At the end in most cases, you don't inherently win anything by just changing the character's gender. Giving Link or Chell a different skin and a different voice (Link screams while attacking and Chell sometimes grunts when she gets hurt) while keeping everything else the same, doesn't bring anything new. It just makes the characters more generic (just like the Chosen Undead, the Last Dragonborn, the Lone Wanderer, the Courier, the Hero of Kvatch, etc...)Zenja said:I disagree with this. If the name Link means Link between player and game, then the player should be allowed to choose whether or not it is boob time as it is their "link". Second, the name should be gender neutral. Choosing gender shouldn't change the name Link as per the idea of it being a "link" between player and game. Third, changing gender in no way 'mixes things up'. It is still silent protagonist. Chell isn't a drastically different character than Gordan Freeman. Making Mario a girl and naming him Maria but keeping the gameplay the same doesn't really change anything. Fourth, making Link a girl IS rule 63, I see no reason why Zelda couldn't be made male if Link is made female. Fifth, I will pass on lesbian undertones, not every game needs sex injected into it and I like the innocence of the Zelda franchise.MHR said:The only hiccup in this would be giving the player the option to toggle between sexes inexplicably. If Link is truly a defined character, then they're defined by the world's fate, not directly by the player. So if it's boob time, it's boob time.
There's nothing wrong with Link being Linkle in a new Zelda game. Even as someone generally opposed to over-inclusion just for inclusion's sake or SJW nonsense, I see no problem with this one change just to mix things up. Link has been the same forever. Having Zelda change to a prince at the same time though would reek of rule 63, something we could do without thanks. There's nothing wrong with some lesbian undertones either![]()
It's not about "winning anything"; merely offering an option a subsection of the players want.CaitSeith said:At the end in most cases, you don't inherently win anything by just changing the character's gender. Giving Link or Chell a different skin and a different voice (Link screams while attacking and Chell sometimes grunts when she gets hurt) while keeping everything else the same, doesn't bring anything new. It just makes the characters more generic (just like the Chosen Undead, the Last Dragonborn, the Lone Wanderer, the Courier, the Hero of Kvatch, etc...)
I agree completely with you. However, making Link more generic isn't exactly a large step backwards in character development. Personally, I would rather see a female counterpart (not Zelda) come in and both of them undergo character development as I would like to see the world of Hyrule get personality through character development. However, Nintendo likes the blank slate approach and is very resistant to character development. Which is fine, but if they plan to keep everything rather simplistic I see no reason to not allow the player's 'link' to be more generic in the name of inclusion for girls. The game may not gain anything but little girls actually do gain something.CaitSeith said:At the end in most cases, you don't inherently win anything by just changing the character's gender. Giving Link or Chell a different skin and a different voice (Link screams while attacking and Chell sometimes grunts when she gets hurt) while keeping everything else the same, doesn't bring anything new. It just makes the characters more generic (just like the Chosen Undead, the Last Dragonborn, the Lone Wanderer, the Courier, the Hero of Kvatch, etc...)
Actually, just to nitpick, the original Link, I mean the ORIGINAL original, was a Hylian fighting in service to Hylia the goddess. If he was a Goron, it wouldn't really make much sense in the context of what he represented when he originally fought Demise before he died and Demise was sealed within the sword gifted by the goddess. I don't think that the Gorons necessarily worship Hylia so much as they work with her disciples. They seem to have a kind of ancestral reverence akin to that of the dwarves in Dragon Age, for lack of a better example. It would be like if Zelda was resurrected as a man. Hylia is a goddess in the series and while Link is not a set in stone male so much as a role to be played, Zelda is required by ingame lore to be female, as all the Zeldas in question are all avatars of Hylia, with Link, male or female, being the chosen hero of her preferred race the Hylians.MarsAtlas said:Why can't he be a goron? Not in the Majora's Mask way, but a real goron. The only thing that really makes Link a character is his spirit of courage. That is extremely ambiguous. The only other real defining part of his personality is also relative to the Triforce - he doesn't have the personality of the bearer of the Triforce of Wisdom and he doesn't have the personality of the bearer of the Triforce of Power. Really his entire character is relative to the Triforce and a few specific character traits, none of which are tied to gender, race, appearance, etc.
Gordon receives some measure of characterization, mostly by the way other characters (scientists, guards) talk about him.MHR said:He can't be compared to Gordon Freeman since gordon truly has no reaction to anything, not even falling 3 stories and breaking his leg. The damn robot-lady voice in his suit shooting him full of morphine is more characterized than him.