I'm worried games might be getting too inexpensive

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Gorfias said:
Yeah, but you still need to have them downloaded. I'll likley pull the trigger ASAP and buy a 2 T drive. Then I have to rebuild the whole bloody thing. Unless I can steer steam into loading the games onto the 2T set up as just a storage device.
I have all my games installed to an internal 2 TB HDD added after I created my computer. I'm not sure what the problem would be.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Gorfias said:
I agree that $5 for a game that came out in 2009 and no one is buying anymore anyway is good money. But 2 things:
1) I use steam for more than games sold by steam, including Humble Bundle. Lots a crap, but some great stuff too averaging about $1 in cost.
Which is awesome for Steam as it gets and keeps people using their service. This is a fairly standard business practice.

2) At that cost, I can't see often paying even $20 for a newer game. And I now have 127 Games on Steam! When will I have time? And if no one has time for new games, that has to be a bad thing.

ITMT: they still got me for $60 for GTA5. And plenty of people are telling me Steam is doing fine.
Well, you've already pointed out the flaw there. You can't imagine paying full price for a game. Unless you can. Which you have. Or will...Is GTA V even announced yet for PC?
The thing is, most of the major sales are for old games everyone's already played. One of Steam's dirty little secrets is that many of these prices are what you'd expect to pay if Steam depreciated more naturally like a physical service. They go down after the demand, or they do it to promote games of questionable quality. I can't tell you how often their daily sales are for games flooded with complaints about them being broken and unplayable BEFORE the sale hits.

People psychologically feel more drawn to these sales because of the timer, which seems to supersede common sense.

If you wait, fair enough. So do I. I've been trained to wait for price cuts. But games are still doing big bank day 1.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Vigormortis said:
lacktheknack said:
Microsoft may be losing money on Xbox (which I doubt, or they wouldn't continue it), but Nintendo certainly isn't. Seeing Valve's recent expansions, I doubt they're hurting either.
Believe it or not, Microsoft has been consistently losing money on their Xbox brands. They cost more to make than they gain from selling them.

However, Microsoft easily recoups it's losses through licensing fees, hosting fees, and software sales through the Xbox brands.

Many hardware producers/providers utilize this method.
I thought people meant the whole brand.

If it's just the console itself, then I'm literally the least surprised person in the world right now.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
This thread a joke?

If Valve was making too little on each game... wouldn't they just raise the price of their games?

Do you think they charge so little out of charity? They charge those prices because they think it benefits them to do so, whether in the short run or long run. And they aren't in trouble financially by any indications.
 

Fireaxe

New member
Sep 30, 2013
300
0
0
Macroplasm said:
It should be noted that games make more money when distributed digitally.
This is actually really important.

You can distribute digitally and sell cheaper while still making the same profit, production and transport costs for physical medium are expensive and you can probably start losing money if you make too many discs (an issue a digital platform doesn't have); the effort that goes into lining up forecasts and actual physical disc distribution by film distributors is quite significant and I can imagine that the same occurs with video games.
 

Strelok

New member
Dec 22, 2012
494
0
0
Vigormortis said:
However, Microsoft easily recoups it's losses through licensing fees, hosting fees, and software sales through the Xbox brands.

Many hardware producers/providers utilize this method.
Actually that is incorrect, Microsoft apparently loses billions due to the entertainment division made up for by Android patent royalties apparently.

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-earns-2-billion-per-year-from-android-patent-royalties-2013-11

In fact one of the investors that wants to dump XBox and Microsoft games was just given a seat on the board.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/31/microsoft_valueact_ballmer/

The new CEO candidate Stephen Elop is rumored to not exactly be an XBox fan as well.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/8/5080192/microsoft-ceo-candidate-stephen-elop-bing-xbox-rumors

Directionless said:
Just a little OT post, but how in god's name does the PS3 have more than double the amount of online accounts than Xbox? Is it because They only take into account XBOX Gold accounts? If so, that's an incredibly misleading number. If not, WTF?
No idea, could be a lot of reasons though, just because XBox is big in North America, does not mean it is big elsewhere. I believe Microsoft is still struggling breaking into Asia, but this would only be guesses. I am multi-platform for many years, PC + Sony's system. Pretty sure that Playstation is popular amongst PC primary, console secondary gamers, also just a guess. The article is active accounts so signed in once a week or bi-weekly, so that includes everything.

Gorfias said:
I thought I was nuts with about 130. Wait, I am nuts. You must be down right insane! 600 games?!?!?!? That would fill up a server farm.

I guess I just have to ensure I have downloaded somewhere my best/unfinished. (I actually have 3 home gaming class PCs. Could always put some on one system, others on another.)
Yeah, I abandoned physical media years ago, now I only get them if there is collector's edition I want, last one was Skyrim which activated on Steam anyway. If you are concerned about it, buy an external drive, copy all your license keys and you will be fine. Steam has the option to backup all your game files and you can just load them onto external drives. Come Black Friday or Boxing day Best Buy and other electronics stores sell them cheap. You will be playing old games long after Steam is gone, don't think you really need to worry about that either though.
 

FrozenLaughs

New member
Sep 9, 2013
321
0
0
Never viewed it as a bad thing. Games go on sale when either:
Market is so saturated with a popular product you have to put it on sale to push more sales

Or

Game is so poorly received you have to put it on sale to move product.

Both are examples of "anything is better than nothing". If 100 people will buy it at $60, you can bet 300 will buy it at $30, and 1000 will buy it at $15. In the end they still make more money than if they had done nothing.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
The same flawed logic that says sales hurt....sales. A good chunk of games Ive bought on sale I would never have bought otherwise. People spending money means money is being made. Its when no one is spending that the issues arise.
 

KarmaTheAlligator

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,472
0
0
Naeras said:
KarmaTheAlligator said:
Twenty Ninjas said:
Gorfias said:
I'm mostly worried about Steam going out of business.
So I'm the only one here who finds this completely ridiculous?

There is no possible way Valve can go out of business in the foreseeable future. They're an industry giant that is popular and has little competition in what it does.
Nope, I agree with you. The fact that they have so many sales means they're doing well, since they can afford to drop the prices so often.
Correction: they're not holding sales to be nice [http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/07/16/steam-deals-dont-cannibalise-sales-says-valves-director-of-business-management/], they're holding sales because it earns them ridiculous amounts of money [http://www.shacknews.com/article/57308/valve-left-4-dead-half] =p

And, no, they won't go bankrupt anytime soon.
I never said they held sales to be nice, I just said they can afford it: i.e. they're not going to go out of business any time soon. And it also is very profitable for them, yes.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,125
1,883
118
Country
USA
Vigormortis said:
While they won't be able to provide the ability to download the titles indefinitely, should Steam close down, they can provide that ability for some period of time after. ...There is also Big Picture mode, should you prefer a more "console-like" UI. And, you can adjust which windows are prioritized by selecting your favorite "tab" in the options menu.
Good to know this stuff! Thanks! I'll play with the back up utility some more too. Though I was over-writing stuff before. I'd want to be able to remove something from the PC, have it backed up, and add to that back up without over-writing as I get new games. Can I restore only to the machine I backed up?

Zachary Amaranth said:
I have all my games installed to an internal 2 TB HDD added after I created my computer. I'm not sure what the problem would be.
That may be a way easier fix if the above works fine. I think 3TB externals are out now.

You can't imagine paying full price for a game. Unless you can. Which you have. Or will...Is GTA V even announced yet for PC?
GTA, I got it for the PS3. I haven't heard about a PC version. My boy has a gaming class PC I built for him in his room, access to my game accounts, but insists on only playing PS3 and he (18) really wanted GTA5 so I got it for him. It is hard to write what PS3 game I've paid full price for since then. (PC: Bioshock Infinite... PS3? Before GTA5, might have been Black Ops 2).

I love the PS3 as well, but it can't keep up with my PC in terms of graphics and game sales. And ease of use (no disc swapping). My office chair is not as comfy as sitting on a recliner in my family room. PS3 has that on the PC.

PS3 sales can be nuts too, just not as crazy as Steam and Humble Bundle or occastional Gamestop download (which shows up on Steam). In buy 2 get 1 sales at Gamestop, I'm picking up some pretty good stuff, often 3 games for $10 total (Just picked up 2 Red Faction games. They're new to me, so, I don't care the games came out some time ago).

Yet, 2 days till PS4. As I wrote earlier, I am nuts. I'll likely get it soon and be paying $60 for at least a few titles to make use of it. Because PS3 games are going to keep getting cheaper for a while, I'll likely be doing a lot of buying in that area as well.

RhombusHatesYou said:
If you think games are being sold too cheaply move to New Zealand. That'll cure it right fast.
How is your internet there? Do you get the same prices as the US on Downloads? Are you able to download there?

OlasDAlmighty said:
This thread a joke?
Nope. As I've written above, I buy games from a number of places but they show up in Steam. If Steam goes out of business, inspite of its own sales, that could be trouble. Many Gamestop and humblebundle downloads are from there. Steam goes, those downloads go too.

Do you think they charge so little out of charity?
Oddly, www.humblebundle.com is at least in part, for charity! I do think Steam gets a taste, however small though. I doubt they set the pricing though. I've paid as little as 20 cents for some stuff. That's a big part of what has me worried about the viability of the game industry in general and Steam in particular. Is there too much content, getting cheaper all the time. Will it crowd out new content?

In the long run though, this thread has convinced me that:

I better get a bigger drive (either internal, external or both);
Download and back up ASAP;
I should be able to edit my list to see only what I want to see and unhide as needed;
Steam is doing well. Don't worry so much;
As many people are as crazy as me, while I keep buying up bargains, I do think there's always going to be a title or two I can't stop myself from buying new. Others in my shoes won't resist either.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Gorfias said:
PS3 sales can be nuts too, just not as crazy as Steam and Humble Bundle or occastional Gamestop download (which shows up on Steam). In buy 2 get 1 sales at Gamestop, I'm picking up some pretty good stuff, often 3 games for $10 total (Just picked up 2 Red Faction games. They're new to me, so, I don't care the games came out some time ago).
Several of the recent Sony sales were in line with the Steam prices.

Again I point to the rather deceptive marketing of Steam as one of the big reasons people still seem to think it's this super deal.

Yet, 2 days till PS4. As I wrote earlier, I am nuts. I'll likely get it soon and be paying $60 for at least a few titles to make use of it. Because PS3 games are going to keep getting cheaper for a while, I'll likely be doing a lot of buying in that area as well.
To bring this back around to the topic, stores are expecting the biggest console launches ever to hit this month. That's part of the thing. Even if you're going to go for the cheapy PS3 games, the PS4 is going to sell like hotcakes. So's the Xbone. and games. Even PC games.

Do you get the same prices as the US on Downloads? Are you able to download there?
Steam charges them on par with the physical copies, which are overpriced as fuck. The main reason for this is that Steam doesn't have to be a competitive service.

Nope. As I've written above, I buy games from a number of places but they show up in Steam. If Steam goes out of business, inspite of its own sales, that could be trouble. Many Gamestop and humblebundle downloads are from there. Steam goes, those downloads go too.
There's no legit reason to suspect Steam will go down. Also, Humbe Bundle mostly offers DRM-free versions. Some do require Steam (or Origin) but most do not.

Oddly, www.humblebundle.com is at least in part, for charity!
Yes, but Steam doesn't run Humble Bundle. Steam gets good PR out of it, which means they probably take very little, but it's still PR.

Is there too much content, getting cheaper all the time. Will it crowd out new content?
I don't know, was there five years ago? Ten years ago? I mean, there's been a ton of content for a long time. And if you want older games you can get them with pocket change. Why isn't the industry dead yet?

People want new stuff. They want shinier graphics and new maps and all that stuff.

and, I mean, people will always want older stuff, too. There's a reason backwards compatibility is an issue, why remakes and ports are desired/demanded, etc. It's not going to harm the current gen any more than sales are. The things that harm new games are numerous, but these are not an issue.

Keep in mind Saddam Hu...I mean, Gabe Newell claims exponential growth every year. Since he's not accountable to anyone, I suppose he could be lying (The Americans have NOT taken Baghdad!), but it seems odd they'd try and expand more if they weren't at least doing well. Steam Machines are a risky venture, something you would expect a solvent company to do. Not something you would expect someone who is being ruined by their own sales undercutting their profits to do.

Download and back up ASAP;
Steam is doing well. Don't worry so much;
Those seem at odds with one another.

As many people are as crazy as me, while I keep buying up bargains, I do think there's always going to be a title or two I can't stop myself from buying new. Others in my shoes won't resist either.
Which is part of their model. You buy up dozens fo games, many of which you may never play. Even my more moderate purchase habits leave me a couple of games behind my list most of the time, though honestly, I prefer to have a couple more games than I've played as it gives me something to move to.
 

Someone Depressing

New member
Jan 16, 2011
2,417
0
0
If corporations, develops or publishers aren't able to take care of themselves, then really, they shouldn't be in the industry.

I wouldn't worry; it anything, it'll root out develops who can't handle their money against the ones who can.
 

Pink Gregory

New member
Jul 30, 2008
2,296
0
0
http://hitboxteam.com/dustforce-sales-figures

This here might be of interest to this thread.

EDIT: to do with the reinvigoration and sales spikes that deep-discount sales bring to games.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,125
1,883
118
Country
USA
Zachary Amaranth said:
Download and back up ASAP;
Steam is doing well. Don't worry so much;
Those seem at odds with one another.
"Trust but verify". Steam is likely fine, but I shouldn't be in idiot: ensure I have backups just in case.


As many people are as crazy as me, while I keep buying up bargains, I do think there's always going to be a title or two I can't stop myself from buying new. Others in my shoes won't resist either.
Which is part of their model. You buy up dozens of games, many of which you may never play. Even my more moderate purchase habits leave me a couple of games behind my list most of the time, though honestly, I prefer to have a couple more games than I've played as it gives me something to move to.[/quote]

I like variety too. I have about 15 pinball games. Fun to jump on one for a bit. Then jump back into an FPS. Then play some Skyrim. Then Limbo.

What isn't finished far out numbers what I have finished.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
If developers and publishers really were losing money on Steam due to sales (ie, being too inexpensive), you can bet nobody would distribute through Steam.
Which is to say nothing of Valve themselves, who are doing just fine.

Pink Gregory said:
http://hitboxteam.com/dustforce-sales-figures

This here might be of interest to this thread.
That actually is worth reading.
You really should have elaborated on it yourself though; bring some of the points to the fore.

Like the major boosts to their revenue due to sales after launch.
(which completely flies in the face of sales devaluing software)
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
Gorfias said:
Good to know this stuff! Thanks! I'll play with the back up utility some more too. Though I was over-writing stuff before. I'd want to be able to remove something from the PC, have it backed up, and add to that back up without over-writing as I get new games. Can I restore only to the machine I backed up?
You don't create a single backup of your Steam account. The backup utility built into Steam makes individual backups for each game. It essentially creates a disc image of the game files from which you can reinstall.[footnote]You may, however, have to create your own backups of settings and saved game files. But a simple copy/paste job of the requisite files is all you need.[/footnote]

Once you have the backup, you can store it wherever you want. And, when you're ready to install it in the future, you can install it to any computer. Provided you can either login to your account online or the computer in question has your account credentials stored locally.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
Strelok said:
Actually that is incorrect, Microsoft apparently loses billions due to the entertainment division made up for by Android patent royalties apparently.

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-earns-2-billion-per-year-from-android-patent-royalties-2013-11

In fact one of the investors that wants to dump XBox and Microsoft games was just given a seat on the board.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/31/microsoft_valueact_ballmer/

The new CEO candidate Stephen Elop is rumored to not exactly be an XBox fan as well.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/8/5080192/microsoft-ceo-candidate-stephen-elop-bing-xbox-rumors
I was actually already aware of much of that. However, I take issue with the first article you linked.

A lot of the assertions made by Mr. Sherlund include a few too many instances of "probably".

Not that I'm of a mind that those assertions are impossibly false, I'd just prefer more solid evidence than a 3rd party analyst saying, "probably".

[sub]As a side note, it really doesn't surprise me that the Android division is making them the most money.[/sub]
 

Rariow

New member
Nov 1, 2011
342
0
0
I'm pretty sure Valve's swimming in cash right about now. These sales just mean more people buy the game, generating income that never would have been generated otherwise. These guys are huge corporations, they know what they're doing, and if Valve was leaking money because of Steam sales, they'd cut them out in an instant. As much as I like Valve, they're not putting on these crazy sales out of their kindness of their heart like most people seem to believe, they're doing it because it gives them Scrooge McDuck levels of money.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,125
1,883
118
Country
USA
Vigormortis said:
Gorfias said:
Good to know this stuff! Thanks! I'll play with the back up utility some more too. Though I was over-writing stuff before. I'd want to be able to remove something from the PC, have it backed up, and add to that back up without over-writing as I get new games. Can I restore only to the machine I backed up?
You don't create a single backup of your Steam account. The backup utility built into Steam makes individual backups for each game. It essentially creates a disc image of the game files from which you can reinstall.[footnote]You may, however, have to create your own backups of settings and saved game files. But a simple copy/paste job of the requisite files is all you need.[/footnote]

Once you have the backup, you can store it wherever you want. And, when you're ready to install it in the future, you can install it to any computer. Provided you can either login to your account online or the computer in question has your account credentials stored locally.
Awesome! I can probably burn a back up of each game to DVD (or blank bluray) if necessary, per game! Worth it!