Sounds like you hate physicists more than mathematicians. Why do you feel this way about people trying to create a model of the universe with the best tools they have yet invented for doing so?Alandoril said:I hate mathematicians. Granted numbers have their essential uses, but the idea that you can sum up the origin of the universe with a stream of numbers that mankind invented (they're NOT universal constants, merely arbitrary frames of reference) is frankly arrogant and absurd.
Many times throughout history our current mathematical tools have proved to be inadequate; they have been replaced by newly invented branches of maths more suited to the task. It may be true that to model the universe at the next level of complexity we shall require a system very different from the one we use now, but that does not make their endeavour less worthy, or mean that mathematics is obsolete.
There is an extremely powerful correlation between what we observe, and the mathematical models built to describe them. Do not dismiss Science so quickly.
As to the question, I believe it is futile to argue over which is more vital to society.
Mathematics is fundamental to our understanding of the world, not just in the theoretical sense that Alandoril disparages, as it also underpins our system of logic. to be able to think mathematically is necessary for any kind of society worthy of the name.
History, if we take it as everything that is remembered of the past, represents the sum of human knowledge. All art, science and philosophy falls under this. Even starting with the concept of modern maths, having no "history would leave us blind, on unfamiliar ground.
It is like arguing whether water or air is most important.