Well they can buy shares and have a vote in the company, as well as the ability to speak at shareholder gatherings, but that would be a far more expensive barrier to entry than a petition and letter writing campaign.Stall said:You don't agree with it... that's great. That's all you can do.
Could also decline to buy their other games.jmarquiso said:Well they can buy shares and have a vote in the company, as well as the ability to speak at shareholder gatherings, but that would be a far more expensive barrier to entry than a petition and letter writing campaign.Stall said:You don't agree with it... that's great. That's all you can do.
You're right, you could do that. If it's an organized boycott, which I don't think it would be. Further, by taking yourself out of their customer base, you give them less reason to care what you say.dbenoy said:Could also decline to buy their other games.jmarquiso said:Well they can buy shares and have a vote in the company, as well as the ability to speak at shareholder gatherings, but that would be a far more expensive barrier to entry than a petition and letter writing campaign.Stall said:You don't agree with it... that's great. That's all you can do.
I have to say it looks like an image from Reddit or something, not original research.wildcard9 said:source for that sales chart he used?
That's a good ideajmarquiso said:You're right, you could do that. If it's an organized boycott, which I don't think it would be. Further, by taking yourself out of their customer base, you give them less reason to care what you say.
Most public corporations allow the right for shareholders who hold even a single share the right to speak at open meetings. If you explain it as a business and profitability standpoint, with research to back it up, shareholders (who only care about profitability, not fan service) may make the same demands.
Either way it's an uphill battle.