NinjaDeathSlap said:
The 'story' behind the pepper spay thing was that these women had been backed into a corner and separated from the rest of the protesters. They were in no position to be a threat to anyone and even if they were they weren't trying anything. The Police then suddenly decide to pepper spray them both for no reason. I don't care if the effects go away after a while, pepper spray is nasty shit and I somehow doubt that you have ever felt it if you're so keen to shrug it off as nothing. They were causing two defenseless people intense pain just for kicks. That's not just Police brutality, that's torture.
Ehh. I'm not sure there is any support for that. First I think a bunch of things need to be ruled out first, e.x. misreading a situation, exhaustion, fear, anger. They all pretty much range from mistakes to flat out bad, but for fun is a different level.
NinjaDeathSlap said:
Let's take it from the top. "Well, he kinda worked for it." Correction, some of them worked for it. There are just as many others, particularly in government and the banking sector, who got their jobs and their huge salaries not because they were the best qualified, not because they were the hardest worker, but because they had connections. They could attend the right parties, schmooze the right people, and drop the right names, while people more talented than them get to continue sitting on the scrap heap because they didn't get a leg-up. Believe me, there's nothing that annoys me more than laziness, but even I have to admit that when you're born in the wrong neighborhood it doesn't matter how talented or ambitious you are, you're always going to be the little guy; and because big business has such a hold on government policy, they get pretty much free reign to shit on the little guy as much as they like. The protesters are right, that isn't fair.
It may not be fair, but for a private company, it isn't the public's business either. As you did point out, government or government contracting does change things.
NinjaDeathSlap said:
"They may have started it but everybody contributed to it". Yes, the culture of a 'buy now, pay later' economy existed on all levels of society. People borrowed and overspent for the sake of short term benefit without thinking about long-term implications. The financial crisis shouldn't have been a shock, it had been coming for a while and so no particular entity can hold all of the blame. However, you have to ask yourself, 'Who were the big players in propping up this system?'
Fair.
NinjaDeathSlap said:
'Who could have warned people to change in order to avoid this, but instead chose to bury their heads in the sand rather than give up their short-term profits?' The answer is certainly the big banks, and to a lesser extent the government. We all had a part in steering that ship, but they were on the bridge, telling us where to go, and now we have to take action to make sure they can't be allowed to have that level of control anymore.
I think that absolves the populace a bit too much. If we elect people who promise increases to government assistance/reduced taxes and don't elect people who want to shrink the debt, it shouldn't be a surprise when the debt grows larger.