Japanese Tales of Vesperia Fans Upset Over PS3 Port

[squid5580]

Enchanted Arms [...] was far too easy, even for an RPG.

Easy if you picked the right puppet things at the beginning and boosted them. I couldn't beat the last bosses since I didn't choose right and refused to spend forever grinding.

I just used the four main characters as soon as they were available. Didn't bother with the monsters apart from when one of the humans wasn't available.

I took a team of monsters that I liked. It bit me in the ass at the end.

 

[HyenaThePirate]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, anyone claiming a 3rd party game is exclusive this day and age, is a moron for believing it. Absolutely retarded. There's no amount of money MS or Sony would be willing to pay, to overshadow the reality of a user base in excess of 24 million or more. You're daft if you believe otherwise.

See? Now you and I agree again

I've said it over and over and over. There is no such thing as "exclusivity", only TIMED Exclusives when it comes to THIRD PARTY games. At some point that game will probably end up on another system, either improved, or as a bundle with any others in the series. For example.. at some point I fully expect to someday see a "Metal Gear Solid Collection" with ALL the Metal Gear games in one massive game collection available on a future generation console by Microsoft or a Halo Collection someday on the PS4 or whatever a decade or so down the line.

Money is money. Pissing contests between console fan-boys don't make money, GAMES do.

You may end up seeing MGS4 on something other than a Sony console, dunno, would've thought it'd hit by now. You know? But I will definitely disagree on Halo. That has as much chance of going Sony as Gran Turismo going MS...which is none =).

Either way, Timed exclusivity is indeed the name of the game now. Looks like Sony's going to end up with the advantage on that end though, since they seem to release a revamped game each time.

Maybe since Microsoft actually OWNS Halo... but who is to say in 10 year's time? At one point people thought you'd NEVER see SONIC, the mascot for a company who waged a bitter console war with Nintendo in the past, on a Nintendo platform.
Now you can get just about every sonic game EVER MADE on the Nintendo.
At some point, consoles will go by the wayside in place of pure software development.
When that happens, you'll see OLD exclusive games make their way to the PC and everywhere else..

 

[Feylynn]

This is fairly old post but I'm bored and ended up here. =p
(Really not sure how I ended up here, just kinda started writing. <.< )

I can say I would be "severely displeased" to have a +Version of a game released on a random console as I have regretted front line purchases of KH years down the road every time and missed all that content.

That said they don't really expect to get anything here right? In my opinion Game content is developer property. It's like buying a really interactive painting from a giant multi-faceted Dev/Art-Hydra. You are free to hang, hide, sell, burn, eat the finished product, but it will always be the creator's work. If they painter comes into a random assortment of homes and puts a well textured mustache on the finished product for free because he felt the art needed something more. Is it wrong if he leaves half the people out?

There, I have now made this question significantly sillier.

Long story less psychotically put; I know why they are mad, but the Devs can add what they want when they want, at least they aren't RETROACTIVELY REMOVING CONTENT from the previous version.

(No one would ever remove content from a finished product though, would they Sony?)

 

[Warachia]

I think removing Patty Fluer from the game is a completely reasonable and just demand, on the whole though, just suck it up guys, it's not as if Namco did a coup d'état.