mecegirl said:
He's being a sexist asshole. She's there to talk about business and he won't stop hounding her over past relationship shit. So they had a bad date, big deal. They will probably get (back?)together in the movie, but in real life his attitude would be a big indication to her that she dodged a bullet by not going on a second date.
Not sure if I'd call it sexist, but it has been done to death. Right now they seem to be setting the female character up as what TV tropes calls a Defrosting Ice Queen. Its been done to death, can she not just simply be a scientist lady that's good at her job? Do we really need to imply that she's emotionless and cold instead of just neat and focused? If she were male they wouldn't be so quick to try and force feed us a romantic subplot. The two characters would just not like each other because their personalities were too different. Not because of unresolved sexual tension or whatever.
What made you think she was emotionless and cold...the only indication of that would be Pratt's character's spiel about her not seeing them as anything more than a scientific advancement. Which honestly is probably true, and it's not like neat and focused are the opposites of that. I mean if she was a bleeding heart, people would be complaining about how she's crap at her job because she wasn't focused enough.
And even then, I didn't see her as cold or emotionless, she just doesn't have the same perspective as he does since she works in a lab(presumably) and he works with them directly. Like, c'mon, how many times have they pulled the "scientist doesn't have the same thinking patterns as the normal guy working with their creations because they don't interact with them" in sci-fi? Or how many times have you run into hardcore book-smart nerds that just don't work as well outside of a controlled environment in real life?
Unless of course this is supposed to be a joke post, in which case, I laugh too.