film had yet dared
irector Steven Spielberg says his version of the 1898 H.G. Wells novel about hostile alien invaders reflects American anxiety over the threat of Middle Eastern terrorists infiltrating the USA and causing mass devastation like the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
"Every iteration of War of the Worlds has occurred in times of uncertainty," he says. "We live under a veil of fear that we didn't live under before 9/11. There has been a conscious emotional shift in this country."
As mechanized tripods crawl across civilization, zapping people to dust inside their clothes and toppling buildings, War of the Worlds includes many images as indelible as the 9/11 attacks.
The dust-caked faces of thousands of terrified, fleeing citizens. The hundreds of "Have You Seen ... ?" posters with photos and contact information for loved ones trying to find the lost. One line of dialogue ? "Did you lose anybody?" ? was a common New York greeting at the time.
Orson Welles' infamous 1938 radio version, which caused panic on the East Coast among people who thought it was real, "preyed upon American fears of Hitler running rampant over eastern Europe," Spielberg says. 1953's movie version produced by George Pal was fueled by Cold War hysteria and the threat of nuclear destruction.
New York Post critic Lou Lumenick had mixed feelings about Spielberg's film but says using 9/11 imagery was "a valid form of artistic expression."
"I don't think any subject is off-limits, depending on how it's handled," Lumenick says. "If Spielberg had planes crashing into towers, I think that would upset a lot more people."
Village Voice critic Michael Atkinson says the images might be coming too soon for many New Yorkers.
"It might be just a matter of how close you were to Ground Zero that day," Atkinson says. "That might determine how much you're ready to have those things be used as aspects of mass entertainment."
I agree. 3 pretty much wrapped everything up, even if it did stumble across the finish line, so when I heard Raimi and Co. wanted to do a fourth, part of me was skeptical.Casual Shinji said:I'm actually glad their not making a new Spidey with the original cast or with Raimi at the helm.
I love the first 2 movies, but by the 3rd one you could tell everyone was getting really tired of reprising the same role. Tobey Maguire didn't really have that boyish enthusiasm anymore which made him so endearing in the the first 2 movies, Kirsten Dunst started to look old, and Danny Elfman and John Dykstra were either dropped or left the production. The later of which I'm sure nobody was really bothered with but me.
I don't have any hopes for the reboot, but I'm glad the original was laid to rest.
So, making movies you don't like apparently makes him a douchebag now?mireko said:Also: Michael Bay is, and always has been, a massive douchebag.
It's not just that I don't like them, after watching Transformers I felt like I had just become a worse person. Like it had burned away a part of my brain that I could never get back.JourneyThroughHell said:So, making movies you don't like apparently makes him a douchebag now?mireko said:Also: Michael Bay is, and always has been, a massive douchebag.
Or do you have any other, more susbtantial reasons?
OT: I have noticed that most of those have to do with superhero movies. And most of those don't really seem like news THAT bad.
Well, that's not the problem with Bay, but with your self-perception.mireko said:It's not just that I don't like them, after watching Transformers I felt like I had just become a worse person. Like it had burned away a part of my brain that I could never get back.
No substantial reasons though, I obviously don't know the guy.
Well, it's also the opinion of just about every actor who's ever worked under him...JourneyThroughHell said:So, making movies you don't like apparently makes him a douchebag now?mireko said:Also: Michael Bay is, and always has been, a massive douchebag.
Or do you have any other, more susbtantial reasons?