It's a "dickmove" because it's illegalCartman2nd said:Of course the cop is right but that doesn't mean it shouldn't piss you off. Tailing a guy home so you can bust him for being 3 minutes over curfew is a dickmove in whatever universe you are.
It's a "dickmove" because it's illegalCartman2nd said:Of course the cop is right but that doesn't mean it shouldn't piss you off. Tailing a guy home so you can bust him for being 3 minutes over curfew is a dickmove in whatever universe you are.
PK's... naivete is pretty legendary. You should probably start from the position she will never see the world in anything more than black and white if you want to start a monologue with her.ExaltedK9 said:Actually, this is a perspective-seeking thread, so I believe my opinions WERE welcome here. And I don't remember saying anything about the officer doing something illegal, but yea, unethical if you ask me.Pirate Kitty said:It doesn't matter how you think or feel.ExaltedK9 said:My father was a cop. My grandfather was a cop. I plan to be a cop someday. I'm familiar with the law, and cops can exercise discretion in instances like these.Pirate Kitty said:It's not the job of police to pick and choose how and when they enforce the law.ExaltedK9 said:Not everything is black and white. I really think that 3 minutes of minor violation does not equal 2 years of suspension from driving. Theres a time to crack thw whip, and theres a time to let things slide. This was one of those times.Pirate Kitty said:Cop was in the right.
Neighbor was in the wrong.
The officer did his job.
Period.
There is no issue of ethics or illegal activity on the part of the officer.
He enforced the law on someone breaking the law.
Get over it.
Lawful discretion is a policy, not something I "think or feel". An officer has a right to exercise it, and I feel that he should have in this case.
You disagree. I don't really care, I just hope its not exercised on you the next time you're pulled over for inevitably doing something stupid.
I sure don't because... ... ... ... ... it's bad.Ahlycks said:the curfew is only for kids like 16-18. it's to protect them from getting hurt. Do you want 16-18 year olds driving around past midnight?JinxyKatte said:Where the fuck is this? Cos if its in a "free" country a curfew is fucking bullshit to begin with. This fucks me right the way off. Cop is a cocking cock stain.Ahlycks said:/threadPirate Kitty said:Cop was in the right.
Neighbor was in the wrong.
so, umm, why do you question it? He should have just left earlier. You need to be prepared for this stuff when you have such a responsibility.
It is not "fair" per se, but it is the law.
I may or may not support that law, but all that matters is that IT IS the law, and the law should be respected.
If you seriously want to make a change in the law, go talk to court about allowing 16 year olds to be able to drive at midnight. Complaining to me on the escapist about how the law is evil will not help that law change.
Lady Luck can be a real *****... Probably what the cop might have said.zama174 said:What if there was a traffic jam? Or some such unexpected thing happened that left him stuck?
When you're late for work once you aren't immediately fired. Yeah, it looks bad and may result in that if you're late too often, but usually being a minute late isn't a big deal. Besides, this is coming home. There's no absolute reason to be at your house at a specific time. The law is to prevent them from being out partying at 1 and driving drunk, which is somewhat understandable, but the guy was on his way home. Once the cop saw that he should've let it go.Ahlycks said:if you are late to work because of a traffic jam you will be responsible for being late as well.TestECull said:The cop is a dick. Three minutes? Following him all the way home? That's some grade a bullshit right there. There might even be some profiling involved.
So you believe he should be held responsible because he got caught up in a traffic jam he had no idea about before he left?Ahlycks said:so, umm, why do you question it? He should have just left earlier. You need to be prepared for this stuff when you have such a responsibility.
It's life. It's not fair, but that is just how the world works
Your last point is true, but if after following the guy all the way home and not seeing anything ticketable, then just dropping him on cerfew charges because he was feeling buthurt isn't. The rest is utter bullcrap. Was Hitler right for killing all the Jews? no. but the law is the law, so everyone sat around while it happened. Government officials aren't some infalliable heroes: most of them are corrupt douches. This isn't nearly that bad, I'm aware, that was to drive the point in. That doesn't make it any more right to sit around and blindly accept whatever the government does though.Ahlycks said:the curfew is only for kids like 16-18. it's to protect them from getting hurt. Do you want 16-18 year olds driving around past midnight?JinxyKatte said:Where the fuck is this? Cos if its in a "free" country a curfew is fucking bullshit to begin with. This fucks me right the way off. Cop is a cocking cock stain.Ahlycks said:/threadPirate Kitty said:Cop was in the right.
Neighbor was in the wrong.
so, umm, why do you question it? He should have just left earlier. You need to be prepared for this stuff when you have such a responsibility.
It is not "fair" per se, but it is the law.
I may or may not support that law, but all that matters is that IT IS the law, and the law should be respected.
If you seriously want to make a change in the law, go talk to court about allowing 16 year olds to be able to drive at midnight. Complaining to me on the escapist about how the law is evil will not help that law change.
Sure, you may argue that it's not fair and that people with less than 2 years of experience should be allowed to drive until 4 am, but the law is the law, and it should be respected. Sure, that cop was a little bit of an asshole, but if he let him off, he would be bending the law for the kid. It's his job.
Also, not to mention that the kid probably did something to catch the guys attention while driving. policemen do not tail someone for looking young.
No, the cop was not in the right.Pirate Kitty said:Cop was in the right.
Neighbor was in the wrong.
That would also be illegal for the cop to do, according to U.S. law.Scout Tactical said:If the cop tailed him home and asked to see his vehicle inspection, found it expired, and ticketed him, I'd think the same thing.
Dude a curfew? Im intrested to know where do you live. North Korea or something?Poofs said:As the curfew was midnight he was technically violating it
Actually, the police officer's actions were illegal because he cited him without reasonable cause. It's illegal in the U.S. to pull over a motorist because of suspicion he's violating license provisions, there has to be evidence of some other illegal activity.Ahlycks said:i'm 16 and I really would not want either me or my friends to drive past then. Not only do you get tired,out driving skills are not exactly perfect.Amalith said:And yes, 16-18 year olds should be allowed to drive whenever the fuck they want when they have a license. Just because they're minors doens't mean they're not people. And by that age I was pretty responsible, even if some arbitrary law said I was less of a person because I was two years younger than I was supposed to be.
Did you know in Greece you cannot even drive until you are 18? I think it is a privilege even be able to drive at all at that age.
Anyway, like I said at least 10 times on this stupid thread, IT'S THE LAW. If you think it is unfair, TAKE IT UP TO COURT. What will whining to me do? nothing!
I may have been picked as the few kids in america to go and study law at DC, but i'm no government official. You can argue all you want but all that does is make you look like a dick. Do to the actual government if you want to change it
I don't want to go into the whole story right now, but now it's "Driving while being white, male, and older than 50."Jamboxdotcom said:it is indeed the law. and although i don't necessarily think it's fair, i would point out that "driving while 16" is a much bigger public hazard than the old standby "driving while black".
besides, i want those darn kids off my lawn!
If he was tailing the guy, he could have been tailing him for a good 3 minutes. Why did he wait? If he ran the plates and the kid came up on the car and it had his age, then the cop should have stopped him at midnight. I have a couple friends who have been caught after curfew. They got a ticket. No license suspension. The court will probably throw this out. The cop probably got yelled at by his teenage son before his shift and was taking out frustration...Pirate Kitty said:It doesn't matter how you think or feel.ExaltedK9 said:My father was a cop. My grandfather was a cop. I plan to be a cop someday. I'm familiar with the law, and cops can exercise discretion in instances like these.Pirate Kitty said:It's not the job of police to pick and choose how and when they enforce the law.ExaltedK9 said:Not everything is black and white. I really think that 3 minutes of minor violation does not equal 2 years of suspension from driving. Theres a time to crack thw whip, and theres a time to let things slide. This was one of those times.Pirate Kitty said:Cop was in the right.
Neighbor was in the wrong.
The officer did his job.
Period.
There is no issue of ethics or illegal activity on the part of the officer.
He enforced the law on someone breaking the law.
Get over it.