First of all I realise you are a primary school teacher here, but I'll be talking about high school during this post. Primary school PE lessons are very, very different from High School lessons (at least they were for me) and the thread is about high school. So;
In regards to your point about people being paid money to hit a ball - then yes, you're absolutely right. But how many of those people ended up like that because of a PE program at school? I'd be willing to wager a lot of money that the answer is: none of them.
Going by that logic, there are just as much if not more people making serious money through music and acting. Why not make active participation in front of the whole class compulsory in those areas? After all, people are making money from it right?
The thing I have a problem with is PE lessons being compulsory up until the very senior years of high school. I honestly don't see the point.
I'm sorry if I appear somewhat bitter in this post, but sporting culture annoys the shit out of me. It's "cool" to be able to swing a bat around or kick a football, but it's "uncool" to be about to work out complex physics or mathematical equations, or to be able to write beautiful literature. It's 2010, when the hell are we going to get past this?
And people wonder why the culture we live in is brain dead. Some stupid half wit with no personality and no qualities apart from the fact he is extremely strong gets more air time than the few bright people who are capable of changing the way we live. Kids are brought up to think that the best thing they can be is a sports star. That's ridiculous and my experience with PE lessons have further exemplified this.
Learn to throw and catch off the base of an 80 minute lesson? I doubt it. The kids who can catch are the ones who play sport, are naturally co-ordinated, or were taught to by their fathers. The kids who can't fumble the ball for a few minutes, then go to lunch and forget it all.Reolus said:1. Learn to throw and catch
If by being taught how to run you mean a teacher half demonstrating what to do then being made to run around for an hour, then yes, I guess they are. Nevertheless, the ones who do well are the ones who can run anyway. You can either run or you can't.Reolus said:2. Learn how to run (believe it or not, there is skill required!)
Hah, no way. If you can't swim by the time PE lessons start in high school you are guaranteed to be laughed at and made to feel like shit by the other kids. Absolutely guaranteed, no matter how popular you are. Even if that doesn't happen, you can't learn to swim by going to a PE class once a week for a few weeks before the teachers moving on in a few weeks to the next area of the syllabus.Reolus said:3. Learn how to swim
I agree with these two.Reolus said:4. Understand how to make healthy eating choices
5. Do Sex Ed.
I don't know what experiences you have had, but for me (who has attended 3 schools in three different countries) PE lessons are exactly about being the fastest or the best. All the PE teachers I have encountered are all chummy with the talented athletes (usually because they coach the school teams they are a part of) and the unfit kids just get ignored, or forced to do something that they don't want to do. I do agree with you that the curriculum may not force this to happen, but it does.Reolus said:It's not neccessarily about being the fastest or the best - those kind of social pressures come from being part of a group and being asked to perform, not the curriculum or the teacher themselves, though I am sure there are some exceptions to that rule and some people have bad experiences about what they had to do.
Yes, you're right. Every year more people become fat and more people become unhealthy. This isn't because of PE lessons, this isn't even because of school - this is because of a change in society, and parenting techniques. These things are 100 times bigger than PE lessons, these things actually have serious impacts.Reolus said:Whether you like it or not, there are more obese people and people are less coordinated, because of whatever reasons (technology, society, etc) important physical skills are an aspect of being a capable and successful human being. In fact, some people are paid very well to be successful at hitting a ball or perform some other physical activity.
In regards to your point about people being paid money to hit a ball - then yes, you're absolutely right. But how many of those people ended up like that because of a PE program at school? I'd be willing to wager a lot of money that the answer is: none of them.
Going by that logic, there are just as much if not more people making serious money through music and acting. Why not make active participation in front of the whole class compulsory in those areas? After all, people are making money from it right?
How about the fact that PE lessons only serve the people who are fit and strong to begin with, and if you aren't fit or strong then you have a good chance to be openly ridiculed or mocked?Reolus said:I don't think "because I'm not good at it so it made me feel bad" is just cause for removing the physical element of education.
The thing I have a problem with is PE lessons being compulsory up until the very senior years of high school. I honestly don't see the point.
I'm sorry if I appear somewhat bitter in this post, but sporting culture annoys the shit out of me. It's "cool" to be able to swing a bat around or kick a football, but it's "uncool" to be about to work out complex physics or mathematical equations, or to be able to write beautiful literature. It's 2010, when the hell are we going to get past this?
And people wonder why the culture we live in is brain dead. Some stupid half wit with no personality and no qualities apart from the fact he is extremely strong gets more air time than the few bright people who are capable of changing the way we live. Kids are brought up to think that the best thing they can be is a sports star. That's ridiculous and my experience with PE lessons have further exemplified this.