A NewClassic Rant about... Well... Ranting.
I often fine that some of my hardest challenges is really figuring out what's bothering me sometimes. All forms of singling-out are hard for me to do because I can never really come to terms with exactly what's bothering me. It seems like a communal thing most days.
There's never just a single little problem in a day. Moods are a bit like snowballs in that all it takes is a little push for a large mess to come crashing down. It seems so completely absurd that one little problem could cause an entire trainwreck, but life is as hinged on the details as it is the main points.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a395/NewClassic/Forum%20Stuff/Escapist/10089800.jpg
The biggest frustration for me is knowing that no matter how specific or detail-oriented life's examination can become, there's always the one random variable throwing a spanner in the works.
But the spanner itself isn't usually the problem. Usually you can identify the biggest underlying factor. Standing in the abandoned husk of a house charred to the drywall should be proof enough that a fire burned the house down. The biggest job is to look at the still-smoking remains of what was once a domicile and asking oneself, "I wonder what caused the house to go up like that?" Sure, fire was what happened to the house, but what happened to the fire?
Examining that seems to be the key to problem-solving, but isolating the variable just doesn't seem like it's wanting to be conducive to whole process. Math doesn't teach people proper mathematics as much as it teaches people life lessons. Problems are rarely as simple as "57 + 92." The steps to solve that sort of thing are easy. Problems are usually something along the lines of "3x[sup]2[/sup] + 2xy + 57y[sup]2[/sup] + 5[sup]y[/sup] = (7y + 2xy + 1)[sup]xy[/sup]". Problems become about deconstruction. The core of the problem comes in finding the parts you need to solve it to begin with. The first step in this long and convoluted process is always isolating the variable.
Most lately, I've been having trouble discerning exactly where I see flaws in things. I could not say whether or not my apparently negative commentary on the Watchmen was more a function of my distaste for the movie or if it was the end result of my tumbling mood of late. My initial frustrations with many of the games I've been playing lately might be the direct result of the mood instead of any fault on the game's design or aesthetic.
http://www.columbia.edu/~sl2403/gnuplot/fig/sample4.4b.png
Life would be admittedly easier if all problems could work out to be obvious flaws. The proverbial problem Black-Box. Standing in the ruins of a fallen civilization wondering "The hell happened to these people?" We just need to check the Black-Box and see, "Oh! Nuclear fallout. Why did no one think to use the Geiger counter?"
Problems won't fold out to be x=y. They hardly ever will. The challenge in life is taking those steps and isolating the variables. Life would ostensibly be easier if all of the problems had as simple a solution as pressing x repeatedly. I'm not entirely convinced it would be better though.
Maybe there's something special about having to work for solutions to life's problems. Parents often tell their children that conflict builds character. Maybe pulling yourself up from the bicycle crash is as telling about problem actually going through the crash to begin with. Maybe over-thinking about the problems and their roots is part of the problem itself. Maybe I should focus on problem-solution instead of problem-understanding.
Discussion Topic
Do life's problems need to be cut off at the head? Or should they be unraveled with the pluck of the offending thread? Or should life be more about working around problems instead of examining them? Or is it all conjecture and a pointless exercise anyway?