Color me ambivalent.
I get it that there have been and will be video game controversies that really warrant the "community"'s attention.
I also don't really think this is one of them. Yes, women in video games are often portrayed in ways that could be described as over-sexualized. Complaining that these same women are subject to violence, free of all context, just strikes me as silly. The women in this particular video are clearly a lethal, dangerous threat, and to what extent their sexual attractiveness isn't part of what makes them dangerous, it's so over-the-top as to be difficult to take seriously. I mean, c'mon, nuns?
I've said before that I'm extremely leery of anyone suggesting that their personal outrage gives them the right to censor things for everyone. But I also understand that while it's tempting to claim sole ownership of the right to deem things worthy of condemnation or conversation, it really doesn't work that way. And I know my personal barometer of taste isn't an effective gauge of whether others genuinely feel threatened or lessened by a particular kind of imagery.
From where I stand, I'd much prefer that if we had to have this conversation, it was about being sold sex and violence as a package the creators deemed certain to get us rats hitting the food pellet button than the idea that you're not supposed to hit girls.
Your Mileage, as ever, May Vary.