I think the thing that upsets me the most about you is actually not even in your control. With horrendous grammar, poor sentence structure, and of course idiotic statement after idiotic statement there is a problem.Bright_Raven said:how is america not regarded as a religious terrorist nation? religion and state are so merged its absurd, they invade other countries under the guise of "peace keeping" when they obviously just want to controll the contry, destroy the economy and strip it of resorces cheep. why are they not in zimbabwe? yet they went to war in iraq which hat a stable (if authoritorian) government. the people rioting on the streets were payed by CIA agents after Saddam refused to continue supplying america with cheep oil and wanted to rebuild his contry by using the cash gained by oil to fund civic improovements. nobody starved under saddam. how many starve in america?
Afganistan is used by americas government to grow more than 90% of the worlds Opium. the americas government is evil, and they have good PR people so that people can not see that. "Land of the free"? after america enslaves the rest of the world, only your "royal" families will be free. this sounds riddikulus because you have been taught to dismiss the idea of any type of conspirisy, yet you are willig to believe a 1500 year old book about talking shrubbery, magic invisible men and magic zombies...
Under your name, the words "Pulitzer Laureate" appears. All I can say is "I hope not".
Although I suppose I could ask you the question, why has America not taken a drop of oil from Iraq to this very day? Iraq is even considering selling it to other countries first, even though the fact they can do that is because of America. I'm not here to argue foreign policy, just to point out the fact if it was America's goal to strip Iraq of all its resources, why are we allowing them to sell it to other countries and not us first? At the very least why did we just not take it for ourselves and not allow them to sell it?