s69-5 said:
Stranger of Sorts said:
The tactics system and tactics available are really nothing special, I would point you toward Final Fantasy XII which has an almost identical system but the spell combos are a lot more interesting thanks to the huge variety of spells.
*Cough* and Priority *Cough*.
Priority might have saved DA:O's system... Wasted potential.
But the tatics in Dragon Age do have priority, if the conditions for both 1 and 3 are met then tatic 1 will occur before tatic 3.
At least thats how I think it works.
*Checks DA wiki*
Yeah tatics higher on the list have priority, so unless I missunderstod you...
veloper said:
A review is not a detective novel.
Good thing this review looks nothing like a novel.
veloper said:
In many fields starting with the conclusion and then follow up with how you came to that conclusion is actually the preferred method.
But not in reviews, at least not in reviews correctly formatted.
This review is not perfect, when Stranger of Sorts can craft a masterwork review then he can start messing with the formula.
veloper said:
In a game review you can do both and starting wih the conclusion is simply more convenient for the reader.
This is allready a short review, its not asking much for people to read it.
veloper said:
If you don't, many readers will scroll to the last paragraph anyway, before deciding if the piece is worth reading.
You mean you want a TL/DR at the top of the review? Pandering to the lazy?
This brings up a good point, why include a forward for the lazy when those people are likely to just jump to the end anyway?