pretty much what this guy has saidAssassin Xaero said:Umm... I fail to see how hiding around a corner and waiting for someone to appear to blast them with an M60 is a "strategy" . And to that last remark, are you trolling or have you not played a Call of Duty game in the past 3-4 years?ShakesZX said:Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not a good strategy. It is annoying and I always hunt down campers mercilessly, but it is a sound strategy. It is an acquired skill to camp correctly, just as it is an acquired skill to run and gun correctly. Also, what does sacrificing yourself for your beliefs have to do with killing and moving?Assassin Xaero said:For sniping, sometimes. Anyone who has said "camping is a legitimate strategy" is a camper. Another little fun fact, the majority of people who hate martyrdom are also campers because they don't understand the concept of killing someone then MOVING (well, at least the majority of the ones I've run into).
To answer your first question:Assassin Xaero said:Umm... I fail to see how hiding around a corner and waiting for someone to appear to blast them with an M60 is a "strategy" . And to that last remark, are you trolling or have you not played a Call of Duty game in the past 3-4 years?ShakesZX said:Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not a good strategy. **snip** Also, what does sacrificing yourself for your beliefs have to do with killing and moving?Assassin Xaero said:For sniping, sometimes. Anyone who has said "camping is a legitimate strategy" is a camper. Another little fun fact, the majority of people who hate martyrdom are also campers because they don't understand the concept of killing someone then MOVING (well, at least the majority of the ones I've run into).
I normally get killed by campers because:Serenegoose said:"You're not moving or performing any sort of evasive maneouvres and that means you keep killing me!" Uh... what? Sorry, if some guy keeps picking you off because you keep coming round the same route, and despite the fact he's not moving you can't put a bullet in him, that's not him being good, that's you being awful.
There's unbalanced ways to camp and unbalanced ways to counter campers. MW2 compared to MW1 is broken enough to actually be more balanced when countering fags.GamesB2 said:Camping's a legitimate strategy. It's just games like Call of Duty unbalance it and make it harder to kill them.
For example: Sniper in slot one, shotgun in slot two.
Please, next time, use paragraphs.flaming_ninja said:Real life isn't relevant, realism has always been attempted to be attached to this genre but I don't think it should be and if it were it would have to go all out, no game to date have I ever seen with realistic gun ballistics, there isn't a part in Call of Duty were you're adjusting the zero range of your sights and noting the ballistic curve because that would break gameplay and bore non-fanatics although it is something I would like to see if done well. In real life you don't get to respawn, in real life defibrillators don't recover bullet wounds. I understand the immersion which you could get from a realistic shooter but one like that just doesn't exist.Bloodstain said:In real life, you'd die if you didn't camp.
That's why I think it's okay in games as well. I'm a bit of a roleplayer.
Good answer!Decagonopus said:It is NEVER the opposing players fault for camping.
If it's possible in game -- it's legitimate.
If the level caters to campers -- Pick a different level.
If the game is imbalanced in favor of campers -- Play a better FPS.
If the entire other team is camping -- Play a game mode that requires movement.
(The best teams are ones that have a variety of player styles that complement each other.)
Spawn camping IS a bad thing, but it's the games and levels that need to be designed to avoid this. (Random spawning, no campable areas near spawn points, short invincibility upon re-spawning, etc)
If your own team members aren't playing as a team for ANY reason (including camping) then you have every right to tell them to change.