I've personally am sick and tired of all the rah rah jarhead-marine type BS. As soon as another country makes the a game about the exploits of their culturealbiet some fudge, AS ALL GAMES, and movies do. Its propaganda. Way to go double standard.
WingedFortress said:Snip
And so it begins.Stiffkittin said:Snip
Captain Ahab was the main character in Moby Dick.fnartilter said:No clue who Ahab is.
This isn't a "game". Its a tool in game form used to address an age group that still responds to flashy lights, colors, and yes, videogames.feather240 said:This isn't mandatory for anyone. They have as much right to promote their own government as we have to promote our own values. If you don't want to play the game you don't have to.
Is this sarcasm or no? Have you ever heard of America's Army?KalosCast said:It's a good thing that the United States government would never make propaganda video games to support their military.
That's a strawman, and I know that you know that.Stiffkittin said:So I should only post neutral and appeasing comments? I have no control over where this article was posted.
Hell, even if the OP did a perfectly neutral "I have no strong feelings one way or the other" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ussCHoQttyQ] news post, it'd still break out to a convoluted, 10+ flame war that will basically end with a "Get your peanut butter out of my chocolate!" "No, you get your chocolate out of my peanut butter!" "No you-! Wait, what were we arguing about again?" "Get your chocola-....wait..."I wholeheartedly agree though. The topic and tone of the OP may have been ill-considered for the front page feed.
So do the Japanese. Remember kids, when you play Metal Gear Solid, Hideo Kojima wants you to know that nukes are bad.Misterpinky said:Heck, us Americans do that already. Ever played a Tom Clancy or Call of Duty game?
Bias? Where?Misterpinky said:Heck, us Americans do that already. Ever played a Tom Clancy or Call of Duty game?
There is so much win in that statement,mjc0961 said:Remember kids, when you play Metal Gear Solid, Hideo Kojima wants you to know that nukes are bad.
And he and his duck are super serious about that:
Really? :S Bleh, I thought for sure it was, I like feeling smart! Isn't a strawman arguing a point that your opponent didn't actually make? Like "I think we should regulate alcohol better" and then someone going "Oh, so nobody should ever be allowed to drink any beverage ever?" That's a strawman, isn't it (at least according to Wikipedia)?Stiffkittin said:Wow, people sure love throwing that term around these days don't they? What happened to the good old days where literary prowess was judged by wild exaggerations flung with abandon and the raw imagination of one's hyberbole? *Sigh* That was entertainment ;P
Seriously though, it would have been a strawman fallacy if I'd actually been arguing a point. In fact I was only posing you a straightforward question. Your inference being that the thread would be better served without the conflict this topic invariably raises.
Hmm, good point. I didn't intend it to be coming off as patronizing, more negotiating (I guess is the right word) or something. I get that people like to argue/debate (whatever you want to call it), though I'd rather we kept volatile topics like this out of the more public newsroom.The imperfection of nations and their machinations is a given, you are totally right there. You seem like a reasonable guy who wants to encourage reasonable discussion, which is great. So I know then that you didn't mean it that way; but might I suggest that your slightly patronizing first comment would have done more to inflame argument, if I were a foaming-at-the-mouth pro-Palestinan supporter?