Smokej said:
funguy2121 said:
(1) (snipped the pseudo-intellectual dead weight...)
The point is that simply because someone has achieved something in a specific field doesn't mean that they should be viewed as a guru on everything in life.
(2) It seems that you missed the point of my statement...That does say of course little about his creativity or film-making skills other than that he has a solid educational foundation to work with.
(3) But aside from that
Uwe's publictiy work is high-grade entertainment material and you can't deny that he has keen business sense in his professional directing and producing work. And the grade of media infamy he recieves, shows that there always is somekind of interest in his works and himself.
(4) So yeah i like him as a character and even his trashy movies can be really entertaining to watch while you're hanging around with your buddys and listening to his ridiculous audio commentary.
(1) How incredibly rude for a person who basically said
but he went to Harvard! to defend a creator of naive camp.
(2) That was exactly the "psuedo-intellectual dead weight" that you snipped. That
was my point. Too bad you then ignored our mutual point when you said...
(3) ...this. Before any Uwe Boll fans start flaming in response to this, let's be clear: I'm only making a comparison based on what you said, and mean to compare the two personalities in this way and this way only. Westboro Baptist Church and its leader, Fred Phelps, are now household names. Does this mean that Phelps has a strong business savvy? More to the point, does that make him a good spiritual leader? Defenders of (Metallica drummer) Lars Ulrich love to point out that he and James take care of the business end of the band pretty much on their own. If you've ever read or watched or listened to an interview with Ulrich, you know that he's a very intelligent and down-to-earth guy. Does that have any bearing on the fact that, since the early 90's, he hasn't done anything at all that was creative, original or inspired behind the kit?
Also, I'm not sure what
this is intended to mean.
(4) He's a human being. MovieBob addressed this with Michael Bay, and that's exactly how I feel, both about Bay and about Boll. My cousin has worked with Michael Bay (he did the CGI for Devastator in the second Transformers film), and has a lot of respect for the man's work ethic. I'm not going to besmirch someone as a person because I don't like their art. Again, watch the movie
Heckler. I believe you referred to the boxing match so you've probably already seen it. Most critics are cynical assholes who are failed filmmakers themselves. Out of this group, there is a smaller but still very vocal group who love to call any shitty filmmaker the harbinger of the apocalypse because, like many escapists, they are more melodramatic than insecure teenagers. So, if it isn't clear, let me reiterate one more time: I have absolutely no problem with Uwe Boll as a person because, like you, I don't know him. I just can't stand his films because they are insipid to the point of insulting the audience.