This guy in particular knows what he's talking about. The Avernum series has a true spirit to its writing that's absent in most other games. The games are ugly, complex, and not user-friendly, and yet they have this appeal to them that big-budget games just don't have. Considering they're completely made by this one man, it's just plain astounding.
I do agree that there are certain exceptions to the statement that "all piracy is bad". But I also think that people tend to always think that they fall under these exceptions, even when it is clearly not the case.
Far too many people use the "games cost too much" argument, which is so flawed I won't entertain it further here. Others say that they will always end up buying every pirated game they "like", which is equally problematic (If you played through a bad game, you still effectively stole an experience that was meant to be paid for. I've been to restaurants I didn't particularly care for, but I would never finish my entire meal and then refuse to pay for it, regardless of how little I like it.).
What I'm trying to say (and semi-failing, since I'm very tired right now) is that many pirates will always put themselves in the "exception" category. "No," they say, "I'm going to be the one who sticks it to the man. No, I'm only going to support the development of good games."
The rest of the world, myself included, turns to them and replies, "No, you're a thief."
EDIT: This has always been an interesting debate to me.
Nova5 said:
Android2137 said:
Hmm... If you pirate a game that's so old, it's hard to find it and a working console it plays on anymore, is it still bad? Because I am so guilty of that.
You know, I don't see how this could be 'wrong' if they're not offering a modern digital distribution of it (like the PSX games on the PSN). I've seen a lot of unreasonable (read: "fanatical") anti-piracy folks claim downloading old ROMs of discontinued games from discontinued systems is hurting developers, but I don't see how it can help them if you're just paying some eBay seller $80 that the devs won't see anyway.
It's a very morally ambiguous question, I think. Personally, I think it's wrong, but I can certainly see the other side.
Basically, think of it this way. Blizzard developed a game called
The Lost Vikings for SNES (and other platforms) years and years ago; obviously, it's out of print. Now, some guy on eBay just got fired from his job and is really hurting just to get by. He puts his Lost Vikings cartridge on eBay for $80.
Now, pretend that you really want this game. Many people would hop on an emulator without a second thought. After all, Blizzard's got plenty of money
and the game is out of print, so they wouldn't see a dime regardless. But is that really fair to the guy who wants to sell his cartridge? Now you're depriving him of a sale of his own property.
I think that far too many people only consider the retail industry, when the resale industry is equally important to our economy. eBay's resounding success is a testament to that significance. My personal belief is that we shouldn't ignore either one. Do you hate the fact that GameStop sells their used games at high prices? Then find one on eBay for cheaper and let capitalism and the free market do their thing. Just contribute to the economy. Stealing rarely,
rarely ever has a reasonable justification.