NewClassic said:
To me, that's more a rule of courtesy than not. I can't imagine you'd go into the house of a director and over polite dinner discuss their movies with the proviso that the only reason you watch them is because you can pirate them and get them free. By extension, the Escapist is just asking that people don't bring them up while you're here.
That analogy doesn't really hold up for me. Most directors direct movies because they love the craft of making movies, not because they want to be rich. By putting it this way, you're essentially saying that The Escapist is in it just for the advertising dollars, not for the content.
By making it a verboten topic, you're only drawing more attention to it. It's quite Orwellian, especially given the other rather provocative topics that get brought up here regularly, such as gender, sexuality, politics and business practices.
In fact, a significant part of The Escapist's content involves criticising the way game publishers make their money, often in very blunt terms. It seems rather hypocritical for The Escapist to turn around and essentially say "Oh, we can criticise other companies' business models all we like, but don't you dare even mention ours."
.
NewClassic said:
That's probably the biggest problem. Sites don't always have the freedom to dictate which ads are shown where. Most ad networks just sell ads, and then transmit them through their system rather than being vetted personally by the sites that employ them.
So, why doesn't the Escapist have this freedom? Nobody put a gun to the company's head and forced them to sign up with a particular ad network. It's not like The Escapist is a tiny, unknown site with no options (although it isn't a huge player, either). But it's a big enough site that it should have the ability to curate advertising.
Many sites both smaller and larger than The Escapist have chosen to not blindly accept advertising - so what's the reason you can't?
Edited to add:
I see that people are still getting warnings simply for
admitting to using Ad blockers, in
this thread? I mean, really. That just shows you aren't really interested in honest discussion. You think by now that people are suddenly going to start using an ad blocker because someone on this thread admits it?
This just seems really paranoid, and chilling to proper discussion. Can you tell us how far up The Escapist's management chain this authorisation of warning for people simply admitting to using ad blockers in this thread went? Who was it that approved the terms of this supposed "armistice"?