you can disconnect from the servers in the pause menu, and don't have to do any multiplayer stuff.Colt47 said:So basically, they decided to include a "feature" that allows multiplayer antics to effect single player and didn't think about the fact some people would prefer just to play the single player mode without outside interference?
And there you run into the biggest issue with any attempt to get change in the industry. It's okay when someone we like does it.Fulbert said:Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Dark Souls the first major title to do this? Not to try and racket you out of your money but to ruin your single-player experience with mandatory multiplayer functionality, whether you want it or not?
And something paid games have done for years, as well. And people said it wasn't a problem then, too. So at least they're being consistent.Scrythe said:For everyone who says "Just stick to single player then", you have to understand that they specifically designed the game to be incredibly obtuse and grind-y to purposely test your patience and make you more susceptible to forking over "just a few dollars" to make the game less aggravating. This is the same thing free-to-play mobile games have been doing for years.
Yeah, I was about to say that. Can't you literally just turn the online component off? And then you can't get raided?Bindal said:Well, the free version would be to just not go online at all. Bam. Done.
I mean, why should I pay for playing offline when I can just... go offline straight up?
If anything playing MGS5 offline is basically entirely positive for me.CaptainMarvelous said:Yeah, but in both cases you can just play offline... I mean... that's what I've been doing.Fulbert said:Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Dark Souls the first major title to do this? Not to try and racket you out of your money but to ruin your single-player experience with mandatory multiplayer functionality, whether you want it or not?
Seems cheaper than insuring my digital shit.
Welp. That does it then. I didn't know about any of this multiplayer garbage until just now. What was a must buy this holiday season for myself just became a must avoid. So bummed. #FuckonamiScrythe said:For everyone who says "Just stick to single player then", you have to understand that they specifically designed the game to be incredibly obtuse and grind-y to purposely test your patience and make you more susceptible to forking over "just a few dollars" to make the game less aggravating. This is the same thing free-to-play mobile games have been doing for years.
While I've managed to complete games like CSR Racing without paying a single cent, not everyone has that level of patience. Constructing FOB's exponentially increases resource gains in single playr, but you absolutely have to buy MB Coins on order to build more than one. They also allow you to send more combat units out on missions. Again, in single player.
Even if one were to ignore the online component completely, it doesn't change the fact that they fundamentally changed some aspect of the single player experience to accommodate their nickel-and-dime scheme. Otherwise, you can just replay Mission 8 and Mission 9 for hours until you hit the resource cap, and then have to do it all over again when after upgrading.
Hell, they even made the maximum amount of GMP low enough to make you have to grind more for really expensive stuff. Without the cap, you could just farm GMP for a single day and be set for the rest of completion, but when you're capped at $5 million, you have to go back to farming often.
But going back to FOB's for a second: even if you're not playing, any FOB's you construct are still "online" to their servers, so anyone can attack them at any time even when you're not playing. So if you want to build your one free FOB, you still have to connect to their servers to collect the rewards/losses. You can't just build one and let it farm resources for you.
This was an absolutely absurd addition to an otherwise excellent game, and it's a real shame Konami is going so far to screw over their customers this way, and this is on top of cutting the ending out of the game, and their upcoming cosmetic DLC (The Tuxedo, goddamn Horse Armor, EVA outfit for Quiet, and probably more to come). I'm genuinely surprised they haven't tried putting the bandanna and stealth camo behind a paywall.
At what point does something become abandonware?Fox12 said:It's like if a company owned Citizen Kane, but refused to ever make new physical or digital copies for copyright reasons. They're holding an important part of our gaming heritage hostage, and since they're doing fine financially, we don't even have the hope of seeing their IP's get bought out by other companies.
I'm not sure how it works in Japan, but in America it's absurdly long, because Disney throws a fit every time Steam Boat Willy is about to enter the public domain. Historically, though, when the rights of a corporation come into conflict with the cultural heritage of the people, the corporation always wins. Konami could essentially hold onto this forever, if they so desired.WouldYouKindly said:At what point does something become abandonware?Fox12 said:It's like if a company owned Citizen Kane, but refused to ever make new physical or digital copies for copyright reasons. They're holding an important part of our gaming heritage hostage, and since they're doing fine financially, we don't even have the hope of seeing their IP's get bought out by other companies.
I'm not stupid enough to advocate piracy but it shouldn't be the only way to get your hands on an old game.
CaptainMarvelous said:Yeah, but in both cases you can just play offline... I mean... that's what I've been doing.
Seems cheaper than insuring my digital shit.
Bindal said:Well, the free version would be to just not go online at all. Bam. Done.
I mean, why should I pay for playing offline when I can just... go offline straight up?
martyrdrebel27 said:you can disconnect from the servers in the pause menu, and don't have to do any multiplayer stuff.Colt47 said:So basically, they decided to include a "feature" that allows multiplayer antics to effect single player and didn't think about the fact some people would prefer just to play the single player mode without outside interference?
To all of the above: no, there's no way to dodge being raided. Even when you're offline, your FOBs can and will still be raided, and whatever you lost will be subtracted from your game the moment you log back in.Lil_Rimmy said:Yeah, I was about to say that. Can't you literally just turn the online component off? And then you can't get raided?Bindal said:Well, the free version would be to just not go online at all. Bam. Done.
I mean, why should I pay for playing offline when I can just... go offline straight up?
Even if your disconnect and not playing online you can get raided by other players. Plus by not using the FOB it makes it significantly harder to impossible to develop the best weapons and items in the game.martyrdrebel27 said:you can disconnect from the servers in the pause menu, and don't have to do any multiplayer stuff.Colt47 said:So basically, they decided to include a "feature" that allows multiplayer antics to effect single player and didn't think about the fact some people would prefer just to play the single player mode without outside interference?
This is why I don't reserve games. Fuckin' KNEW Konami would pull some shit like this. Sucks too, as MGS5 was easily my most anticipated game this year... until I read this. MGS4 was one of my favorite games, period, so... yeah... this bums me out. Whatever--I'll grab it for $7 on Steam a year down the road.Scrythe said:For everyone who says "Just stick to single player then", you have to understand that they specifically designed the game to be incredibly obtuse and grind-y to purposely test your patience and make you more susceptible to forking over "just a few dollars" to make the game less aggravating. This is the same thing free-to-play mobile games have been doing for years.
While I've managed to complete games like CSR Racing without paying a single cent, not everyone has that level of patience. Constructing FOB's exponentially increases resource gains in single playr, but you absolutely have to buy MB Coins on order to build more than one. They also allow you to send more combat units out on missions. Again, in single player.
Even if one were to ignore the online component completely, it doesn't change the fact that they fundamentally changed some aspect of the single player experience to accommodate their nickel-and-dime scheme. Otherwise, you can just replay Mission 8 and Mission 9 for hours until you hit the resource cap, and then have to do it all over again when after upgrading.
Hell, they even made the maximum amount of GMP low enough to make you have to grind more for really expensive stuff. Without the cap, you could just farm GMP for a single day and be set for the rest of completion, but when you're capped at $5 million, you have to go back to farming often.
But going back to FOB's for a second: even if you're not playing, any FOB's you construct are still "online" to their servers, so anyone can attack them at any time even when you're not playing. So if you want to build your one free FOB, you still have to connect to their servers to collect the rewards/losses. You can't just build one and let it farm resources for you.
This was an absolutely absurd addition to an otherwise excellent game, and it's a real shame Konami is going so far to screw over their customers this way, and this is on top of cutting the ending out of the game, and their upcoming cosmetic DLC (The Tuxedo, goddamn Horse Armor, EVA outfit for Quiet, and probably more to come). I'm genuinely surprised they haven't tried putting the bandanna and stealth camo behind a paywall.
So what you are saying is that I turn my internet off BEFORE starting the game, then I would be UNSTOPPABLE?!RJ 17 said:CaptainMarvelous said:Yeah, but in both cases you can just play offline... I mean... that's what I've been doing.
Seems cheaper than insuring my digital shit.Bindal said:Well, the free version would be to just not go online at all. Bam. Done.
I mean, why should I pay for playing offline when I can just... go offline straight up?martyrdrebel27 said:you can disconnect from the servers in the pause menu, and don't have to do any multiplayer stuff.Colt47 said:So basically, they decided to include a "feature" that allows multiplayer antics to effect single player and didn't think about the fact some people would prefer just to play the single player mode without outside interference?To all of the above: no, there's no way to dodge being raided. Even when you're offline, your FOBs can and will still be raided, and whatever you lost will be subtracted from your game the moment you log back in.Lil_Rimmy said:Yeah, I was about to say that. Can't you literally just turn the online component off? And then you can't get raided?Bindal said:Well, the free version would be to just not go online at all. Bam. Done.
I mean, why should I pay for playing offline when I can just... go offline straight up?
The catch is that while you most certainly can turn the online mode off in the pause menu, the very first thing you do when you turn on the game is log into the servers. As such, the moment you turn the game on your status is updated and you lose everything that's been stolen.