'Massive' seems to be the right word, yeah X3Zombie_Fish said:Given that it was published in a journal called 'The Annals of Improbable Research', I think we can safely trust in their margins of error being absolutely massive. =PNoX 9 said:A fairly dodgy paper that I would personally be a bit careful putting too much trust in, but yeah. Close enough I suppose! I think a longterm study on a larger sample is required to determine this important question once and for all.Zombie_Fish said:Apparently this is actually the right answer. It's from a paper called 'The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers [http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2012/10/05/friday-weird-science-how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck/]'.
Science!