You're describing it as if the stimulus packages are over-growing the economy. What do you mean by 'blow up'?Lyx said:Well, i don't subscribe to the popular doctrine of artificially blowing up the economy. If an economy cannot sustain itself, then what it needs is not more cash to burn, but instead fixing of its defects.
Also consider this: Even with the government stepping in to keep the economy afloat, people are suffering, a lot. Think how bad it would've been if the government hadn't stepped in!
Improbable. Don't worry. The implication of the phrase 'not impossible' is an obvious one. What I don't know is what you are claiming is unlikely. What do you think is unlikely exactly?I in my past reply wrote "not impossible.........." - what i didn't speak out was "just very unprobable".
Prove that governments rarely make use of efficiency savings.If you look at the recent history of the USA, it is unambigiously clear, that it is very motivated to blow up the economy, while not very motivated and disciplined at running a real budget surplus, by reducing gov spending (which does not in all cases need to involve axing of features - there is such a thing as efficiency of gov services, and govs rarely make use of that), and increasing taxation. The USA shows no signs at all of making massive changes to the spend/tax balance. In fact, spending is quickly INCREASING, not decreasing.
Justify a budget surplus. Why is a budget surplus a good thing? Why is a deficit a bad thing?
What is bad about spending currently increasing?
Printing money is called quantitative easing. Quantitative easing works. Whether you object to it morally or not, the fact of the matter is that it props up aggregate demand, reduces the value of fixed-rate debts, and increases exports while decreasing imports. These are all to an extent good things.Or in short: The US' plan to fix their budget problem, is the idea that if the budget is just negative enough, it will someway become positive (via an endless series of "stimulus" packages, which is just a nice sounding description for "printing and giving away free money").
A stimulus package is designed to increase (Stimulate) Aggregate Demand. AD is composed of:
Consumption-- People buying stuff
Investment-- Firms buying stuff
Government Spending-- Government buying stuff
Exports-Imports-- Foreigners buying your stuff-You buying foreign stuff
A stimulus package can involve many measures including, but not limited to, quantitative easing- a monetary measure. The bailing out (Purchasing) of the banks is one other example of a stimulus measure, designed to prop up investment. This allowed the banks to operate at regular levels even during the time of crisis, which in turn allowed firms to borrow to buy more stuff, and people to borrow to buy more stuff. A stimulus package also includes fiscal measures, such as raising or lowering certain taxes, and increasing or decreasing certain government expenditures.
So you see how a 'Stimulus Package' is not just a nice sounding description for 'Printing Money'.