They are allowed to, they should be allowed to, school is not meant for Facebook, you probably have plenty of time at home for that, I do not wish to be a killjoy but you have to realize that there is a time and a place for everything.
Not in the least bit. In my time teaching, I've given a few dozen stern warnings, and when I've ran into egregious cases, I've confiscated a few phones. A school staff member can confiscate a phone, or similar objects, if their usage or possession is banned by school rules.Starke said:The Phone confiscation thing? That they can't do. I'm pretty sure that's still petty theft. Get a decently expensive smartphone locked up in the teacher's drawer, and file a police report and see what shakes out, if you're really curious.
That depends on the rules of the school. If you signed some sort of form in which you agree to comply to their rules, and those rules forbid electronic devices on the school grounds, then it's your own damn fault if you take your phone to school and they confiscate it.Starke said:The Phone confiscation thing? That they can't do. I'm pretty sure that's still petty theft. Get a decently expensive smartphone locked up in the teacher's drawer, and file a police report and see what shakes out, if you're really curious. But, the internet connection thing? Yeah, that's certainly legal.Heartcafe said:Note: I know someone is going to pop the question: well, why don't they use their own mobile phones? Our classes are quite small so hiding isn't easy and our teachers aren't push overs. If anyone is caught with a mobile phone out, they loose it for a week in the teacher's drawers and nobody wants to loose their phone.
Oak's words echoed... "Ash! There is a time and place for everything! But not now!"Adrian Neyland said:They are allowed to, they should be allowed to, school is not meant for Facebook, you probably have plenty of time at home for that, I do not wish to be a killjoy but you have to realize that there is a time and a place for everything.
Why shouldn't they? It is a place of education. The computers should be used for work and work purposes only. It's also the school's WiFi system that the tax payers are paying for, Why shouldn't people have to say "This is my laptop and what is done on it is done by me while on this network"Chibz said:They ARE allowed to, it's just that they SHOULDN'T do it.
Besides, there are less intrusive way to stop facebook/etc use.
Yeah, that is a fair point. If the parents signed a waver allowing the seizure then it's fine. If there isn't such a waver, then... less so.Zeriu said:That depends on the rules of the school. If you signed some sort of form in which you agree to comply to their rules, and those rules forbid electronic devices on the school grounds, then it's your own damn fault if you take your phone to school and they confiscate it.Starke said:The Phone confiscation thing? That they can't do. I'm pretty sure that's still petty theft. Get a decently expensive smartphone locked up in the teacher's drawer, and file a police report and see what shakes out, if you're really curious. But, the internet connection thing? Yeah, that's certainly legal.Heartcafe said:Note: I know someone is going to pop the question: well, why don't they use their own mobile phones? Our classes are quite small so hiding isn't easy and our teachers aren't push overs. If anyone is caught with a mobile phone out, they loose it for a week in the teacher's drawers and nobody wants to loose their phone.
I'm guessing you're operating under such a waver.Fleischer said:Not in the least bit. In my time teaching, I've given a few dozen stern warnings, and when I've ran into egregious cases, I've confiscated a few phones. A school staff member can confiscate a phone, or similar objects, if their usage or possession is banned by school rules.
Actually, according to the United States Supreme Court, school teachers do indeed act as in loco parentis [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis]. Seeing as how they set the laws of the US, if the OP is in the US, the teachers are paid to act as Big Brother, or more accurately, Big Mother. And Mother has every right to monitor your behavior. The Supreme Court has held that people under the age of 18 do not have the same rights as those over, including certain aspects of free speech and privacy (if you are really interested, Tinker v De Moines [http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/tinker.html] discusses exactly what free speech rights students have, and New Jersey v T.L.O. [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0469_0325_ZS.html] goes into detail about what rights to privacy students can expect) The court has pretty much stated that if conduct by a student disrupts the normal classwork of the institution, then that conduct is not protected by the constitution. It really depends on whether or not the OP is in the US. I am not familiar with the laws of other countries regarding this.FalloutJack said:Use of the internet cannot be denied since it's necessary for work purposes. Invasion of your effing laptop cannot be allowed because it's your laptop. Answer: The school has to cave in because they must further education and the completion of work. They are not paid to act as Big Brother. No, they really aren't.Aris Khandr said:And their internet connection. Your point doesn't really hold up.FalloutJack said:No, because this isn't even a case of Sony and the PS3. It's YOUR fucking laptop.
Depending on how the network is set up, that probably wouldn't help at all. Any unregistered wireless device would get routed to a choke page telling you to register the device. So unless you could set it to spoof faculty access...Voodoomancer said:One solution might be to get a USB wireless dongle. Lets you connect to the internet without the school wireless OR a phone, and if anyone asks you can say it's a USB memory stick.
But internet access is provided through the school computers. The school's covered on this: they aren't obliged to allow any machine to connect to their internet and are fully within their rights to register and monitor any user connected to their network. At my school we had to sign a code of conduct for the use of the computers stating what we were and were not allowed to do and on top of that there was a stringent filter; it's their network, it's their rules. At uni they even made us use one of three anti-viruses before we were allowed to connect, and even though I was using Comodo (tested to be more secure than any of the solutions they required) I wasn't allowed access until I'd installed AVG as well. Their network, their rules.FalloutJack said:Use of the internet cannot be denied since it's necessary for work purposes. Invasion of your effing laptop cannot be allowed because it's your laptop. Answer: The school has to cave in because they must further education and the completion of work. They are not paid to act as Big Brother. No, they really aren't.Aris Khandr said:And their internet connection. Your point doesn't really hold up.FalloutJack said:No, because this isn't even a case of Sony and the PS3. It's YOUR fucking laptop.
Honestly, it's a little simpler than that. If it's a private institution, constitutional rights simply don't apply. If the OP is in a public school, then it's a slightly different situation, but a simple waver signed by the student's parents would also wipe privacy concerns on the subject.meganmeave said:Actually, according to the United States Supreme Court, school teachers do indeed act as in loco parentis [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis]. Seeing as how they set the laws of the US, if the OP is in the US, the teachers are paid to act as Big Brother, or more accurately, Big Mother. And Mother has every right to monitor your behavior. The Supreme Court has held that people under the age of 18 do not have the same rights as those over, including certain aspects of free speech and privacy (if you are really interested, Tinker v De Moines [http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/tinker.html] discusses exactly what free speech rights students have, and New Jersey v T.L.O. [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0469_0325_ZS.html] goes into detail about what rights to privacy students can expect) The court has pretty much stated that if conduct by a student disrupts the normal classwork of the institution, then that conduct is not protected by the constitution. It really depends on whether or not the OP is in the US. I am not familiar with the laws of other countries regarding this.FalloutJack said:Use of the internet cannot be denied since it's necessary for work purposes. Invasion of your effing laptop cannot be allowed because it's your laptop. Answer: The school has to cave in because they must further education and the completion of work. They are not paid to act as Big Brother. No, they really aren't.Aris Khandr said:And their internet connection. Your point doesn't really hold up.FalloutJack said:No, because this isn't even a case of Sony and the PS3. It's YOUR fucking laptop.
Does that make it right? Well, that's another issue entirely.
I think you'll find that they can take mobile phones, it is perfectly legal, and not theft. You will find that when you enroll to the school you will be made to sign a compliance form that covers all of this. Whilst I do agree that is probably not right that they should be able to confiscate your property, when you join the school you basically sign your soul away and allow them to do things like this.EternalFacepalm said:Oak's words echoed... "Ash! There is a time and place for everything! But not now!"Adrian Neyland said:They are allowed to, they should be allowed to, school is not meant for Facebook, you probably have plenty of time at home for that, I do not wish to be a killjoy but you have to realize that there is a time and a place for everything.
[sub]I had to do that...[/sub]
But yeah, they're allowed to. I wouldn't say they should, but they can.
Taking peoples' phones, on the other hand, is theft. You can report them to the police if you're really desperate for your phone, I guess.
There are 3G USB sticks which you pay for monthly. Using those, if not against the rules, shouldn't get you in trouble, because you're not using their connection, therefore they don't require registering. It will also only work if you bring your own laptop. Still, they might decide to put in a small bit in the school rules, banning their use and closing that loophole behind you.Starke said:Depending on how the network is set up, that probably wouldn't help at all. Any unregistered wireless device would get routed to a choke page telling you to register the device. So unless you could set it to spoof faculty access...Voodoomancer said:One solution might be to get a USB wireless dongle. Lets you connect to the internet without the school wireless OR a phone, and if anyone asks you can say it's a USB memory stick.
No waiver. It's a public middle school in the U S of A. The cell phone is written into our student policy (rules for the kiddies). The must sign the policy within a week of entering the school. Few kids even read it...shame, but most people tend to ignore reading through rules that can affect them.Starke said:I'm guessing you're operating under such a waver.Fleischer said:Not in the least bit. In my time teaching, I've given a few dozen stern warnings, and when I've ran into egregious cases, I've confiscated a few phones. A school staff member can confiscate a phone, or similar objects, if their usage or possession is banned by school rules.
I did! You don't need the internet to teach the majority of what you learn in school.FalloutJack said:Why? I didn't.Aris Khandr said:Funny, I managed to get through school just fine without internet access. I'm sure many of us here did. Believe it or not, you do not need it all the time. If you want to use their internet access, you follow their rules.