My favorite Science-fiction writer, ever. Sure some of the novels drag on and the Foundation series is overdone, but a good bulk of his work is pretty awesome.
As an indepenent reading selection, I chose two novels not concerned with the continuation of Asimov's more prolific series: The God's Themselves and The End of Eternity. The former, if you didn't know already, deals with parallel universes and the exchange of matter therin, and the latter deals with time travel and it's many, many confusing array's of reality. I loved both. Each had more finesse than I've seen from Asimov and he paints a picture much more abundantly in both novels. Yet, he doesn't elaborate on detail as so many writers get caught up on. Much of both novels relies heavily on actual science instead of made-up stuff, which is rather a staple of the Sci-fi Genre.
So my question to you is your opinion on this writer, his books, comparisons, and the use of science in Sci-fi.
As an indepenent reading selection, I chose two novels not concerned with the continuation of Asimov's more prolific series: The God's Themselves and The End of Eternity. The former, if you didn't know already, deals with parallel universes and the exchange of matter therin, and the latter deals with time travel and it's many, many confusing array's of reality. I loved both. Each had more finesse than I've seen from Asimov and he paints a picture much more abundantly in both novels. Yet, he doesn't elaborate on detail as so many writers get caught up on. Much of both novels relies heavily on actual science instead of made-up stuff, which is rather a staple of the Sci-fi Genre.
So my question to you is your opinion on this writer, his books, comparisons, and the use of science in Sci-fi.