I'd need one that can simultaneously run Photoshop, Illustrator, Lightwave, multiple browser windows, several PDFs and music being played in lossless formats.octafish said:Give me a console that can run Photoshop and I'll consider buying one.
I'd need one that can simultaneously run Photoshop, Illustrator, Lightwave, multiple browser windows, several PDFs and music being played in lossless formats.octafish said:Give me a console that can run Photoshop and I'll consider buying one.
You know I have nothing against consoles and I would not hesitate to get one if I couldM0PHEAD said:This thread seems to be split into two halves: those who say having a mid/high range pc allows you to enjoy a good standard of gaming with moderate graphics capabilities, and those who sing the praises of having a "super rig" that can out-graphic a console or normal pc by miles. Most of both groups seem quite adamant that "teh keyboards and teh mouses" are superior to a dedicated gaming controller.
To that first group- isn't what you're describing basically the console experience?
"I can play a variety of good games without too much expenditure"- Sounds familiar.
For some reason these days there's a real stereotype concerning the "console-tard". But I've gamed for years on that basic everymans platform, the Xbox 360, and don't think I'm missing out on much. If I'd invested the same money in a pc three or so years ago I'd have an OK computer which I could have used to play a couple of exclusives. Same goes for the PS3 I guess. Or I could have sunk an English grand into a high powered rig and played the same exclusives with better graphics, but been too poor to by food or clothes for the next decade.
As a final point; if mouses and keyboards are so superior for the playing of games, why do machines designed exclusively for gaming use controllers? I get that they can be a bit difficult to use in an RTS if the interface is bad, but done properly (in say, C+C Red Alert 3) they handle OK. And lets face it, it's a damn sight easier to connect four controllers to your Xbox for local multiplayer than it is to squeeze even two people onto a keyboard
I could just be an uneducated console-tard misunderstanding the whole issue, and I agree that PCs make up the ground with game customisability, but... I don't know. At best that puts them level with consoles as a platform.
Except the Wii. That thing can burn in hell.
Well yes, but so can a console right?bahumat42 said:
Yes... But the computer I'm using now can do all of those things, save borderlands which I could play on the Xbox if I so desired.bahumat42 said:you can but not well. Dvd and blue ray may be the same. But who the fuck wants to type out anything using their controller no1 on earth. Add in things like photoshop (or its various free rip off versions), music editing software, graphics design tools, CODING. Chat programs, multitasking. And no you dont need a "high powered computer" this one Im on right now cost me £600 3 years ago and can still run borderlands at a respectable spec.M0PHEAD said:Well yes, but so can a console right?bahumat42 said:
DVD or BLU-RAY capabilities, media streaming (Netflix etc), social networking?
Splitting gaming from other computing tasks lets me have an entry level laptop for work, the internet and other computing tasks whilst still being able to enjoy the most recent titles on my console.
To replace both of these with a single high powered computer for gaming without additional expenditure would necessitate a desktop setup- something which wouldn't work for me because of the lack of portability.
Not to mention that if I did this I'd miss out on console exclusive games, and no longer be able to game with my immediate social group (who are all console owners).
The last two points are unique to you and down to personal choice. (Which again is fine but hardly a point to use on an objective rundown of their abilities.)