Inception: A First Impressions

Recommended Videos

Chefodeath

New member
Dec 31, 2009
759
0
0
Well, I just got back from watching Inception, and I figure the best way for me to put together my thoughts on it is to write a review, so here it is. Note that this is my first impressions; for a film like this, you really need to see it a few times to write anything fully comprehensive.

Inception is a hard movie to watch. Its an experience that leaves you mentally tired like you just read a Platonic dialogue, in the original Greek no less! Don't go expecting something easy to unwind with. Pay hard attention though, and you will find it a very rich experience, something that starts the mind spinning ideas like a top.

The philosophy and inherit plot are brilliant; Without leaving any spoilers, I will say the ending was of such sublime genius, that I left that theater with my jaw gaping all the way until I got in my car. The characters were supurb, adding that oh so neccesary human element to deep concepts such as these, and I have no complaints for actor portrayels.

Inception wasn't a perfect film though, its flaws made glaringly obvious in relation to its shinier attributes. Perhaps when I see it again and pick up a few of the things I missed the first time, I'll be a bit more forgiving, but not now.

The concepts explored by Inception are by no means new (Look up a distinguished old frenchman by the name of Descartes) and its sole original merrit rests in its portrayel of these elements. Inception is effectively a philosophy teacher, a philosophy teacher who's lessons consist of explosions and gunfire, but a teacher none the less. For me, I most critically judged it on how well it presented its core material.

Inception understands it is a hard film, knows it has limited appeal to the mainstream, and so consequently decides to embrace its veneer of mystery. The movie should have been trying its very hardest to clarify its content without dumbing it down, while I feel that sometimes it was purposefully trying to obscure itself with rushed scenes and murkey dialogue. There is poetry, and there is purposefully writing nonsense just to draw people with a search for deeper meaning (Yes there is a difference!)

My second immersion-shattering problem was with the dream physics. This movie throws a lot of crazy concepts at you, and they were pretty hit and miss for me. Half the stuff had me going "Awesome!" and the other half "Bullshit!" Inception asks you to give it a lot of creative leeway, and it earns the most of that, but it really did push the boundries at some points.

And this is a small nitpick, more to do with personal tastes then anything, but a little more humour would have gone a long way.

Anyway, that's my first impressions. I'm planning on seeing it a second time, which I rarely do for movies if that's any indication. Good film, you really need to check it out for yourselves though.
 

markstit

New member
Mar 9, 2009
88
0
0
I was thinking about seeing this film in theater but it seems
like a movie that requires more consecrations then i would be
able to give it at a cinema. I will wait for it to come out on
DVD or REDBOX and watch it a few times in a row ;)

Nice review Chefodeath!
 

gjendemsjo

New member
May 11, 2010
281
0
0
A short, good review. While I personally see it as a masterpiece, I too agree that some more humor would have made it even better without ruining the seriousness of it all.
 

Subzerowings

New member
May 1, 2009
989
0
0
I can't really say that I agree (by the way, I'd suggest you do alot of grammar checks before you post).
Inception was quite easy to watch, I don't get the fact that people need to see it another time to understand it.
Of course, I can't discuss it here because that would include spoilers, but I'll try to sum it up in one centence.
The wife was right, story over.
Pardon me for my apparent snootiness, but even though this is probably the best movie this year, it's still nothing special compared to other movies.
It's a good movie, great even, but don't hype yourself too much.
I'm just glad that this movie had some good action, unlike of most action movies.
No shacky cam and overall great cinematography, that's the least that you can ask for in a good movie.
 

Deofuta

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,099
0
0
I don't think it was a matter of being hard to watch, there is just simply a LOT to look out for. I like that, lets me be able to see the movie again and again, always finding something new to pick my mind at.

Overall, while I don't agree with your review, thanks for posting your opinion! :)
 

Bourne

New member
May 8, 2010
155
0
0
Are you people crazy?

First off: The humor. It felt completely out of place and hindered the drama and seriousness inherent in the story. I have noticed this with Nolan's work as of late... A serious score, serious dialogue, serious acting, serious set pieces, serious themes, and stupid little jokes that feel forced and contrived.

Secondly: The "difficulty" of the story. This movie is not confusing, not in the least; I think most people have become so used to mindless action and drama films that hold the viewers' hands throughout (even Inception did this to a certain degree), so that having multiple layers gives those with what I affectionately refer to as "AADD" (acquired attention deficit disorder) the appearance of a hard-to-follow movie, which this was not.

As for the ending...

I firmly believe he was back in reality; the fact that Nolan did not show the totem topple was a "screw you" to the audience and their lack of attention span and tolerance for an intelligent movie, and also as a "figure it out" device. People who argue that he is still dreaming are simply over analyzing the movie, or trying to show some form of intelligent thought due to some superiority complex.