Inglorious Bastards

[Jackel86]

F***ING AWESOME! Go see it.

Don't really have much else to say on the subject.

Also, of the people who have seen it already, do you agree?

Edit: Yes, I know I spelled it wrong. My brain spell-checked it for me on accident.

 

[Sir Ollie]

Ahh good, I want to see this film so is Tarantino back on form now? because his last few movies sucked.

 

[WrongSprite]

I'm glad you've shared your everlasting wisdom with the community.

Now. What am I discussing?

 

[quiet_samurai]

I'm so glad I was fortunate enough to read that truly well-thought-out post.

I definitely feel smarter......

 

[FallenRainbows]

I was expecting a rant. I am not amused.

 

[Jackel86]

Back on form indeed. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's his best, but definitely up to snuff. All his awkward humor and violence is back in style.

 

[Federalist92]

Pulp fiction will always be my favourite but this looks epic.
I heard there wasnt enough fighting though.
Is that true?

 

[[Cold-Shoulder]]

I was expecting a rant. I am not amused.

Neither am I. May I ask what are we suppose to talk about on this thread?

 

[Beartrucci]

I heard that there was too much talking and barely any action. Could you give me your opinion on that please?

 

[Jackel86]

What the hell do you want? A full review? I'm tired. I just wanted to let anyone who was worried about Tarantino's recent track record that it's worth the time and money. You want a full review, wait for MovieBob. I'm sure he'll hate it and tell you how much popular stuff sucks.

 

[Sir Ollie]

Back on form indeed. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's his best, but definitely up to snuff. All his awkward humor and violence is back in style.

Excellent, I'm watching it tonight so I'm hoping for a good film!

 

[I Am Pigeon]

Well I was planning to see it this sunday, is that good enough?

But you really should put a little more into the first post.
Instead of just "F***ING AWESOME! Go see it," maybe you can elaborate on why we should see it.

 

[FallenRainbows]

I was expecting a rant. I am not amused.

Neither am I. May I ask what are we suppose to talk about on this thread?

I DECLARE THIS THREAD IN THE NAME OF PANDAS!

 

[Jackel86]

I heard that there was too much talking and barely any action. Could you give me your opinion on that please?

There was a lot of talking, but I wouldn't say "too much." Tarantino's dialogue is his best work. There is a lot less action than I expected though, yes.

 

[curlycrouton]

What the hell do you want? A full review?

Yes.

Or at least some structured thought.

Also, it's spelt incorrectly (on purpose), as Inglourious Basterds.

 

[Jackel86]

Well I was planning to see it this sunday, is that good enough?

But you really should put a little more into the first post.
Instead of just "F***ING AWESOME! Go see it," maybe you can elaborate on why we should see it.

If you like Tarantino's other stuff, you'll like it. It's got the same feel as his other works. I'm not sure why his movies are so good, they just are.

Also, it doesn't really matter when you see it, so long as you do. I've just always been a big fan, so I didn't want to wait.

 

[The Infamous Scamola]

I heard that there was too much talking and barely any action. Could you give me your opinion on that please?

Are you familiar with any Tarantino films?

Also, glad to hear it. And BTW it's spelled Basterds.

 

[Gingerman]

I had the chance to go see this but went to see The proposal instead, moral of the story is girlfriends are evil.

 

[Beartrucci]

I heard that there was too much talking and barely any action. Could you give me your opinion on that please?

Are you familiar with any Tarantino films?

Also, glad to hear it. And BTW it's spelled Basterds.

Well I only finished watching Kill Bill volume 1 & 2 yesterday so I wouldn't say I'm familiar with his work.

 

[The Infamous Scamola]

Well I only finished watching Kill Bill volume 1 & 2 yesterday so I wouldn't say I'm familiar with his work.

Dialogue is pretty much is pretty much the thing Tarantino is famous for, and it pretty much takes the front seat in all of his works.