I like the 360 analog sticks the way they are, nothing more, nothing else.migo said:While comfort would lead to a preference, I don't see something being comfortable or uncomfortable in itself as a preference. How would you not still find the right stick uncomfortable with the staggered layout if you find them both uncomfortable with the symmetrical layout?Stone Wera said:What? It's just a personal preference.migo said:This doesn't make any sense to me. I could see the lower position potentially being a problem (for some reason, couldn't say what right now), but I can't see how having a symmetrical design is a problem but if it's asymmetrical you're not still having problems with one of the sticks.Stone Wera said:I prefer the original design, symmetrical analog sticks are uncomfortable for me.
The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.WilliamRLBaker said:So we have no way to prove or believe you have just an xbox, 360 and ps2...and when did owning something mean you had no bias?
I own a 360, wii, ps3, psp, and ds, and I am completely biased against the ps3 and wii.
Owning something means nothing.
You are being disagreed with by nearly 80% of the thread with your claims of the 360 controller being bad, having bad ergonomics...ect the 360 controller is one of the most comfy and usable controllers out there right now.
Or you have long fingers and your thumbs end up resting such that the tips are off the buttons, if you hold the controller the way they want you to. Were the palm rests angled down and the sticks placed side by side it would be much easier to get a proper grip and use the tip of your thumbs for the buttons.Mr_Universal said:It´s physically impossible to have your thumbs like that, unless you´re used to be using the ps3...which is made for small hands...
Your absolutely right, but only because it is impossible for an opinion to be objectively right or wrong. Even if 90% of the people agreed with him it wouldn't make him right, because it's an opinion.shadow skill said:The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.
Because the right stick is only used about half the time, while the buttons are used the other half. The left stick, however, is used the vast majority of the time so it needs so be in the more comfortable position.migo said:While comfort would lead to a preference, I don't see something being comfortable or uncomfortable in itself as a preference. How would you not still find the right stick uncomfortable with the staggered layout if you find them both uncomfortable with the symmetrical layout?
Not all opinions are impossible to prove or disprove. You can have the opinion that using rusted screws to put a chair together has no effect on the strength of the chair. I can prove that it does in fact have a negative effect on the strength of the chair.Pyode said:Your absolutely right, but only because it is impossible for an opinion to be objectively right or wrong. Even if 90% of the people agreed with him it wouldn't make him right, because it's an opinion.shadow skill said:The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.
Because the right stick is only used about half the time, while the buttons are used the other half. The left stick, however, is used the vast majority of the time so it needs so be in the more comfortable position.migo said:While comfort would lead to a preference, I don't see something being comfortable or uncomfortable in itself as a preference. How would you not still find the right stick uncomfortable with the staggered layout if you find them both uncomfortable with the symmetrical layout?
Anyway, this whole conversation is pointless anyway. You are tying to argue your opinions as objective facts, which never works.
Why can't you just accept that some people like the 360 controller the way it is and leave it be?
pretty sure every one disagreeing with him=making him wrong.shadow skill said:The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.WilliamRLBaker said:So we have no way to prove or believe you have just an xbox, 360 and ps2...and when did owning something mean you had no bias?
I own a 360, wii, ps3, psp, and ds, and I am completely biased against the ps3 and wii.
Owning something means nothing.
You are being disagreed with by nearly 80% of the thread with your claims of the 360 controller being bad, having bad ergonomics...ect the 360 controller is one of the most comfy and usable controllers out there right now.
WRONGshadow skill said:Not all opinions are impossible to prove or disprove. You can have the opinion that using rusted screws to put a chair together has no effect on the strength of the chair. I can prove that it does in fact have a negative effect on the strength of the chair.
An opinion is, by definition, unprovable. Once you prove it, it is no longer an opinion and becomes fact.Opinion: belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
First of all, 80% is not "everyone."WilliamRLBaker said:pretty sure every one disagreeing with him=making him wrong.
So what you are telling me is that it is physically possible to move with the right stick, and press any of the buttons on the right side of the controller at the same time, all while holding the controller in the correct manner? Before you answer that, think about why things like reload, jump, and melee are on the right side of the controller on the standard layout of pretty much all console shooters.WilliamRLBaker said:pretty sure every one disagreeing with him=making him wrong.shadow skill said:The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.WilliamRLBaker said:So we have no way to prove or believe you have just an xbox, 360 and ps2...and when did owning something mean you had no bias?
I own a 360, wii, ps3, psp, and ds, and I am completely biased against the ps3 and wii.
Owning something means nothing.
You are being disagreed with by nearly 80% of the thread with your claims of the 360 controller being bad, having bad ergonomics...ect the 360 controller is one of the most comfy and usable controllers out there right now.
the 360 is one of the most ergonomically minded controllers on the planet, and bar its dpad is one of the most comfy and usable controllers. And my mom is left handed and has no problem with southpaw controls in most games when I can get her to play...
Umm no you don't know what an opinion actually is. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/opinionPyode said:WRONGshadow skill said:Not all opinions are impossible to prove or disprove. You can have the opinion that using rusted screws to put a chair together has no effect on the strength of the chair. I can prove that it does in fact have a negative effect on the strength of the chair.
An opinion is, by definition, unprovable. Once you prove it, it is no longer an opinion and becomes fact.Opinion: belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
Controller preference is an opinion, because you can not prove that the PS3 controller is more comfortable than the 360 controller. It is my opinion that the 360 controller is currently the best on the market. You may think otherwise, and that's fine, but don't try to argue that my opinion is objectively wrong, because you can't.
You have no way of proving that, but trying to claim someone owns something and is biased against a certain company based on disliking a certain aspect of a product is ridiculous.WilliamRLBaker said:So we have no way to prove or believe you have just an xbox, 360 and ps2...and when did owning something mean you had no bias?
I own a 360, wii, ps3, psp, and ds, and I am completely biased against the ps3 and wii.
Owning something means nothing.
You are being disagreed with by nearly 80% of the thread with your claims of the 360 controller being bad, having bad ergonomics...ect the 360 controller is one of the most comfy and usable controllers out there right now.
The original Xbox was thrown together using PC components to get it out the door, and MS didn't listen to any advice from actual users testing it for the original controller. The 360 was once again rushed out the door, and given the minimal changes there's no validity in a claim that MS suddenly put more effort into actually testing the controller. Hell, there weren't even any variations. Sony experimented with a few alternates for the PS3 and then decided they weren't good so went back to the DualShock design. Perfect examples of Microsoft not putting any thought into the 360 controller design is the D-Pad and Bumpers, the former which just sucks and the latter which is clearly an afterthought. Now given that the D-Pad and Bumpers were just thrown on there because of how they looked rather than actually being tested or put through any sort of quality control, the notion that they had any sort of competent testing or quality control for the rest of the components is pretty ludicrous.WilliamRLBaker said:pretty sure every one disagreeing with him=making him wrong.shadow skill said:The fact that most people who have replied disagree with him has no bearing on whether he is right or not. People disagree with me all the time that the Southpaw layouts in most console games are trash, it doesn't make them right since these layouts typically make basic actions almost physically impossible to perform if you hold the controller in a normal way.WilliamRLBaker said:So we have no way to prove or believe you have just an xbox, 360 and ps2...and when did owning something mean you had no bias?
I own a 360, wii, ps3, psp, and ds, and I am completely biased against the ps3 and wii.
Owning something means nothing.
You are being disagreed with by nearly 80% of the thread with your claims of the 360 controller being bad, having bad ergonomics...ect the 360 controller is one of the most comfy and usable controllers out there right now.
the 360 is one of the most ergonomically minded controllers on the planet, and bar its dpad is one of the most comfy and usable controllers. And my mom is left handed and has no problem with southpaw controls in most games when I can get her to play...
Funny that you should ask this. Why can't the majority of respondents to this thread accept that I don't like the 360 controller the way it is and that I'm happy to find something that lets me keep playing it and leave it be?Pyode said:Why can't you just accept that some people like the 360 controller the way it is and leave it be?