Killzone 2 Review

Recommended Videos

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
Killzone 2 has had a lot of hype, which is odd considering the first one wasn't actually that good. Yes, the plot was neat, but the execution of the game was poor. How exactly Killzone 2 was made the next flagship title of the PS3 I'll never know, but here's a review for it.

Plot Summary:
You play as a Space Marine (but not a genetically engineered Super-Human one) named 'Sev'. You are part of the first wave of an invasion force to claim the world of Helghan, home of the Helghast.

Your superiors say it should be a cakewalk, so you can guarantee a botch from day one. And it does botch; over and over again. The whole operation fucks up, and... that's about it.

Unfortunately, I can't really say much else. Partly because I don't want to spoil any of the big events (which are truly awesome), but also because there literally is nothing else to this game; you're fighting a campaign that fucks up at every turn.

Don't get me wrong, the story is very enjoyable indeed... it's just not overly complex. So long as you don't go into it expecting Half Life 2 level of writing, or the Helghast to turn out to be space zombies from another dimension, you'll be alright.

Game Mechanics:
I am truly loathed to use a phrase like "the game mechanics are perfect", because they aren't. In particular, the game seems to be choosy about whether or not you're allowed to shoot the guy whose face occupies the centre of your sniper scope. It seems that the game uses a realistic mechanic whereby your shot comes from below your reticule, not out of it. This is indeed more realistic, but it does piss you off when you really, really need to snipe the guy with the RPG.

That said, everything else works nicely. The game moves smoothly, the controls are responsive and everything is polished to perfection. It all handles very nicely indeed.

Special mention has to go to the interactive environments. You'll be surprised at how much you can blow up, smash or dent. Plastic bottles, for example, squish when you hit them.

Killzone 2 has also chosen to make use of the Sixaxis capabilities of the PS3. This is primarily used for two tasks; opening valves and planting demo charges. It's a nice little feature, and whilst I'd probably have preferred them not to include it (it just wastes time), it doesn't really feel forced or disruptive to play.

The Sixaxis also has another function; sniping. When sniping, moving your controller throws your aim off, so you've got to keep it very still. However, I found that by very carefully tilting the controller, I could perform extremely fine adjustments to my shot; perfect when sniping a machine gun nest. In the hands of an experienced sniper, I can see this being very, very useful indeed.

Graphics:
God like. From start to finish, it is a visual masterpiece.

AI:
Killzone 2 has managed to make the enemy AI very good, but your allies total arseholes.

Friendly AI will do everything in their power to make things harder for you. They get in your way, they block vital corridors, they stop you using the cover you need and then they expect you to revive them when they get shot.

The epitome of this is Rico. Rico is a fucktard. He's the big angry black guy of the group, and he pissed the hell out of me from the word go. He is a total dipshit, his dialogue is idiotic, and he takes every opportunity in both gameplay and FMV sequences to cluster-fuck everything he can. He is the poster child for racial purging, and I despise him more than any other character... even the boss that took 27 lives to defeat.

Thankfully, the AI on the Helghast side is much better. Their script is excellent, ranging from overheard snippits of talk between squaddies to the battle-chatter as they fight.
They make excellent use of cover, they use grenades well (but not so often that it'll piss you off), and best of all they don't all magically shoot at you and only you, despite there being two dozen other, closer targets to go for; this was a major failing of Resistance 2, but not so in Killzone 2.

Weaponry:
Killzone 2 handles weaponry a little different to most. You have two weapons, as usual, but you can only ever swap out your Primary weapon. Your secondary is always an infinite-ammo pistol. The Magnum is, thankfully, a useful weapon to have on hand, and it's pretty accurate for sniping too.

The main weapons are mostly machine guns of varying levels of power, accuracy and ammo capacity. There's a shotgun, naturally, a bolt-action rifle that's sort of good for sniping, the Sniper Rifle, the Grenade Launcher, the Missile Launcher, the Flamethrower (really fun) and the Lightning Gun (insanely fun). All the weapons have their own uses, with your default rifle making up for lack of power with accuracy. However, you'll probably just use whatever weapon the Helghast have, as that'll be the one you'll find all the ammo for.

The only complaint I have with the weapons is the Lightning Gun wasn't around half as much as it should have been; it's such a bloody fun weapon!

Multiplayer:
Killzone 2's Multiplayer looks sound in theory. I say 'in theory' because I've only played a few games, so I'm not going to say one way or the other. However, so far I'm finding it a touch unforgiving; maybe I'm just not used to it, but I seem to get slaughtered every time I go into a gunfight. The respawn time feels just a second too long, and it uses a 'base' system that leaves you respawning five minutes away from the action. As I say, I probably just need to give it more time.

Skirmish Mode:
This is Online Multiplayer for one. You can add up to 15 Bots, and play against them in any Multiplayer map, and doing any Multiplayer mission. Perfect for those who want to rack up some combat experience without humiliating themselves online... or for those who just hate social interaction.

Since I've always felt any FPS without Bots is fundamentally flawed, I'm really happy to see this.

The Really Big Fuck-Up Of Killzone 2:
It has to be said, Killzone 2 is really, really flawed in one critical area, and that is...

The ending. Sergeant 'I'm a fucking retard' Rico blows away the leader of the Helghast, thus destroying any hope of retaining order on the planet. Then, as Sev walks away despairing at the fact Rico's parents never drowned him in the bathtub, a massive Helghast fleet shows up.

Then it ends. That's it. Fucking huge cliffhanger and a Game Over screen when we should have been halfway in at best. The game is just too damn short! I beat it in around seven hours, and that includes dabbling in the multiplayer and stopping twice for meals. That leaves... four and a half to five hours in the Campaign mode.

The game doesn't just feel rushed, it feels unfinished! Sev was developing into a real, believable character, Rico was about to be shot (that's how it played out in my head), and there was going to be an even more epic battle than the one we just had. Killzone 2's description on the back of the box promises "a level of hostility no soldier has faced before," but the game ends just before that kicks in.

Summary:
For the reasons given in the spoiler, I find it hard to give an overall review for Killzone 2. Mechanically, it is probably the best FPS out there. It often feels like it's trying to be Gears of War, and the similarities in some places are frightening, but it manages to deliver an excellent gaming experience. For players who froth at the mouth and scream for GRIT and REALISM, the game is probably exactly what you're looking for.

However, a part of me thinks that someone at Sony went down to Guerilla Games and said "This is getting released before March 2009 whether it's finished or not!". The result is predictable; an unfinished game. It's not that there are blatant flaws, or horrific bugs, or a Multiplayer that feels 'tacked on' just as the game was going into production... it just feels like the game ends too soon.

If you're a die-hard Killzone fan, you'll probably love it regardless.

If you want a solid, team-based bloodbath of a Multiplayer game, it's perfect for you.

If you have no god-damn clue who the Helghast are, or what they're about, you can still pick it up.

Rating:
If the story isn't important, and gameplay is all that matters to you, you should have pre-ordered this game. In fact, you shouldn't have read this review; you should have been playing Killzone 2. Bad gamer, bad!

If you're a graphics whore, this game needs to be in your collection. You'll probably want to build a small monument to it, and worship it from time to time.

If story is everything to you, rent it. It will thrill you, it will wow you, it will suck you in... then it will fuck you and leave you in the gutter. Killzone 2's single player mode knocks you up then ditches you when it finds you're pregnant; it's the douchebag jock of the gaming world.

For everyone else... buy it. If you see yourself as a 'casual' gamer, or an 'average' gamer, or whatever tag you want to use, Killzone 2 won't be out of place in your game collection.

Oh, and when I've given the Multiplayer a proper go, I'll tell you all how it is.
 

RAKais

New member
Jan 14, 2009
280
0
0
Wow, Wargamer, I'm quite impressed.

After our Halo vs Killzone arguement a little while back I was expecting some major ass kissing of the game but its actually a very detailed review with good points and you pick out all the flaws.

Top effort.

I really want to write a review but I wouldn't know how to lay it out.
 

Inverse Skies

New member
Feb 3, 2009
3,630
0
0
RAKais said:
Wow, Wargamer, I'm quite impressed.

After our Halo vs Killzone arguement a little while back I was expecting some major ass kissing of the game but its actually a very detailed review with good points and you pick out all the flaws.

Top effort.

I really want to write a review but I wouldn't know how to lay it out.
Actually I was expecting a more biased review as well. To that I commend you for actually pointing out the flaws in the game.

Also, I read the spoiler (plot never seemed like an important thing in an FPS for me with the exception of Half-Life) and that does like an incredibly cheap way of ensuring that a sequel will be made/bought by the public. That ending is a harsh slap in the face of the consumer and basically forces them to buy another game for the simple reason of seeing what happens next in a part of the story that should have been part of the main game.
 

[Gavo]

New member
Jun 29, 2008
1,675
0
0
Good review. Broke up text nice, maybe next time try to add 1 or 2 screenshots.

Question: In single-player, is the knife still a one-hit kill?
 

gmer412

New member
Feb 21, 2008
754
0
0
Very nice review. Aside from the Halo-2-syndrome plot, it sounds like I'd want it if I had a PS3. Not enough to convince me to buy one, but it sounds like a good game.
 

Vlane

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,996
0
0
I haven't read the whole review because I've already finished the game and it wouldn't help.

I do need to say that the enemy AI is sometimes really off. At one point I threw a grenade at three Higs and they just stood there doing nothing.

Also it's a very slow progressing game. There are endlessly respawning enemies but many good FPS's have that (Half-Life 2 for example). This can be annoying because you will die pretty fast in the later levels when 5 Higs are shooting at you.

It's a good game. I would rent it now because I don't really care about the online mode.

Edit:
There are a lot of bad endings in recent times.
 

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
Yeah, I've noticed the trend on game endings. So has the latest Zero Punctuation as well.

The Multiplayer is shaping up to be very fun. Not the most fast-paced multiplayer I've ever played, but you get the impression that victory goes to the most skilled player, not the bouncing spaz.

However, the damn thing has a major issue with ammo; assuming you can survive your first two gunfights, you'll die in the third because you are now out of bullets.
 

vamp rocks

New member
Aug 27, 2008
990
0
0
damn you! lol you hyped up the spoiler.... i just had to click it... lol... anyway that was a nice review, well structured, unbiased... good job
 

scnj

New member
Nov 10, 2008
3,088
0
0
I managed to avoid reading the spoiler. I'm only up to chapter 3 so far, and the only part I disagree on is the allied AI. They haven't caused any trouble for me yet.
 

Frank_Sinatra_

Digs Giant Robots
Dec 30, 2008
2,306
0
0
Dude really nice review. I find one flaw with it though... I thought the flamethrower (visually) was an epic FAIL.

[Gavo said:
]Good review. Broke up text nice, maybe next time try to add 1 or 2 screenshots.

Question: In single-player, is the knife still a one-hit kill?
On some enemies yes others maybe 2 no more than 3.
 

Jarc42

New member
Feb 26, 2009
264
0
0
Did they fix the 'run around with a knife is invincible tactic' thing? I saw a video of that on Gamesradar.
 

Brett Alex

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,397
0
0
Just a quick question, about the weapons. Does everything still have a secondary fire? (In particular the Helghast standard rifle with its underslung shotgun, saved me so many times in Killzone 1)

I ask because it didn't seem so in the demo, but then the ISA rifle didn't have its grenades in the demo.
 

Corpse XxX

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,632
0
0
I agree with many of your points..

That Rico is retardedly annoying, and friendly npc's always block doors and hallways..
I also think i used 3000 lives to defeat the boss, also that a-tac on the roof really took the piss out of me.. About 2793 lives lost there i think. Almost a controller lost too..

I played it on normal difficulty, am for sure not gonna bother try it on a harder difficulty..

Also when fighting the end boss Radec, when eliminated all the other enemies, stand in a corner with a shotgun, he will come to you..
 

Corpse XxX

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,632
0
0
Armitage Shanks said:
Just a quick question, about the weapons. Does everything still have a secondary fire? (In particular the Helghast standard rifle with its underslung shotgun, saved me so many times in Killzone 1)

I ask because it didn't seem so in the demo, but then the ISA rifle didn't have its grenades in the demo.


Nope.. No secondary fire at all..
 

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
The lack of secondary fire was disappointing to me, particularly as I'm a really big Resistance fan and secondary fire in that is a life-saver. That said, it doesn't really spoil the game for me without a secondary fire option.
 

JaguarWong

New member
Jun 5, 2008
427
0
0
Just another dude congratulating a balanced review.

Having said that, the graphics in KZ2 are a 'technical' masterpiece rather than a visual one.

The character, vehicle and environmental design are somewhat lacking - no matter how impressively rendered they are.
There are Playstation games that better deserve the title of 'Visual Masterpiece' than KZ2.
 

jimduckie

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,218
0
0
the game is awsome the last level was hard even on easy but i get the feeling there might be a killzone 3 cause this series could support it but no more after that the one thing that kinda ticked me off was your buddies get hit ,you got to save them or they just whine but they don't save your ass