If it was a world in which Ride to Hell: Retribution was somehow actually a good game, sure, why not?Falterfire said:You say you want to love all games, but do you really?
Do you really want to even imagine a world in which Ride to Hell: Retribution was a title which brought you unadulterated joy and cheer?
I've seen far too many sneering comments about Dragon Age II's 5/5 review to not believe it's a thing.canadamus_prime said:I cannot believe that this is actually a thing. I think "idiot" is being far too kind to people like that.
Oh it was more that there were less dialogue options than other, wonky mechanics (the space bar did the same), and I remember loads of animation and gameplay glitches. Nothing Game Breaking but the game should have spent another year in development, 2 years wasn't enough, especially for a big RPG like the ones Bioware do.xNicolex said:What exactly was rushed about ME3? There was nothing rubbished about ME3 at all, people were just upset that they didn't like the ending, which was pathetic really.ex275w said:Rushed games like Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that. I like /v/, the community speaks to me.carnege4 said:That's actually /v/ on a nutshell.
Reviews can't be 100% objective, they have to mix subjective opinion and objective facts (this game has 10 missions, it costs 60$, etc.) and form those objective facts write why the game is worth buying, renting, stealing from Gamestop, breaking or waiting until the price goes down. (For example the game has 10 missions, that's not a whole lot of variety 1/10)Thanatos2k said:See, the source of the problem here is that people get really mad when you like something they dislike. And yes, paradoxically it's not as bad as someone hating something you like.
When someone hates something you like, you KNOW they're wrong. After all, you played it, you liked it, and no one can take that away from you.
When someone likes something you hate, there's that small terrifying possibility that....maybe you're wrong. That provokes the biggest rage every time, because you now have to PROVE you're not wrong to yourself, by protesting in the loudest most obnoxious way possible.
One addendum though: Hating a review/review score is not quite the same as hating someone else because they like something. That perfect Dragon Age 2 score IS a travesty, not because the reviewer liked the game, but because professional reviews are supposed to be more than just whether the reviewer liked it or not, they're supposed to be a rational objective analysis of the components at play, and any objective analysis of the quality of Dragon Age 2 will find it wanting.
I have brought up the absolute language thing before too, its a great point that people will dismiss as too wishy washy in writing, but I agree.Charcharo said:I just knew this was going to be this week's topic...
Meh I am easy.
I am sad one of my favorite games of the year did not get any awards. I also disliked that episode on Ludonarative Disonance simply because it was not my own issues, nor what I think the majority of the people that don't like Infinite were really thinking of as a problem in the game.
Otherwise I simply have to agree. If it brings people joy then its nice. Games are subjective. Only real rule I have is to NEVER even use words/phrases that may sound absolute or in any way condescending when comparing/talkig about a game;s quality. In other words for example one of the sentences in the last paragraph here:
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/13/metro-last-light-review
It should not have been written like that. Too adamant on something extremely subjective. When thrown into the volatile internet... also the way it comes off is... kinda not good really... It also indirectly led to flamewars.
Not liking the ending of a game isn't pathetic. It's a completely valid complaint for any game but in the case of ME3 it wasn't that the ending was bad but rather felt inadequate given the investment a lot of people had in the game from building a character through 3 games and feeling like every choice mattered and every loss a tragedy to have it all boiled down to a single choice at the end without seeing the consequences is understandably frustrating. It does not justify being a poisonous social jerk to people but not being satisfied is perfectly reasonable.xNicolex said:What exactly was rushed about ME3? There was nothing rubbished about ME3 at all, people were just upset that they didn't like the ending, which was pathetic really.ex275w said:Rushed games like Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3.
This is actually a good point. I often look at reviews of games before buying them and have bought games reviewers recommend before. Videogames are not cheap and I certainly wouldn't want to hear an apologetic, airy-fairy "it's just my subjective opinion, man!", after spending money, from someone being paid to spout off about videogames...loa said:Are you serious?
Are you seriously oblivious about all the sleazy business going on behind the scenes of game reviews?
Do you really not understand why people who bought DA2 based on the perfect score, opened the box and out fell a turd would be mad at the reviewer?
Would you as a consumer trust a single fucking review on IGN?
Do you really think game journalists don't have an obligation to consumers?
Oh wait, do you actually believe this is just about "random people on the internet liking something"?
Are you this naive or are you just balls deep in the swamp yourself?
Weak jim.
Very weak.