Graustein post=18.73187.786841 said:
I say we stubbornly use the word literally to mean literally. Might not save the word, but I'm not going down without a fight.
...Damn. Wiktionary notes the widespread usage of Literally as an intensifier. It's a losing battle, this one.
It's a losing battle BECAUSE of things like Wiktionary, where any idiot can be an instant expert. Instead of buying dictionaries, we look for free on-line references which frequently are worth what we pay for them.
I worked with a man who thought "redundant" meant "stupid", because he saw on a Britcom a man say he had "been made redundant" and for some unknown reason decided it meant "stupid".
I worked with a guy who said he thought his carburetor wasn't working and he wanted me to look at it. So I looked at his carburetor. And he says "No, this thing, the carburetor, that keeps the battery charged." ME: "That's the alternator." HIM: "Well, I call it a carburetor." ME (in loud voice): "You can't call it a fucking carburetor, there's already something called a carburetor a foot from it!"
Then there are the expressions - "It's a doggy-dog world." "It's six of one and half of another." "We can't count on our chickens until they roost." "You can't lead a horse to water." Our old folksy truisms are being made into mush. Grrr. These are the people whom Scott Adams refers to as "obliviots".
The crowning idiocy is Al Gore, who in the course of defending a multi-lingual society during one debate gave a stirring little speech about how our (the USA's) strength is in our many diverse cultures, saying "It's in our motto, 'E Pluribus unum' - out of one, many." Here's a man who served as vice president, and was running for president, getting our national motto ass-backward.