Lauren Admire said:
Kids Who Watch R-Rated Movies More Likely to Start Drinking
Researchers at Dartmouth Medical School surveyed 2,400 children around the ages 10 to 12 on the amount of R-rated movies they were allowed to watch. The group was re-surveyed two years later, and the results appear to show a link between R-rated movies and underage drinking.
About 3 percent of children who stated they had "never" seen an R-rated flick began drinking,while 19 percent of "occasional" R-rated movie-goers and 25 percent of "frequent" watchers began drinking.
Permalink
This is an interesting trend were going through, blaming or mistakes on something or someone else.
First it was the site of Boobs to an underage child can cause something, and then people who play violent videogames are more prone to be violent, and now Kids Who Watch R-Rated Movies More Likely to Start Drinking.
It?s not like parents have anything to do with the child?s upbringing or anything like that.
?The bottom line, according to the researcher, is that
parents should restrict their kids from seeing R-rated films. But he also pointed out that PG-13 movies, as well as many TV shows, often portray drinking and other adult situations -- and that supports limiting children's media time in general.?
According to this quote from the article, I guess parents are a factor in a child?s upbringing after all, I wonder if they did any research on their test subjects other than how much R-Rated-Movies they watched.
Also if you do the math, 3%+19%+25%=47% ( ?3 percent of children who stated they had "never" seen an R-rated flick began drinking, 19 percent of "occasional" R-rated movie-goers and 25 percent of "frequent" watchers began drinking.) ?That?s not much to prove you point that 2,400 children around the ages 12 to 14 were More Likely to Start Drinking becuse of R-rated movie.
(2,400 children around the ages 10 to 12+ The group was re-surveyed two years later)
And that?s without all the factors that could have happened in that two years before they were re-surveyed.
Note: To be spicific The article says it was In a study of nearly 3,600 so it might not be 2,400 excactly.Lastly, it was 13 to 26 months after the initial survey that the subjects were questioned