Too bad the game is a carbon copy of the previous game with a few additions. Too bad both games suck like most Nintendo products. They're boring as fuck.Tharwen said:I think Super Mario Galaxy 2 has had several 10/10 ratings already.
See what you just typed? That's called an opinion. We all have one, and acting like a dick isn't going to make yours any more relevant than his.OmegaXzors said:Too bad the game is a carbon copy of the previous game with a few additions. Too bad both games suck like most Nintendo products. They're boring as fuck.Tharwen said:I think Super Mario Galaxy 2 has had several 10/10 ratings already.
I would but I enjoy those games as well as Risk. Yeah, I prefer to actually read the reviews instead of just base my opinion on the score. That way, I know what the game is actually like (if it's a good reviewer) and I can base my opinion on if it sounds fun to me based on it's content.CokeColaForTheWIn said:Rating games is pontless. Just say if it's fun or not. Would you give a something/10 for chess? or monopoly?
I would say that it would be possible for a "pawn" (common folk) to kill a "knight" if they surprise-attacked them. They would just have to get a good strike through a hole or weak spot in the armor...in other words, they're ninjas!!!Wombaat said:I don't actually likle chess. It always bothered me that a pawn could kill a knight, provided that he got the jump on him, with absolutly no chance of the knight being able to fight back. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I prefer warhammer.
Hey, I've spent more hours playing chess than games, so there is some sense. And it is all about strategizing, playing each piece to its strengths, the pawns are strong BECAUSE they are weak, They are disposable, and they move and attack different squares. They are, collectively, stronger than knights. Thinking of a small royal guard versus a large, still decently armed mob.Wombaat said:I don't actually likle chess. It always bothered me that a pawn could kill a knight, provided that he got the jump on him, with absolutly no chance of the knight being able to fight back. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I prefer warhammer.
Yeah, because there's nobody who reviews boardgames. Oh wait boardgameing subculture does.CokeColaForTheWIn said:Rating games is pontless. Just say if it's fun or not. Would you give a something/10 for chess? or monopoly?