It is their responsibility to know, although I recognize that it's not always easy. However, no one would be trying to make this rule if the kids weren't playing in the parking lot regularly. If it was a one-time thing, then it might be excusable for the parents to not know.Titan Buttons said:ok if they where being decent parents they would not let or tell there kids play in a parking lot, must of the time kids would just be told to just play outside their house but kids will follow their friends to places to play and where all the other kids play, parents don't always know that their childs run off somewhere to play with other kids
The children of the parents in question are playing in a place that is not an acceptable place for children to play. If the parents were providing an acceptable place to play, the children wouldn't be in the parking lot.Titan Buttons said:Your 1st point I completly agree with but is that what the parents in question are doing?
I don't know the area either; all the information I have comes from looking over the satellite view on Google maps. From that, I was able to spot a church about a 2-minute walk away with a lawn(and church parking lots often have long, regular periods when they go unused), and a neighborhood of houses with lawns a 10-minute walk away, across one minor street. If the parents were to get the permission of the church or the homeowners, the kids could have a safe place to play that they could walk to.Titan Buttons said:Could you please specify what types of places you are refering to, as I do not know much about the area in question.
Hmmm what you say is true but the problem I find is that the law does not just cover the parking lot it also covers several of the streets around the area which I asume are the ones outside some of the kids houses which is going too far a kid should be allowed to play in the street out side their home unless it's a major high. They should be allowed to play hand ball on the sidewalk and draw over half the street with chalk, it's a residential area drives shouldn't be speeding and naturally looking out for kids. Also said kids should scatter onto the closest sidewalk at the 1st sign of a car and leave any ball to its poping fate I know I have had too.theNater said:It is their responsibility to know, although I recognize that it's not always easy. However, no one would be trying to make this rule if the kids weren't playing in the parking lot regularly. If it was a one-time thing, then it might be excusable for the parents to not know.
I think your going a bit too far with parental blame, parents can only provide an acceptable place to play when there is one avaliable too them.theNater said:The children of the parents in question are playing in a place that is not an acceptable place for children to play. If the parents were providing an acceptable place to play, the children wouldn't be in the parking lot.
The church idea does seem like a very good option, although when a service is on the child might be forced to leave as kids like to make noise which will probably interrupt the mass. Also some churches have there parking lots fenced off as to stop people using it when a service is not on so when one does come on the lot isn't half full. I'm not sure if that is only for churches attached to school or if the parking lot in question has one I just know that some do.theNater said:I don't know the area either; all the information I have comes from looking over the satellite view on Google maps. From that, I was able to spot a church about a 2-minute walk away with a lawn(and church parking lots often have long, regular periods when they go unused), and a neighborhood of houses with lawns a 10-minute walk away, across one minor street. If the parents were to get the permission of the church or the homeowners, the kids could have a safe place to play that they could walk to.
I highly recommend looking at a map of the area. Google maps is online, free, and provides a very clear picture with its satellite mode.Titan Buttons said:Hmmm what you say is true but the problem I find is that the law does not just cover the parking lot it also covers several of the streets around the area which I asume are the ones outside some of the kids houses which is going too far a kid should be allowed to play in the street out side their home unless it's a major high. They should be allowed to play hand ball on the sidewalk and draw over half the street with chalk, it's a residential area drives shouldn't be speeding and naturally looking out for kids. Also said kids should scatter onto the closest sidewalk at the 1st sign of a car and leave any ball to its poping fate I know I have had too.
People don't suddenly become parents. Even the most clueless get a good 3 months of warning, and then there's a year or two before the kid needs room to run around. That's plenty of time to find a play space or move somewhere with one.Titan Buttons said:I think your going a bit too far with parental blame, parents can only provide an acceptable place to play when there is one avaliable too them.
All of this is something the parents would need to work out with the people who manage the building and grounds. I suspect a reasonable agreement could be made.Titan Buttons said:The church idea does seem like a very good option, although when a service is on the child might be forced to leave as kids like to make noise which will probably interrupt the mass. Also some churches have there parking lots fenced off as to stop people using it when a service is not on so when one does come on the lot isn't half full. I'm not sure if that is only for churches attached to school or if the parking lot in question has one I just know that some do.
Going door-to-door is not ideal. However, those are the sorts of houses people with children should be living in. Starting by observing which houses already have children playing in their yards, then going up with an approach of "my kids don't have a good place to play, could they come play with your kids" would probably fare better.Titan Buttons said:That seems weird too me. can you imagen someone knock at the fromt door to your house and then asking you if their kids can play on your lawn, I honestly wouldn't know how to respond. I mean it's a good idea I just doubt it will get any results. Seriously, people in gerenal will just not allow a random person's kids to just play on their lawn out of the blue like that, well you get someone nice enough to say yes but a lot of people put a fair bit of effort into maintaining a lawn and wouldn't want to risk it all going to waste. It is a brilliant idea that would have never even crossed my mind but again I doubt people would so generous to strangers.
My pleasure. I thought it was appropriate.Proton Packmule said:Oh, dear, good sir.. You have made me laugh this day. I very, very rarely laugh at these 'suitable pictures' but this one took the cookie, biscuit, and the whole damn bakery.The .50 Caliber Cow said:Irridium said:Banning tag? Tag, the game EVERY, SINGLE, CHILD, plays at one point in their lives? Really?
I have no words.
OT: I'm against it, but I'm also against McDonalds preaching to kids about getting more exercise. Like having a trained assassin telling you to drink milk, so you can have strong bones.. For when he breaks your neck.
Choose one or choose the other, fat, lazy kids with no self-esteem, or thinner, healthier kids with a few bumped knees and scraped elbows. A little accidental rough-housing never did more harm than the exercise did good.
Well I've always been terrible with google maps so I'm not sure if I'm looking at the correct area in Florida since the point on the map I'm looking at is in the middle of a highwaytheNater said:I highly recommend looking at a map of the area. Google maps is online, free, and provides a very clear picture with its satellite mode.
No offece but that's a very optimistic view of the world if you believe everyone has the ability to move in the event that they find out they are going to be parentstheNater said:People don't suddenly become parents. Even the most clueless get a good 3 months of warning, and then there's a year or two before the kid needs room to run around. That's plenty of time to find a play space or move somewhere with one.
AgreedtheNater said:All of this is something the parents would need to work out with the people who manage the building and grounds. I suspect a reasonable agreement could be made.
You raise a fair point and it would probably fare better with such an approach, but I doubt it will yeild the optimal result needed for how many kids would there must be. After all you don't make a such a law because 2 kids are messing up.theNater said:Going door-to-door is not ideal. However, those are the sorts of houses people with children should be living in. Starting by observing which houses already have children playing in their yards, then going up with an approach of "my kids don't have a good place to play, could they come play with your kids" would probably fare better.
Edited for grammar.
apart from many people on this site...i think this place is the last safe haven for the smarter person... xDBooze Zombie said:People are stupid.
The only game i'm opposed to playing outside is Hide and Seek. Its the only game I find unsafe after one of the kids I used 2 babysit went missing because she'd wandered off into the next street (even after being told to stay in our street). Had all of us worried.The .50 Caliber Cow said:http://www.clickorlando.com/family/27381829/detail.html
O.O
Honestly, I'm disgusted with how obsessed parents are with kid safety these days. This isn't the only place I've heard of where parents are limiting kids from having fun. On the radio the other day I heard a dad who was describing a school that sent out a letter to all parents because two kids were arm wrestling. Not violent fighting or anything, just who can wrestle their opponent's arm down. I also heard about a summer camp for kids where they've banned ball tag.
Ugh.
So, do you people have opinions on how kids are overprotected these days? Oh sure, supervision is important depending on how long you leave kids out to play but they need to learn to fend for themselves.
Your thoughts Escapist?
apart from many people on this site...i think this place is the last safe haven for the smarter person... xDBooze Zombie said:People are stupid.
That was ok, but I have a better one...The .50 Caliber Cow said:Irridium said:Banning tag? Tag, the game EVERY, SINGLE, CHILD, plays at one point in their lives? Really?
I have no words.
Is the highway N Ridgewood Ave? If so, you probably just need to zoom in. That's one things I find interesting: Persimmon Place Condo, which is the region this affects, is so small it barely shows up on a map of Persimmon Place Condo.Titan Buttons said:Well I've always been terrible with google maps so I'm not sure if I'm looking at the correct area in Florida since the point on the map I'm looking at is in the middle of a highway
First, some of these people are moving to this neighborhood, despite already being parents. If they're moving to these condos, they clearly have the ability to move.Titan Buttons said:No offece but that's a very optimistic view of the world if you believe everyone has the ability to move in the event that they find out they are going to be parents
There's almost as many houses up there as condos affected by this rule. The kids from those houses are likely to be playing together already(and sharing lawn space); mixing in the kids from the condos won't overload the area.Titan Buttons said:You raise a fair point and it would probably fare better with such an approach, but I doubt it will yeild the optimal result needed for how many kids would there must be. After all you don't make a such a law because 2 kids are messing up.
Thank you, that was very helpful. OK now I'm really confused as to which parking lot the law is covering an also why the kids just don't go and play in the woods or the mostly open area behind the condos.theNater said:Is the highway N Ridgewood Ave? If so, you probably just need to zoom in. That's one things I find interesting: Persimmon Place Condo, which is the region this affects, is so small it barely shows up on a map of Persimmon Place Condo.
Good point but looking at the map that area looks like a great place to raise kids, there are near by open areas which I don't understadn why the kids aren't playing in, also the cul-de-sac driveway is a very safe place for kids to travel across when walking to the store or something.theNater said:First, some of these people are moving to this neighborhood, despite already being parents. If they're moving to these condos, they clearly have the ability to move.
Second, they don't have to move. They have to do one of the following:
1)Move
2)Construct(with help from other parents in the neighborhood) an acceptable play area nearby
3)Schedule time to take their kids to an acceptable play area(possibly taking turns with other parents)
4)Arrange an acceptable play area(as with the church or nearby homes with yards)
5)Resolve themselves to the fact that their kids won't have an acceptable play area
They get to choose which, but these parents have chosen none of these. They have instead decided to declare the parking lot an acceptable play area. That is not okay.
True, that would in all likelihood work out, the parents would just need to workout intorductions. Again, I never saw this idea as bad it just seemed so out of the ordinary for me.theNater said:There's almost as many houses up there as condos affected by this rule. The kids from those houses are likely to be playing together already(and sharing lawn space); mixing in the kids from the condos won't overload the area.