Lunar Shadow said:
He was referring to Buddhism specifically. I replyed under that premise seeing as I AM a Buddhist
I wasn't calling your statement into question, no matter what it looks like. I was merely injecting that fact into the discussion. "Karma" is a lot of different things to a lot of different people. Even the religions that use Karma as their social morality backbone (ie, almost all of them in one form or another) all have different interpretations of the causality of being good or bad.
People (admittedly myself included) seem to be focusing in on the idea of Karma as being a balancer in a single lifetime. Like, I steal some money, something gets taken away from me by some sort of cosmic scale. But most applications of Karma have a much broader view of things. You build up karma in your life, and then when you die, it's weighed on the scale. The measuring of the scale happens when you die, not as you live your life.
In all honesty, I think the idea of a cosmic scale is hokum (although I completely respect your right to believe that it is not). The idea that you're building up Karma to escape some horrible fate, be it hell, or another life as a snail, really does a disservice to yourself. You should build up Karma not because you'll get the reward of a nice afterlife, or in the average person's view, nice things happening to you in this life. You should want to build up Karma because it makes you feel good to help other people.
again, going off on a tangent as I often do. note that I don't know you, so I'm not actually talking about you. I'm just talking about the concept of Karma.
Nouw said:
Hmm... there goes a metric-fuckton of people right there. Hope they have fun trying to find meaning and purpose in life again, congratulations. I really hope you're trolling right now >.>
I think he's the worst kind of troll - the sincere troll.