Apparently, closing off your comments section and not tolerating threats.shrekfan246 said:Obviously they had the audacity of trying to become involved with video games while female. What bigger crime can there be? Think of the cooties!
Apparently, closing off your comments section and not tolerating threats.shrekfan246 said:Obviously they had the audacity of trying to become involved with video games while female. What bigger crime can there be? Think of the cooties!
No one is blaming you for harassment, and being called stupid or dumb is not harassment. Getting all your social media accounts bombarded with sexist nonsense, getting threats against you, that is harassment. Imagine pouring a lot of your money, time, and heart into a game, and as soon as you submit it on Steam all of the comments blow up with YOU DUMB MAN YOU KNOW NOTHING GB2 WEIGHT ROOM KEEP THIS CRAP OFF OUR STEAM. And then when you ask what you did so wrong, someone says "well, I don't condone what they're saying, but why are you submitting this on Steam? Maybe you should just stay off of Steam if you can't handle the trolls."Thanatos2k said:See, but as a male gamer who does NOT harass women online, I'm also tired of getting blamed for doing it. I don't control other people's actions, by "contributing to the online ecosystem" doesn't make it my fault when stupid people do stupid things.
I get harassed online too, like for example daring to suggest that a Dynasty Warriors Zelda mashup is a horrible idea, but you don't see a news story about that every time it happens. This isn't a problem with gaming - this is a problem with *the internet.*
Bullshit on your bullshit.ccdohl said:Bullshit. I have no relation to the harassers. Gaming is a worldwide hobby now and the idea that we are a single community is absolutely nuts. I don't even consider myself a part of certain communities within the games that I play.
And have you looked at Greenlight lately? Any crappy browser game or mobile port on there gets tons of flak. No, they shouldn't have made her gender part of the criticism, but the game would have been ridiculed either way.
Except that it is tolerated. That's why it exists in very very plentiful amounts.DrOswald said:The problem with that is that we don't tolerate it. In fact, one of the big points Jim makes is that people go out of their way to attempt disown people who do this. Just because it exists doesn't mean the gaming community at large tolerates it. But the fact is that we cannot stop it. The best we can do is call out the idiots who do it.Jupiter065 said:A community is judged by the worst shit it tolerates, and as such the gamer community deserves all the scorn it gets.
Yes and that does suck. It's why I report someone who ever acts like an asshole to me online. The men don't, you know, get harassed for being men. It's kind of a different scenario.Machine Man 1992 said:Because as a male gamer, you're just expected to suck it up. And you do. We do.Thanatos2k said:See, but as a male gamer who does NOT harass women online, I'm also tired of getting blamed for doing it. I don't control other people's actions, by "contributing to the online ecosystem" doesn't make it my fault when stupid people do stupid things.
I get harassed online too, like for example daring to suggest that a Dynasty Warriors Zelda mashup is a horrible idea, but you don't see a news story about that every time it happens.
But the minute that a woman gets mean things said to her, suddenly it's a big deal. For all the flak people like Anita Sarkeesian give Damsels In Distress, she sure profited off being one.
And this Depression Quest chick is going to be rolling in Benjamins from this.
I'll close with saying, "what is more sexist, the trolls who exploit chinks in the armor, or the press who focus on her being a woman who was insulted online?"
(Fer Christ's sake, if you're getting threatening phone calls, call the damn cops.)
Making us feel responsible is only going to give more power to those who delight in spreading misery for the sake of their own twisted humor. In the end we won't have the power over them, no, they'll still just do what they want. Instead they'll have power over us if we try and base all our actions and reactions on what they do. Hell, I think it's about at that point right now.Thanatos2k said:I don't control other people's actions, by "contributing to the online ecosystem" doesn't make it my fault when stupid people do stupid things.
It's this type of apathetic behavior which partly encourages this.Abomination said:I don't understand how it's my responsibility or problem that a minority of anonymous gasbags had a go at a woman for making "Depression Quest".
I also do not understand how I could possibly change this or contribute in any way.
"Encourages"? My inactivity is ACTIVELY promoting the opposing viewpoint?xNicolex said:It's this type of apathetic behavior which partly encourages this.Abomination said:I don't understand how it's my responsibility or problem that a minority of anonymous gasbags had a go at a woman for making "Depression Quest".
I also do not understand how I could possibly change this or contribute in any way.
erttheking said:If I changed the minds or two or three people, I'll call it a win.
glad you didn't take it the wrong wayerttheking said:You're fine.![]()
Start a thread harassing a game developer over here 4chan style and see how that goes then.xNicolex said:Except that it is tolerated.
And that's a fair point, you're not going to be able to change everyone's mind. I'm just saying that we should do what we can, when we can. And to be honest when it comes to people like that I'm not really expecting to change their minds, they're more the people who I was talking about when we should say we don't tolerate their attitudes. It's kind of why I said sexism isn't going anywhere, it's going to take awhile for it to be bred out of society. Still, doing little things here and there can help nudge it, if only a little, in that direction.Harleykin said:erttheking said:If I changed the minds or two or three people, I'll call it a win.
to be honest if it'd change peoples minds
i'll call it a win too don't get me wrong!
it's just...one lame comparison and i'll stop it ok?
do you think chauvinists will ever read up on femenist theories? i really do think those heads are closed of and if some anonymous person on the web tell's them it's wrong...i really doubt they will change. i'm afraid there isn't enough weight behind and argument (tried to translate a german figure of speech...dunno if this makes sense ha!)
glad you didn't take it the wrong wayerttheking said:You're fine.![]()
(politest forum i'ver been a part of...seriously!)
Yes, apathy or 'inactivity' as you call it does encourage nasty behaviors in this community (and in practically every single other form of medium).Abomination said:"Encourages"? My inactivity is ACTIVELY promoting the opposing viewpoint?xNicolex said:It's this type of apathetic behavior which partly encourages this.Abomination said:I don't understand how it's my responsibility or problem that a minority of anonymous gasbags had a go at a woman for making "Depression Quest".
I also do not understand how I could possibly change this or contribute in any way.
I'm sorry, but that's some "you're either with us or against us" rhetoric being spouted.
I'll be certain to subscribe to webpages and forums I never visit and post my dissent at people I've never met, about opinions I don't share to encourage people I don't know to move forward with causes I don't care about... because to do otherwise is to promote the opposing side.
Know what, I think I like the trolls more. At least they don't go out of their way to belittle and insult me for not contributing to this "battle".
No, it was not supposed to be her as the character. It was drawn a few weeks before she got the job and she specifically said that she thinks that Beck should be a woman (because we need more strong female characters in video games) and this is her take on what that would look like. In addition, it looks nothing like her (for example, different hair color and style.)ConanThe3rd said:Actually, dumb question, was that supposed to be a gender swapped Beck or just her in a Beck costume, cuz that is more akin to what probably was going on there (and is something that Japanese staff on things will do, draw themselves as characters).DrOswald said:3. Her art is bad.
I half agree with this one. I have seen a couple of her pieces of art and I really don't like her style, especially not the gender swapped Beck (the main character of Mighty NO. 9) she made. But if she can suppress her own style for what the project needs she is technically proficient and will be a fine employee.
My call on it is that she wasn't careful about what she said and that is what got her into "trouble". Replace the gender and it does nothing to solve the ur problem.
No. Social justice warrior is a term coined by the people to which it is applied. It refers to a specific group of people who self identify as social justice warriors. Now, some SJW's are just highly passionate about ending prejudice but others tend to push that into being unreasonable. For example, here are somethings that the SJW's have gotten up to lately:Zachary Amaranth said:Doesn't "social justice warrior" just mean "person who believes things that I dislike" anyway?DrOswald said:I don't think this is true. What I have seen of her posts leads me to believe that she is passionate about her views but I haven't't seen anything that leads me to believe she would do this. I think she is passionate but not unreasonable.