From what I've seen in others it does seem to have a bit of a dependence issue. However what drug doesn't? On the spectrum I would put it as worse than coffee, but not as bad as tobacco or alcohol.
That's inaccurate. What causes lung cancer is the TAR (acronym for Total Aerosol Residue, nothing to do with the tar used on roads) in the smoke.Ihateregistering1 said:A correction to what a lot of people are putting on here: marijuana is not going to give you lung cancer or emphysema in the same way that tobacco does. Those diseases are largely a result of nicotine, which is present in cigarettes but not (usually) in marijuana joints.
Likewise, someone who is a "smoker" usually smokes close to a pack of cigarettes a day (usually 20 cigarettes). Even the most die-hard pot head doesn't smoke 20 joints a day.
That doesn't mean inhaling smoke is good for you, but it's not just the inhalation of smoke that causes lung cancer and emphysema.
ah, wonderful times. It was still worth experimenting, and unlike other (gutless and/or sensible) countries, USA was willing to do so.Kopikatsu said:Also, they tried banning alcohol. People literally started murdering each other in the streets over it.
SonCamKu said:For medical reasons obviously, does marijuana have any bad long term side effects?