Is Microsoft Considering Non-Gaming Achievements?
- Thread starter John Funk
- Start date
Achievements are pretty pointless anyways. You get them for starting the game, you get them for completing the first level, you get them for doing some mind-numbingly easy task fifty times... if this can help generate even more ridiculous amounts of revenue, then more power to the Micro$oft machine for a great business tactic.
haha, thats pretty cool. Makes the boring parts of a life a smidgen more interesting than they would have otherwise been.
It seems a little redundant to me. With game-achievements, most of those them have to at least be attempted to be earned, like completing the first chapter in a game or something.
With the achievements not in games, like the example of watching 50 movies, it's like they're rewarding you for living your life and just doing something rather than actually "achieving" them.
With the achievements not in games, like the example of watching 50 movies, it's like they're rewarding you for living your life and just doing something rather than actually "achieving" them.
No. Bad idea. Gamerscore should be left to scores you get in the GAME.
Speaking of which.
Speaking of which.
Aw, damn.jthm said:
I honestly don't care. I only like the fact that I can see that bubble of happiness for something I did in game. If I got something for turning the console on or connecting to xbox live I would ignore them and just continue on to my game where I can get "real" achievements.
