If an infinite amount of universes exists, then surely there's an infinite amount of "I" who've traveled to an infinite amount of universes, changing the outcome of an infinite amount of events. In fact, an infinite amount of "I" have already changed all events that happened within this very universe an infinite number of times (because there's an infinite amount of "I" who possesses the ability to both travel through different universes and time), and looking at the current state of the world I'd like to ask myself: Is that the best you can do?!
If this is the best an infite amount of "I" can accomplish, then surely, me contributing would be pointless.
Here is my new infinite universe theory: There's an infinite amount of them, yet they're all 100% (right down to the atomic level and below) identical. Through the chaos of an infinite amount of time travelers changing all the events, what emerges is a sort of equilibrium state that cannot be changed and thus what we experience is the truly neutral (deterministic?) outcome of events.
Of course, all this hinge on whether or not traveling between universes and through time is an actual posibility in any of the universes. But if you start to impose restrictions on what can and cannot happen, can you truly call it infinite (not in numbers, but in the original sense of infinite outcomes) any more?
Now I'm confused. Don't blame me for going off-topic, it was bound to happen because of the equilibrium state!
fact: This post contains nearly an infinite amount of the word "infinite".