Jimquisition: Sony, Nintendo, EA and SOPA

TheDooD

New member
Dec 23, 2010
812
0
0
Johnson McGee said:
I don't understand why the American government would even consider letting this pants-on-head retarded bill pass. At the same time, where is the legislation that protects OUR privacy? Just today I had the Shazam app ask me 5 times back to back for access to my personal information. Pissed me off so much I uninstalled it right there.

Not to mention that the instant a law like this passes every server farm and web based business that could be affected will instantly move offshore to avoid the law and access to foreign websites from within the US will be severely restricted by ISPs fearing lawsuits. America's economy will take a huge hit from this if it passes and it will affect everyone else. I encourage any American citizens on this board to write your congress-person on this issue.
The reason why the government is trying some shit like this because of the lobbyist in DC putting money and ideas into their heads. They want something done so they'll bribe until it's heard by the majority. It overall undermines the voting processes the majority, the USERS don't get a vote at all. The vote goes to idiots that are too busy counting their money to really care.
 

Raso719

New member
May 7, 2011
87
0
0
Sadly I don't see this bill hurting bigger game companies all that much. So long as you're a sniveling little sycophant and praise every game you review with a generous 10 out of 10 and never speak ill of them then I'd surmise your website would be left unharmed (so long as a rival company doesn't get too pissed you're talking about a different game that is).

I would suspect that this would harm smaller devs who would have many larger companies shut down websites who are "violating" the IP rights of smaller companies that can't afford to police the internet as thoroughly as the larger ones can and so all of these smaller companies who do rely on word of mouth to get their games out their would be screwed.

Speak ill of Bioware? Deleted.
Speak ill of modern FPSs and their trends? Deleted.
Cry out for more meaningful and intelligent Sci-fi movies? Deleted.
Post an article about a game or movie from a smaller developer or director that could threaten to topple status quo? Deleted.

And sad thing is I can already see many fans of more mainstream games lining up with big "so what?" attitudes. I mean these are people who've probably had their tastes dictated to them from day one, so they don't care if games like Amnesia or Mine Craft can no longer compete with their Call of Duties and Battlefields. And since this IS America if we hear less and less about JRPGs and other Japanese games as companies like EA and Activision submit deletion after deletion for every article that speak well about them (on the altruistic behalf of their smaller Japanese competitors of course) then who would really shed a tear? After all JRPGs suck, it's like a fact, or something, so why should these people be allowed to share their opinions when they are clearly wrong? Go play Mass Effect and Call of Duty and never speak ill of them or else.

Big brother is watching.
 

sgtwisky

New member
Apr 3, 2010
10
0
0
WOW... this is the first I've heard of this. really glad you did this vid. Now to figure out how I can help stop this... TO THE INTERNET !!!!
 

maxmanrules

New member
Mar 30, 2011
235
0
0
Volf99 said:
maxmanrules said:
Volf99 said:
Versuvius said:
I'm just wondering. If this passes and everyone who hosts themselves in the US, hop country and host their servers elsewhere, how long it will take the US to flop its dick around and extend its big floppy juridstriction to other countries? And how long it will take them to be told to fuck right off.
well if you really wanted to go somewhere that doesn't give a f*ck about intellectual property rights, you could go to mainland China, lol. Seriously I don't think you would have any trouble over there as long as none of your videos say anything bad about the CCP.
Yes, except China is a horrible place to live. China censors the net anyway, but yeah, they probably encourage piracy, and god knows we've seen enough state-sponsored cyberattacks directed at everything from google to the pentagon.
I was under the impression that Hong Kong is a nice place to live and given their history, I think it might be some what "free" of the CCP's rules.
Interestingly enough, Hong Kong is technically not Chinese. When the British handed it over to China it was stipulated it remain independent (sort of anyway) and that they have their own laws, parliament and money. It's also separated from mainland China (which is what the poster was talking about)
 

maxmanrules

New member
Mar 30, 2011
235
0
0
Therumancer said:
maxmanrules said:
[First up, excellent essay dude, but your last point really seems to emphasise that we need to make proper fair use laws that regard things such as this. Though, if we did, hey would be fucked up by the large companies with lots of money *sigh*
Well, we need to change the laws in regards to purely intellectual properties to include more consumer protection. Right now the entire problem is that games exist in a sort of limbo where you are basically giving them money for the right to use something (a liscence) which they can revoke for any reason while keeping your money.

The reason why the laws were written that way was to prevent someone from buying a game and then saying they owned the entire game, and the people who made it can't sell it anymore because it's no theirs and there should only be one working version of it anywhere (theirs) because it was the product they bought.

Really the entire style of law was not conceived to begin with, with thigns like video games or the internet, or digital distribution in mind. Nor was anyone expecting it to be so heavily exploited by people playing games with contract law through EULAs or companies wanting to basically demand customers waive any and all reasonable protections in order to use their product.

I doubt it will happen in the near future, especially seeing as a lot of companies that like to play god would be "hurt", but the goverment DOES need to step in and create laws governing liscences and virtual properties that protect the consumer and actually give them ownership/full rights over, at least a single copy of a game. Then you can work from there.

I've also been of the opinion that things like MMOs and services that provide virtual goods should legally be required to be backed by a trust. That is to say a pile of money sufficient to pay for continued operations indefinatly through interest... sort of like what rich, irresponsible, kids get from their parents, where they can only withdraw so much money from the pile at one time based on how much it makes so they effectively have an inexhaustible pile of cash. Someone who invests a ton of money in say "league of legends" and then sees it go down loses all of their virtual property at that point, thus I feel to operate something like that a company should be required to ensure it's indefinate existance through having a trust sufficient to maintain servers and office space and an employee or two from now until well... the sun goes cold... it can actually be done. This would effectively make virtual property something fairly "real" which it should be if people are accepting money for it. Of course in reality I imagine this would just cause the collapse of virtual cash shops and the increasingly ridiculous "free to play" model.

I could say more on it, but it's increasingly irrelevent to reality. The bottom line is the current system sucks, I think a fair one could be created if anyone wanted to take the time. I suspect this kind of thing is probably going to be a hot button issue in years to come. As time goes on I imagine we might very well see politicians running on a platform of reforming virtual trade and working on creating such a system though.
Yeah, I mean look at what happened to Star Trek online, which has completely bombed out and gotten totally screwed. New Zealand is slightly better than America about this stuff, and so are lots of European countries, which don't seem to like the fact that companies can sell something broken and then force the user to waive their rights BEFORE they can tell whether it is broken or not. The problem is most anyone in government has no real idea about copyright or IP, not in a sense related to internet, in fact many profess their ignorance when voting about such topis (but they vote anyway, and make the stupid vote. Retards) And so they really don't care about such things, cause they do not affect them awfully. Most gamers are fairly young, a large proportion being under voting age, which blocks off their views(not saying EVERYONE is, but a fair few) and it may take many years before balance is achieved, but some retarded version of SOPA or Protect IP is going to be passed before that by people who don't know and are only informed by those with big pockets.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,503
0
0
maxmanrules said:
Volf99 said:
maxmanrules said:
Volf99 said:
Versuvius said:
I'm just wondering. If this passes and everyone who hosts themselves in the US, hop country and host their servers elsewhere, how long it will take the US to flop its dick around and extend its big floppy juridstriction to other countries? And how long it will take them to be told to fuck right off.
well if you really wanted to go somewhere that doesn't give a f*ck about intellectual property rights, you could go to mainland China, lol. Seriously I don't think you would have any trouble over there as long as none of your videos say anything bad about the CCP.
Yes, except China is a horrible place to live. China censors the net anyway, but yeah, they probably encourage piracy, and god knows we've seen enough state-sponsored cyberattacks directed at everything from google to the pentagon.
I was under the impression that Hong Kong is a nice place to live and given their history, I think it might be some what "free" of the CCP's rules.
Interestingly enough, Hong Kong is technically not Chinese. When the British handed it over to China it was stipulated it remain independent (sort of anyway) and that they have their own laws, parliament and money. It's also separated from mainland China (which is what the poster was talking about)
that maybe true but I don't think that they are aloud to criticize the CCP.
 

Bluecho

New member
Dec 30, 2010
171
0
0
Hmm...I'm torn. On the one hand, Obama is filthy commie scum...but on the other hand he promised to veto the bill. I just don't know what to think. -_-

What I do know is that if there's anything I despise as much as a corrupt government, it's a business that gets in bed with the corrupt government to gain an unfair advantage in the market.

Really, this bill cannot stand. What the entertainment industry profits from is the ability to supply product in the face of scarcity. Scarcity they enforce by making them the only place to get it. The internet has been the market's way of dissolving scarcity, and making available to everyone a market good. Why in the holy hell should we willingly support a law that promotes scarcity to the benefit of only a select few in the industry? It's not just against the free market, it's also blatently immoral.
 

Mosstromo

New member
Jul 5, 2008
227
0
0
The truly worrying thing about all this is to witness the fact that enormous corporations are being given the ability to not only police themselves (which has never worked) but to police nations.

Already in several countries (USA and Mexico-- during their elections-- to mention just a couple) corporations have participated unlawfully in the forging of political history to benefit themselves. But the scope of this is global.
That a business institution is now capable of manufacturing a law, a law without borders geographical and legal, and has enough clout to force governments (the UK for example) into implementing them relatively fast, has to give anyone a horrific glimpse of what this precedent will set in motion in generations to come. Just as that first step at the beginning of the 1900s, where they created the idea they could be "moral entities" instead of "physical entities" that has eventually placed them in a position were they are never to be responsible of their actions, this act will propel them to new levels of invulnerability and control beyond what we thought were the normal frontiers of what were basically "the merchant guild".
Specially terrible when compared with how long it takes the same countries to get their heads out of their asses and pass on laws that are actually urgent to protect the world from ecological disaster, this case is revolting.

It is also sobering to see that the internet does indeed have an owner. I think it was never really true that it was an international territory, such as Antarctica.

William Gibson's works are alarmingly close to stop being "fiction" and becoming "naturalism", sadly only in regards to the balance of power.
Write a letter, paint a sign, rally friends or take part in any movement that is trying to stop this obscenity of taking place. Anything that you can. It is really NOT JUST about games or piracy, it is about power and control without restrain.
Lets keep Gibson's novels as wonderful "cyberpunk fiction" only.
 

airrazor7

New member
Nov 8, 2010
364
0
0
garjian said:
How would this effect sites based elsewhere?
...couldnt you just move your business... somehow... if this only effects america?

im not really read up on it... ... ...lets do some research then :/
Look at it this way: All of the companies that have signed to support SOPA deal in international business and have branches of their company spread out among several countries across the globe. If this bill proves to be successful in the USA by their perception, the bill signers may be so inclined to start something similar in their own countries.
 

MonkeyPunch

New member
Feb 20, 2008
589
0
0
So I just informed myself a little about the subject.

It seems like this is something based mainly in the USA. I'm not saying it won't affect people outside of it, but it's mainly targeting the American people.

I just wonder how they can justify this law alone from the standpoint that it would surely mean that online sites and businesses that would choose not to have to deal with these laws would just open shop outside of the US. Like getting servers abroad.

Seems like a silly thing to do, just from a financial standpoint. I would think other countries would almost HOPE that this law passes in the US just for the potential revenue they could stand to make from this.
Mind, it seems like a stupid thing to do from any other standpoint too.
 

ReinWeisserRitter

New member
Nov 15, 2011
749
0
0
For those of you saying it doesn't apply to you because you don't live in the United States: it might one day if it passes. On the video game side of things alone we have a company that doesn't even originate in the US, but is nonetheless pushing for this one. It may seem unlikely that Nintendo's home country would go for such a thing in turn, but it also seems hard to believe that the US - with countless websites whose creators make their very livings off of the things this bill would be in a position to shut down but don't threaten their business, such as, well, this one - would either. The point is that it could very well concern you one day; it would hardly be the first time the rest of the world followed suit when one nation did something idiotic, and our nation loves leading the way in that particular parade.

For those of you saying "Eh, there's no way it'll pass", you're probably right, but if the idea of what bills like this are proposing is in any way unacceptable to you, it's in your best interest to speak up; it might take half an hour out of your day. And if you think to yourself "Well, it's just me; what difference would it make?", I ask you in turn, "What if one hundred thousand people who thought the exact same thing all decided to do something? What if one million people did?"

Our apathy as a nation is why crooked politicians are allowed to get even far enough to propose such a bill; we have no one to blame but ourselves when democracy dies, because it's ultimately our responsibility to uphold it. We do not work for democracy; it works with us. And when the people proposing the decisions are in the wrong, it's up to us to say so and shut it down. Doing nothing simply tells them we're content with being silenced.
 

Taunta

New member
Dec 17, 2010
484
0
0
Here's a little video about what this bill is about. I found the visual aid helpful.

http://vimeo.com/31100268

And if you want to help, go to americancensorship.org. On Tuesday they're having an "everybody call your Senators" party.

As for those who aren't US citizens, the only thing I can think of is to spread the word about it, and cross your fingers. If the bill passes in the US, then a lot of countries will likely use us as an example to follow. Not to mention lots of people in other countries whose jobs depend on the internet will have their livelihoods injured, because a large portion of their fanbase is in America.
Secondly, it puts all social network sites at risk because the website becomes responsible for its members. For example, even if you don't live in the US, you will be censored on Facebook (which is based in the US) because FB will get sued if any of its members infringe on the bill. Meaning you can't post videos containing footage from games, movies, tv shows, or copyrighted music.
Thirdly, the bill will only support big money corporations, and actually cripple small businesses, because it gives corporations the right to sue others for "not working hard enough to prevent piracy", which is so vague that it can't mean anything good.

EDIT: For what it's worth, VP Biden is against this bill. Here's some proof.

http://vimeo.com/32149733
 

Smackerlacker

New member
Jun 15, 2011
16
0
0
As horrible as it is for consumers of entertainment, the simple fact is that SOPA isn't really aimed at them.
SOPA is a desperate response to the Occupy Wall Street movement and others like it.
The corporations that control everything are scared shitless, and they recognize the strong contribution to these movements that social media and online news reporting sites offer.
SOPA is an attempt to silence online media, so that the only source of information available is the traditional media, which we all know is corrupt as hell.
Even if you do care about intellectual property rights, you need to stand up against this bill. If you don't, we'll all be living in Nazi Germany by the end of the decade.
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
First of all, thank you so much, for your part in getting Deadly Premonition noticed. I wouldn't have had it blow my mind, in good and bad ways if not for you and the others that made the effort. Games like that will seriously suffer from this retarded bill, and as a consumer, regardless of how bad I'd feel for people losing their jobs, this is what is really important. It will limit competition from smaller publishers and the most interesting products will die off. So yeah. Fuck 'em and their censoring ways.
 

hooksashands

New member
Apr 11, 2010
550
0
0
Unbelievable.

You know what? Fuck it. Go ahead, corporate lawyers. Push this bill through. Try to weed out any Fair Use. Try to censor media sites on the internet, delete Youtube videos en masse, stomp around wielding unchecked power. Give my generation the excuse it needs to bring out the torches and pitchforks. Give us the Empire vs Rebels showdown we've all been waiting for, preparing for, anticipating from day #1. Take the chance. I dare you.
 

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
931
0
0
I don't think PROTECT IP, ACTA or SOPA or any of these are going to pass anytime soon, but the fact that there are so many being put forth is a bad sign.